This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
The Effect of Swirl on the Flow Uniformity in Automotive Exhaust Catalysts
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published October 08, 2017 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
In aftertreatment system design, flow uniformity is of paramount importance as it affects aftertreatment device conversion efficiency and durability. The major trend of downsizing engines using turbochargers means the effect of the turbine residual swirl on the flow needs to be considered. In this paper, this effect has been investigated experimentally and numerically. A swirling flow rig with a moving-block swirl generator was used to generate swirling flow in a sudden expansion diffuser with a wash-coated diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC) downstream. Hot-wire anemometry (HWA) was used to measure the axial and tangential velocities of the swirling flow upstream of the diffuser expansion and the axial velocity downstream the monolith. With no swirl, the flow in the catalyst monolith is highly non-uniform with maximum velocities near the diffuser axis. At high swirl levels, the flow is also highly nonuniform with the highest velocities near the diffuser wall. An intermediate swirl level exists where the flow is most uniform. To gain further insight into the mechanisms controlling flow redistribution, numerical simulations have been performed using the commercial CFD code STARCCM+. With no swirl, the central jet transverses the diffuser, and a drastic flow redistribution takes place near the monolith face due to its high resistance. Immediately downstream of the sudden expansion, the flow separates from the diffuser wall forming a separation zone around the central jet. Increasing swirl reduces the size of this separation zone, and eventually leads to the formation of the central recirculation zone characteristic of high swirl flows. At intermediate swirl levels, the size of the wall separation zone is reduced considerably, while the axial adverse pressure gradient is insufficient to cause a central recirculation. Such a flow regime occurs at relatively low swirl levels (S ~ 0.23). This may have positive implications for aftertreatment system design with low residual swirl levels from the turbine, which might be tuned by adjusting the distance between the turbine and the catalyst or employing guide vanes. The findings can be directly transferred to other aftertreatment systems with a catalyst or particulate filter. Moreover, swirling flows with an obstruction or a high resistance device downstream (e.g. a heat exchanger or filter) are present in many other applications such as cooling flows, combustion and turbomachinery. Therefore the results are relevant to a much wider research and industrial community.
CitationRusli, I., Aleksandrova, S., Medina, H., and Benjamin, S., "The Effect of Swirl on the Flow Uniformity in Automotive Exhaust Catalysts," SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-2384, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-2384.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
- Martin, A., Will, N., Bordet, A., Cornet, P. et al., "Effect of Flow Distribution on Emissions Performance of Catalytic Converters," SAE Technical Paper 980936, 1998, doi:10.4271/980936.
- Wendland, D., Sorrell, P., and Kreucher, J., "Sources of Monolith Catalytic Converter Pressure Loss," SAE Technical Paper 912372, 1991, doi:10.4271/912372.
- So, K. L., "Vortex Phenomena in a Conical Diffuser," AIAA J. 5(6):1062-1078, 1967, doi: 10.2514/3.4139.
- Clausen, P. D., Koh, S. G. and Wood, D. H., "Measurements of a Swirling Turbulent Boundary Layer Developing in a Conical Diffuser," Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 6(1):39-48, 1993, doi:10.1016/0894-1777(93)90039-L.
- Okhio, C. B., Horton, H. P. and Langer, G., "Effects of Swirl on Flow Separation and Performance of Wide Angle Diffusers," Int J Heat Fluid Fl. 4(4):199-206, 1983, doi: 10.1016/0142-727X(83)90039-5.
- McDonald, A. T., Fox, R. W. and Van Dewoestine, R. V., "Effects of Swirling Inlet Flow on Pressure Recovery in Conical Diffusers," AIAA J. 9(10):2014-2018, 1971, doi: 10.2514/3.6456.
- Senoo, Y., Kawaguchi, N. and Nagata, T., "Swirl Flow in Conical Diffusers," B JSME. 21(151):112-119, 1978, doi: 10.1299/jsme1958.21.112.
- Ramji, S.A., Tarun, M., Bharath, R., Arumugam, A. S., et al., "A Parametric Study on the Improvement of Pressure Recovery Coefficient of a Conical Diffuser using Computation Fluid Dynamics," in 2013 International Conference on Energy Efficient Technologies for Sustainability (ICEETS), Nagercoil, 2013, doi: 10.1109/ICEETS.2013.6533388.
- Escudier, M. P. and Keller, J. J., "Recirculation in Swirling Flow: A Manifestation of Vortex Breakdown," AIAA J. 23(1):111-116, 1985, doi: 10.2514/3.8878.
- Dellenback, P. A., Metzger, D. E. and Neitzel, G. P., "Measurements in Turbulent Swirling Flow through an Abrupt Axisymmetric Expansion," AIAA J. 26(6):669-681, 1988, doi: 10.2514/3.9952.
- Escudier, M. P., Bornstein, J. and Zehnder, N., "Observations and LDA Measurements of Confined Turbulent Vortex Flow," J Fluid Mech. 98(1):49-63, 1980, doi: 10.1017/S0022112080000031.
- Leuckel, W., "Swirl Intensities, Swirl Types and Energy Losses of Different Swirl Generating Devices," IFRF Doc No. G02/a/16, 1967.
- Skusiewicz, P., "Effect of Swirl on the Flow Distribution across Automotive Emissions After-treatment Devices", M.Sc. thesis, Coventry University, 2012.
- Wendland, D. and Matthes, W., "Visualization of Automotive Catalytic Converter Internal Flows," SAE Technical Paper 861554, 1986, doi:10.4271/861554.
- Ramadan, B., Lundberg, P., and Richmond, R., "Characterization of a Catalytic Converter Internal Flow," SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-4024, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-4024.
- Munnannur, A., Cremeens, C., and Liu, Z., "Development of Flow Uniformity Indices for Performance Evaluation of Aftertreatment Systems," SAE Int. J. Engines 4(1):1545-1555, 2011, doi:10.4271/2011-01-1239.
- Wegner, B., Maltsev, A., Schneider, C., Sadiki, A., et al., "Assessment of Unsteady RANS in Predicting Swirl Flow Instability Based on LES and Experiments," Int. J. Heat Fluid Fl. 25(3):528-536, 2004, doi:. 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2004.02.019.
- Iaccarino, G., "Predictions of a Turbulent Separated Flow Using Commercial CFD Codes," J. Fluids Eng. 123(4):819-828, 2001, doi: 10.1115/1.1400749.
- Benjamin, S. F. and Roberts, C., "Three-dimensional Modelling of NOx and Particulate Traps using CFD: A Porous Medium Approach," Appl Math Model. 31(11):2446-2460, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2006.10.015.
- Quadri, S. S., Benjamin, S. F. and Roberts, C., "An Experimental Investigation of Oblique Entry Pressure Losses in Automotive Catalytic Converters," P I Mech Eng C-J Mec, 223(11): 2561-2569, 2009, doi: 10.1243/09544062JMES1565.