This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Assessment of Port Water Injection Strategies to Control Knock in a GDI Engine through Multi-Cycle CFD Simulations
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published September 04, 2017 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Water injection in highly boosted gasoline direct injection (GDI) engines has become an attractive area over the last few years as a way of increasing efficiency, enhancing performance and reducing emissions. The technology and its effects are not new, but current gasoline engine trends for passenger vehicles have several motivations for adopting this technology today. Water injection enables higher compression ratios, optimal spark timing and elimination of fuel enrichment at high load, and possibly replacement of EGR. Physically, water reduces charge temperature by evaporation, dilutes combustion, and varies the specific heat ratio of the working fluid, with complex effects.
Several of these mutually intertwined aspects are investigated in this paper through computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, focusing on a turbo-charged GDI engine with port water injection (PWI). Different strategies for water injection timing, pressure and spray targeting are investigated. Two combustion modeling approaches are used and compared, the perfectly stirred reactor model with reduced chemical kinetics for a TPRF surrogate, and the G-equation turbulent combustion model. Combustion rate results are validated against available experimental engine data, in regular and knocking conditions. Multi-cycle simulations are required because of the wall film dynamics, and therefore have been performed to assess the effect of water injection strategies. The results of the study are an assessment of the optimal injection parameters, in terms of injector location, injection timing and primary atomization quality, for achieving the maximum effectiveness of water injection. Knock occurrences are in very good agreement with the experimental data and its suppression is demonstrated through the injection of water at a ratio of 30% to the fuel mass.
CitationBattistoni, M., Grimaldi, C., Cruccolini, V., Discepoli, G. et al., "Assessment of Port Water Injection Strategies to Control Knock in a GDI Engine through Multi-Cycle CFD Simulations," SAE Technical Paper 2017-24-0034, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-24-0034.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
- Hoppe F., Thewes M., Baumgarten H., Dohmen J., "Water injection for gasoline engines: Potentials, challenges, and solutions." International Journal of Engine Research 17, no. 1 (2016): 86-96. doi:10.1177/1468087415599867.
- Thewes. M., Baumgarten H., Scharf J., Birmes G., Balazs A., Lehrheuer B., Hoppe F., “Water Injection - High Power and High Efficiency Combined”, 25th Aachen Colloquium Automobile and Engine Technology 2016, At Aachen.
- Pauer T., Frohnmaier M., Walther J., Schenk P., Hettinger A., Kampmann S., "Optimization of Gasoline Engines by Water Injection", 37th International Vienna Motor Symposium, 2016, Vienna.
- Bozza F., De Bellis V., Teodosio L., "Potentials of cooled EGR and water injection for knock resistance and fuel consumption improvements of gasoline engines." Applied Energy 169 (2016): 112-25. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.129.
- Berni, F., Breda, S., D'Adamo, A., Fontanesi, S. et al., "Numerical Investigation on the Effects of Water/Methanol Injection as Knock Suppressor to Increase the Fuel Efficiency of a Highly Downsized GDI Engine," SAE Technical Paper 2015-24-2499, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-24-2499.
- Berni, F., Breda S., Lugli M., and Cantore G.. "A Numerical Investigation on the Potentials of Water Injection to Increase Knock Resistance and Reduce Fuel Consumption in Highly Downsized G132DI Engines." Energy Procedia 81 (2015): 826-35. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2015.12.091.
- Tauzia, X., Maiboom A., and Shah S.R.. "Experimental study of inlet manifold water injection on combustion and emissions of an automotive direct injection Diesel engine." Energy 35, no. 9 (2010): 3628-639. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2010.05.007.
- Mubarak Ali, M., Hernandez Perez, F., Vedharaj, S., Vallinayagam, R. et al., "Effect of Timing and Location of Hotspot on Super Knock during Pre-ignition," SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-0686, 2017, doi:10.4271/2017-01-0686.
- Robert, A., Richard S., Colin O., and Poinsot T.. "LES study of deflagration to detonation mechanisms in a downsized spark ignition engine." Combustion and Flame 162, no. 7 (2015): 2788-807. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.04.010.
- Christensen, M. and Johansson, B., "Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition with Water Injection," SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-0182, 1999, doi:10.4271/1999-01-0182.
- Lanzafame, R., "Water Injection Effects In A Single-Cylinder CFR Engine," SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-0568, 1999, doi:10.4271/1999-01-0568.
- Mingrui, W., Sa N.T., Turkson R.F., Jinping L., and Guanlun G.. "Water injection for higher engine performance and lower emissions." Journal of the Energy Institute 90, no. 2 (2017): 285-99. doi:10.1016/j.joei.2015.12.003.
- Şahin Z., Tuti M., Durgun O.. "Experimental investigation of the effects of water adding to the intake air on the engine performance and exhaust emissions in a DI automotive diesel engine." Fuel 115 (2014): 884-95. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2012.10.080.
