This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Evaluating a Vehicle Climate Control System with a Passive Sensor Manikin coupled with a Thermal Comfort Model
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 03, 2018 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
In a previous study, a passive sensor (HVAC) manikin coupled with a human thermal model was used to predict the thermal comfort of human test participants. The manikin was positioned among the test participants while they were collectively exposed to a mild transient heat up within a thermally asymmetric chamber. Ambient conditions were measured using the HVAC manikin’s distributed sensor system, which measures air velocity, air temperature, radiant heat flux, and relative humidity. These measurements were supplied as input to a human thermal model to predict thermophysiological response and subsequently thermal sensation and comfort. The model predictions were shown to accurately reproduce the group trends and the “time to comfort” at which a transition occurred from a state of thermal discomfort to comfort.
In the current study, the effectiveness of using a coupled HVAC manikin-model system to evaluate a vehicle climate control system was investigated. The test protocol prescribed a transient heat up after a cold soak of a vehicle that had been placed in a - 10 °C climate chamber. Multiple repetitions of the same scenario were run with different human subjects to reduce the influence of individual bias on the overall results and to assess the variability of test responses. The thermal sensation and comfort of the human subjects were compiled and reported in terms of average and standard deviation, which were compared to the predictions of the manikin-model system. The agreement between the manikin-model system and the human subject test results was assessed quantitatively by calculating the RMSD (root-mean-square deviation) and bias (the average error) between the predictions and the measurements.
CitationHepokoski, M., Curran, A., Viola, T., Lindedal, N. et al., "Evaluating a Vehicle Climate Control System with a Passive Sensor Manikin coupled with a Thermal Comfort Model," SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0065, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0065.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
- Schweiker, M., Fuchs, X., Becker, S., Shukuya, M. et al., “Challenging the Assumptions for Thermal Sensation Scales,” Building Research & Information 45(5):572-589, 2017, doi:10.1080/09613218.2016.1183185.
- Hepokoski, M., Curran, A., Burke, R., Rugh, J. et al., “Simulating Physiological Response with a Passive Sensor Manikin and an Adaptive Thermal Manikin to Predict Thermal Sensation and Comfort,” SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-0329, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-0329.
- Hepokoski, M., Curran, A., Gullman, S., and Jacobsson, D., “Coupling a Passive Sensor Manikin with a Human Thermal Comfort Model to Predict Human Perception in Transient and Asymmetric Environments,” SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 10(1):135-140, 2017, doi:10.4271/2017-01-0178.
- Automotive HVAC Manikin System, 2016, http://thermetrics.com/products/automotive-hvac-manikin-system, retrieved October 12, 2016.
- TAITherm Human Thermal Model, 2016, http://www.thermoanalytics.com/pdf/human-thermal-flyer, retrieved October 12, 2016.
- Hepokoski, M., Gibbs, S., and Curran, A., “A New Anatomical and Thermophysiological Description of a 50th Percentile Adult Western Male,” Digital Human Modeling (DHM2016) Symposium, Montreal, 2016.
- ISO 14505-2:2006(E), Ergonomics of the Thermal Environment-Evaluation of Thermal Environments in Vehicles - Part 2: Determination of Equivalent Temperature, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2006.
- Zhang, H., Arens, E., Huizenga, C., and Han, T., “Thermal Sensation and Comfort Models for Non-uniform and Transient Environments: Part I: Local Sensation of Individual Body Parts,” Building and Environment, 2009, doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.06.018.
- Zhang, H., Arens, E., Huizenga, C., and Han, T., “Thermal Sensation and Comfort Models for Non-uniform and Transient Environments: Part II: Local Comfort of Individual Body Parts,” Building and Environment, 2009, doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.06.015.
- Zhang, H., Arens, E., Huizenga, C., and Han, T., “Thermal Sensation and Comfort Models for Non-uniform and Transient Environments: Part III: Whole-Body Sensation and Comfort,” Building and Environment, 2009, doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.06.020.
- Fiala, D., Lomas, K.J., and Stohrer, M., “First Principles Modeling of Thermal Sensation Responses in Steady-State and Transient Conditions,” ASHRAE Transactions 109(Part 1), 2003.
- Hepokoski, M., Curran, A., Burke, R., Rugh, J., Chaney, L., and Maranville, C., “Use of a Passive Sensor Manikin Coupled with a Thermoregulation Model to Predict Human Thermal Response to Environmental Conditions,” Proceedings of the 10th International Meeting for Manikins and Modeling, Tampere, Finland, 2014.
- ASHRAE, “Fundamentals Handbook,” (Atlanta, American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning Engineers, 2005), 8.1-8.29.
- ASTM International Standard F1291-05, “Standard Test Method for Measuring the Thermal Insulation of Clothing Using a Heated Manikin.”
- ASTM International Standard F2370-05, “Standard Test Method for Measuring the Evaporative Resistance of Clothing using a Sweating Manikin.”
- Newton Thermal Manikin, 2016, http://thermetrics.com/products/full-body-manikins/newton, retrieved October 12, 2016.
- McCullough, E.A., Jones, B.W., and Huck, J., “A Comprehensive Data Base for Estimating Clothing Insulation,” ASHRAE Transactions 91(Part 2), 1985.
- Nelson, D.A., Curlee, J.S., and Curran, A.R., “Determining Localized Garment Insulation Values from Manikin Studies: Computational Methods and Results,” European Journal of Applied Physiology 95(5-6):464-473, 2004 (2005).
- Psikuta, A., Fiala, D., Laschewski, G., Jendritzky, G. et al., “Validation of the Fiala Multi-Node Thermophysiological Model for UTCI Application,” Int J Biometeorol. 56(3):443-460, 2012, doi:10.1007/s00484-011-0450-5.