This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Validation Studies for an Advanced Aerodynamic Development Process of Cab-Over Type Heavy Trucks
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published October 25, 2017 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
The implementation of an advanced process for the aerodynamic development of cab-over type heavy trucks at China FAW Group Corporation (FAW) requires a rigorous validation of the tools employed in this process. The final objective of the aerodynamic optimization of a heavy truck is the reduction of the fuel consumption. The aerodynamic drag of a heavy truck contributes up to 50% of the overall resistance and thus fuel consumption. An accurate prediction of the aerodynamic drag under real world driving conditions is therefore very important.
Tools used for the aerodynamic development of heavy trucks include Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), wind tunnels and track and road testing methods. CFD and wind tunnels are of particular importance in the early phase development. While wind tunnels provide a physical test environment with repeatable conditions their availability is very limited and they also have several other limitations which make it difficult to predict on road performance of the truck. Such limitations are blockage and pressure gradient effects, lack of road simulation and Reynolds number effects. While on the other hand CFD does not have such limitations the accuracy of CFD is often questioned and needs to be proven. In this study an extensive test program for a FAW heavy truck has been carried out in the wind tunnel of the National Research Council Canada (NRC). For a direct comparison of forces and pressures between wind tunnel and CFD, a model of the wind tunnel is included in the CFD simulations and a blockage correction method consistent with the NRC wind tunnel correction is applied to the CFD results. CFD is also used to predict the drag under open road driving conditions and results are compared to the blockage corrected data from wind tunnel test and simulation. For further correlation, measured and simulated results for wind averaged drag are then entered into a fuel consumption model to predict the fuel consumption for open road cruising at 90 km/h which is compared to respective test track measurements.
CitationLiao, G., Sun, S., Lu, K., Fu, Q. et al., "Validation Studies for an Advanced Aerodynamic Development Process of Cab-Over Type Heavy Trucks," SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-7009, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-7009.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
- DieselNet, Engine & Emission Technology Online, https://www.dieselnet.com/standards/cn/hd.php, accessed July 2017.
- Limits and measurement methods for exhaust pollutants from compression ignition and gas fueled positive ignition engines of vehicles (III, IV, V), GB 17691-2005 2007-01-01实施, Nationwide Emission Standard for Heavy-Duty Diesel and Gasoline Vehicles in China.
- 21st Century Truck Partnership Roadmap and Technical White Papers, December 2006. U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Program. 21CTP-003. p. 36.
- Clarke, Robert M., “Truck Manufacturers Program to Reduce Aerodynamic Drag”, Truck Manufacturers Association, DOE Heavy Vehicle Systems Optimization Merit Review, April 2006, included in https://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/03/f8/21ctp_roadmap_appendix_2007.pdf, accessed Sep. 2017.
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and National Highway Traffic Safety Adminstration (NHTSA), Final Rule for Phase 1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles, https://www.epa.gov/regulations-emissions-vehicles-and-engines/final-rule-phase-1-greenhouse-gas-emissions-standards-and#rule-summary, Final Rule and Regulatory Impact Analysis documents, accessed July 2017.
- U.S. EPA/NHTSA, Final Rule for Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles - Phase 2, https://www.epa.gov/regulations-emissions-vehicles-and-engines/final-rule-greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-fuel-efficiency, Final Rule and Regulatory Impact Analysis documents, accessed July 2017.
- Mihelic, R., "Fuel and Freight Efficiency - Past, Present and Future Perspectives," SAE Int. J. Commer. Veh. 9(2):120-216, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-8020.
- Sun, S., Chang, Y., Wang, X., Fu, Q. et al., "Validation Study for the Introduction of an Aerodynamic Development Process of Heavy Trucks," SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-2444, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-2444.
- Heinecke, M., Beedy, J., Horrigan, K., and Sengupta, R., "Aerodynamic Study of a Production Tractor Trailer Combination using Simulation and Wind Tunnel Methods," SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-2040, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4271/2010-01-2040.
- Sengupta, R., Beedy, J., and Horrigan, K., "Combined Analysis of Cooling Airflow and Aerodynamic Drag for a Class 8 Tractor Trailer Combination," SAE Int. J. Commer. Veh. 4(1):263-274, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-2288.
- Schuetz, T., “Aerodynamics of Road Vehicles, Fifth Edition,” (Warrendale, SAE International, 2015), doi:10.4271/R-430.
- Larose, G., Tanguay, B., Van Every, D., Bender, T., "The New Boundary Layer Control System for NRC’s 9mx9m Wind Tunnel", AIAA Technical Paper, AIAA-2001-0455, 2001.
- SAE International Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice, "SAE Wind Tunnel Test Procedure for Trucks and Buses," SAE Standard J1252, Rev. July 2012.
- Exa Corporation, http://exa.com/en/product/simulation-tools/powerflow-cfd-simulation, accessed July 2017.
- Chen, H., et al., “Extended Boltzmann Kinetic Equation for Turbulent Flows,” Science, Vol. 301, 2003, pp. 633-636.
- Kotapati, R., Keating, A., Kandasamy, S., Duncan, B. et al., "The Lattice-Boltzmann-VLES Method for Automotive Fluid Dynamics Simulation, a Review," SAE Technical Paper 2009-26-0057, 2009, https://doi.org/10.4271/2009-26-0057.
- Yakhot, V and Orszag, S. A., “Renormalization Group Analysis of Turbulence, I. Basic Theory,” J. of Scientific Computing, vol 1, pp1-51, 1986.
- Chen, H., Orszag, S., Staroselsky, I and Succi, S., “Expanded Analogy between Boltzmann Kinetic Theory of Fluid and Turbulence”, J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 519, 2004, pp. 307-314.
- SAE International Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice, "Guidelines for Aerodynamic Assessment of Medium and Heavy Commercial Ground Vehicles Using Computational Fluid Dynamics,” SAE Standard J2966, Iss. Sept. 2013.
- Website of CATARC Yancheng Automotive Proving Ground Co., Ltd., http://www.capg.com.cn/cdcz_en/encdcz.aspx, accessed July 2017.
- Leuschen, J. and Mébarki, Y., "Examination of the Maskell III Blockage Correction Technique for Full Scale Testing in the NRC 9-Meter Wind Tunnel," SAE Int. J. Commer. Veh. 5(2):640-649, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-2047.
- Hyvärinen, A., “Investigation of blockage correction methods for full-scale wind tunnel testing of trucks”, Master Thesis, KTH, Royal Institute of Technology.
- Golsch, K., Duncan, B., and Kandasamy, S., "Improved CFD Methodology for Class 8 Tractor-Trailer Coastdown Correlation," SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-2412, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4271/2013-01-2412.