This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Adaptive Base-Flaps Under Variable Cross-Wind
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published August 25, 2017 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Road vehicles usually operate within windy environments. The combination of typical wind distributions and vehicle speeds, imposes on such vehicles aerodynamic yaw angles, β, which are often almost uniform up to 6° and relevant up to 14°. Drag saving devices are often optimized for zero cross-wind scenarios, minimizing drag only around these design conditions. This work presents the drag saving increase that an adaptive system can provide over a classic boat-tail.
In the experimental set up employed, two flaps are located at the rear lateral edges of an Ahmed body and respectively set at angles θ1 and θ2 with respect to the model. To evaluate the efficacy of different flap positioning strategies under cross-wind, the model was tested in a wind tunnel, , with and without flaps at yaw angles β = 0°, 3°, 6° or 9°. The flap sizes tested, δ, were 9% or 13% of the body width. For each β and δ, the maps of drag against the two flap angles were obtained.
The minimum drag is generally not located at the symmetric flap deflection, defined by θ1 = θ2. Such a condition is characteristic of static positioning and is equally effective for positive and negative β. The flap positioning strategies considered for comparison are the static symmetric configurations minimizing drag at each β and the adaptive configuration providing the minimum drag at every β. Except for β = 0°, the adaptive strategy consistently provides less drag than each optimal symmetric flap deflection.
Also, a static strategy cannot optimize the symmetric flap deflection at each β. When the average of each configuration drag, weighted with a realistic β distribution, is employed, the adaptive solution provides a drag reduction 40% to 70% higher than the best static positioning, depending on the flap length and exact yaw distribution.
CitationGarcia de la Cruz, J., Brackston, R., and Morrison, J., "Adaptive Base-Flaps Under Variable Cross-Wind," SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-7000, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-7000.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
- Marks C.H., Buckley F.T., and Walston W.H.. A study of the base drag of tractor-trailer trucks. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 100:443-448, 4 1978. DOI: 10.1115/1.3448705
- Hucho, W.-H., editor, "Aerodynamics of Road Vehicles-Fourth Edition, (Warrendale, Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., 1998), Goth H. and Mayr G., Commercial Vehicles, Chapter 9, pages 415-488, ISBN 978-0-7680-0029-0.
- McCallen R., Salari K., Ortega J., Castellucci P., et al. Doe’s effort to reduce truck aerodynamic drag-joint experiments and computations lead to smart design. In 34th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, page 2249, 2004. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2004-2249
- Cooper, K., "Truck Aerodynamics Reborn - Lessons from the Past," SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-3376, 2003, https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-3376.
- Cooper K.R.. Bluff-body aerodynamics as applied to vehicles. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 49(1):1-21, 1993. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(93)90003-7.
- RenSMART - The Renewable Energy Information Source, http://www.rensmart.com/Weather/, accessed July 2017.
- Troen I., and Petersen E. Lundtang. European Wind Atlas. Roskilde: Risø National Laboratory, 1989. 656 p. ISBN: 87-550-1482-8
- National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), Wind Speed Data, ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/noaa/, accessed July 2017.
- Grandemange M., Cadot O., Courbois A., Herbert V., et al. A study of wake effects on the drag of Ahmed’s squareback model at the industrial scale. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 145:282-291, 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.03.004
- Grandemange M., Mary A., Gohlke M., and Cadot O.. Effect on drag of the flow orientation at the base separation of a simplified blunt road vehicle. Experiments in Fluids, 54(1529), 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s00348-013-1529-z
- Brackston R.D., de la Cruz J.M. García, Wynn A., Rigas G., and Morrison J.F.. Stochastic modelling and feedback control of bistability in a turbulent bluff body wake. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 802:726-749, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2016.495.
- Ahmed, S., Ramm, G., and Faltin, G., "Some Salient Features Of The Time-Averaged Ground Vehicle Wake," SAE Technical Paper 840300, 1984, https://doi.org/10.4271/840300.
- Grandemange M., Gohlke M., and Cadot O.. Turbulent wake past a three-dimensional blunt body. Part 1. Global modes and bistability. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 722:51-84, 5 2013. DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2013.83
- Volpe R., Devinant P., and Kourta A.. Experimental characterization of the unsteady natural wake of the full-scale square back ahmed body: flow bistability and spectral analysis. Experiments in Fluids, 56(99), 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s00348-015-1972-0
- Cadot O., Evrard A., and Pastur L.. Imperfect supercritical bifurcation in a three-dimensional turbulent wake. Phys. Rev. E, 91:063005, 2015. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevE.91.063005.