- Kim, J., Park H., Bae C., Choi M., and Kwak Y.. "Effects of water direct injection on the torque enhancement and fuel consumption reduction of a gasoline engine under high-load conditions." International Journal of Engine Research 17, no. 7 (2015): 795-808. doi:10.1177/1468087415613221.
- Corti, E. and Forte, C., "Combination of In-Cylinder Pressure Signal Analysis and CFD Simulation for Knock Detection Purposes," SAE Int. J. Engines 2(2):268-380, 2010, doi:10.4271/2009-24-0019.
- D'adamo, A., Breda S., Fontanesi S., Irimescu A., Merola S.S., Tornatore C., "A RANS knock model to predict the statistical occurrence of engine knock." Applied Energy 191 (2017): 251-63. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.01.101.
- D'Adamo, A., Breda, S., Iaccarino, S., Berni, F. et al., "Development of a RANS-Based Knock Model to Infer the Knock Probability in a Research Spark-Ignition Engine," SAE Int. J. Engines 10(3):2017, doi:10.4271/2017-01-0551.
- Linse, D., Kleemann A., and Hasse C.. "Probability density function approach coupled with detailed chemical kinetics for the prediction of knock in turbocharged direct injection spark ignition engines." Combustion and Flame 161, no. 4 (2014): 997-1014. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.10.025.
- Chevillard, S., Colin, O., Bohbot, J., Wang, M. et al., "Advanced Methodology to Investigate Knock for Downsized Gasoline Direct Injection Engine Using 3D RANS Simulations," SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-0579, 2017, doi:10.4271/2017-01-0579.
- Peters N., “Turbulent combustion”, Cambridge University Press, 2000.
- Corti, E. and Forte, C., "Statistical Analysis of Indicating Parameters for Knock Detection Purposes," SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-0237, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-0237.
- Senecal, P., Richards, K., Pomraning, E., Yang, T. et al., "A New Parallel Cut-Cell Cartesian CFD Code for Rapid Grid Generation Applied to In-Cylinder Diesel Engine Simulations," SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0159, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-0159.
- Richards, K. J., Senecal, P. K., and Pomraning, E. CONVERGE v.2.3 Documentation. Convergent Sciences Inc, (2016).
- Issa, R.I. “Solution of the implicitly discretised fluid flow equations by operator-splitting”, J. Comput. Phys. 62, 40-65 (1986).
- Pomraning, E., Richards, K., and Senecal, P., "Modeling Turbulent Combustion Using a RANS Model, Detailed Chemistry, and Adaptive Mesh Refinement," SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-1116, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-1116.
- Battistoni, M., Mariani F., Risi F., and Poggiani C.. "Combustion CFD Modeling of a Spark Ignited Optical Access Engine Fueled with Gasoline and Ethanol." Energy Procedia 82 (2015): 424-31. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.829.
- Scarcelli, R., Richards, K., Pomraning, E., Senecal, P. et al., "Cycle-to-Cycle Variations in Multi-Cycle Engine RANS Simulations," SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-0593, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-0593.
- Andrae, J.C.G., Brinck T., and Kalghatgi G.T.. "HCCI experiments with toluene reference fuels modeled by a semidetailed chemical kinetic model." Combustion and Flame 155, no. 4 (2008): 696-712. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2008.05.010.
- Morgan, Neal, Andrew Smallbone, Amit Bhave, Markus Kraft, Roger Cracknell, and Gautam Kalghatgi. "Mapping surrogate gasoline compositions into RON/MON space." Combustion and Flame 157, no. 6 (2010): 1122-131. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.02.003.
- Kalghatgi, G., Algunaibet, I., and Morganti, K., "On Knock Intensity and Superknock in SI Engines," SAE Int. J. Engines 10(3):2017, doi:10.4271/2017-01-0689.
- Babajimopoulos, A., Assanis D. N., Flowers D. L., Aceves S. M., and Hessel R. P.. "A fully coupled computational fluid dynamics and multi-zone model with detailed chemical kinetics for the simulation of premixed charge compression ignition engines." International Journal of Engine Research 6, no. 5 (2005): 497-512. doi:10.1243/146808705x30503.
- Scarcelli R, Sevik J, Wallner T, Richards K, Pomraning E, Senecal PK., “Capturing Cyclic Variability in Exhaust Gas Recirculation Dilute Spark-Ignition Combustion Using Multicycle RANS”. ASME. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;138(11):112803-112803-8. doi:10.1115/1.4033184.
- Richards K, Probst D, Pomraning E, Senecal PK, Scarcelli R., “The Observation of Cyclic Variation in Engine Simulations When Using RANS Turbulence Modeling”. ASME. Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Technical Conference, 2014, doi:10.1115/ICEF2014-5605.
- Heywood, J. B., “Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals.” New York: McGraw-Hill, 1988.
- Kistler, KiBox To Go instruction manual. Winterthur: Kistler Group, 2009.