This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Complete Body Aerodynamic Study of three Vehicles
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 28, 2017 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Cooling drag, typically known as the difference in drag coefficient between open and closed cooling configurations, has traditionally proven to be a difficult flow phenomenon to predict using computational fluid dynamics. It was seen as an academic yardstick before the advent of grille shutter systems. However, their introduction has increased the need to accurately predict the drag of a vehicle in a variety of different cooling configurations during vehicle development. This currently represents one of the greatest predictive challenges to the automotive industry due to being the net effect of many flow field changes around the vehicle.
A comprehensive study is presented in the paper to discuss the notion of defining cooling drag as a number and to explore its effect on three automotive models with different cooling drag deltas using the commercial CFD solvers; STARCCM+ and Exa PowerFLOW. The notchback DrivAer model with under-hood cooling provides a popular academic benchmark alongside two fully-engineered production cars; a large saloon (Jaguar XJ) and an SUV (Land Rover Range Rover). Initially three levels of spatial discretization were used with three steady-state RANS solvers (k-ε realizable, k-ω SST and Spalart-Allmaras) to ascertain whether previous work using RANS on the large saloon studying cooling flows could be replicated on other vehicle shapes.
For both the full-production vehicles, all three turbulence models were capable of predicting the cooling drag delta within 5 counts (0.005 Cd). However, the DrivAer model was much more sensitive to both changes in turbulence models and mesh sizes. For the SA turbulence model only the drag coefficient was well predicted, for the other two RANS models no amount of grid refinement allowed the models to correctly predict the flow field. It was seen when comparing the k-ε realizable and SA turbulence models the difference in cooling drag was attributed to the rear of the vehicle. This highlighted that despite similar drag values from the cooling package, the cooling deltas were very different, suggesting that cooling drag cannot be thought of as open-closed drag with the addition of drag due to the cooling package.
Further work on the DrivAer model expanded on the RANS simulations utilizing the eddy-resolving methods, IDDES and LBM, as validation cases. Oscillations which were seen in the SA and k-ω SST RANS turbulence models were shown to be of similar levels to those in the transient methods indicating a pseudo-unsteadiness present in the steady-state solvers and the importance of resolving it. Drag and lift coefficient absolute values were compared showing that only the IDDES method with sliding wheels and LBM method could obtain physical results for the majority of the tested criteria.
CitationSimmonds, N., Pitman, J., Tsoutsanis, P., Jenkins, K. et al., "Complete Body Aerodynamic Study of three Vehicles," SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-1529, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-1529.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 5]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 6]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 7]|
- Barnard, R. Ledakis, N. Physical modeling and optimization of radiator cooling flow systems, in: Proc. 2nd MIRA Conference on Vehicle Aerodynamics, 1998.
- Barnard, R. H. Theoretical and experimental investigation of the aerodynamic drag due to automotive cooling systems, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering 214 (8) (2000) 919–927. doi:10.1177/095440700021400810. URL http://pid.sagepub.com/lookup/doi/10.1177/095440700021400810
- Alajbegovic, A., Xu, B., Konstantinov, A., Amodeo, J., "Simulation of Cooling Airflow under Different Driving Conditions," SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0766, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-0766.
- Jansen, W., Amodeo, J., Tate, E., and Yang, Z., "Drive Cycle Simulation of A Tiered Cooling Pack Using Non-Uniform Boundary Conditions," SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-0654, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-0654.
- Simmonds, N., Tsoutsanis, P., Drikakis, D., Gaylard, A., "Full Vehicle Aero-Thermal Cooling Drag Sensitivity Analysis for Various Radiator Pressure Drops," SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-1578, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-1578.
- Gaylard, A., "The Appropriate Use of CFD in the Automotive Design Process," SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-1162, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-1162.
- Alajbegovic, A., Sengupta, R., and Jansen, W., "Cooling Airflow Simulation for Passenger Cars using Detailed Underhood Geometry," SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-3478, 2006, doi:10.4271/2006-01-3478.
- Jansen, W., "Engine Air Intake Thermal Modelling in Full Vehicle Underhood Environment," SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-0861, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-0861.
- Zhang, C., Uddin, M., Song, X., Fu, C., "Simultaneous Improvement of Vehicle Under-Hood Airflow and Cooling Drag Using 3D CFD Simulation," SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-0200, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-0200.
- Soja, H. Wiedemann, J. The Interference between Exterior and Interior Flow on Road Vehicles, Ingenieures de l’Automobile 214 (1987) 101–105.
- Baeder, D. Indinger, T. Adams, N. A. Unterlechner, P. Wickern, G. Interference Effects of Cooling Air-Flows with External Aerodynamics, International Journal of Automotive Engineering (2011) 115–121.
- Wittmeier, F. and Kuthada, T., "Open Grille DrivAer Model -First Results," SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 8(1):252–260, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-1553.
- Kuthada, T., Wittmeier, F., Bock, B., Schoenleber, C. , "The Effects of Cooling Air on the Flow Field around a Vehicle," SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 9(2):723–732, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-1603.
- Kuthada, T. and Wiedemann, J., "Investigations in a Cooling Air Flow System under the Influence of Road Simulation," SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-0796, 2008, doi:10.4271/2008-01-0796.
- Collin, C., Mack, S., Indinger, T., and Mueller, J., "A Numerical and Experimental Evaluation of Open Jet Wind Tunnel Interferences using the DrivAer Reference Model," SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 9(2):657–679, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-1597.
- Guilmineau, E., "Numerical Simulations of Flow around a Realistic Generic Car Model," SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 7(2):646–653, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-0607.
- Ashton, N. and Revell, A., "Comparison of RANS and DES Methods for the DrivAer Automotive Body," SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1538, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-1538.
- Heft, A., Indinger, T., and Adams, N., "Introduction of a New Realistic Generic Car Model for Aerodynamic Investigations," SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-0168, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-0168.
- Spalart, P. R. Allmaras, S. R. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows, La Recherche Aerospatiale 1 (1) (1994) 5–21. doi:10.2514/6.1992-439.
- Shih, T. H. Liou, W. W. Shabbir, A. Yang, Z. Zhu, J., A New K-epsilon Eddy Viscosity Model for High Reynolds Number Turbulent Flows: Model Development and Validation, Computer & Fluids 24 (August) (1995) 227–238. doi:10.1016/0045-7930(94)00032-T.
- Menter F. R., Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications, AIAA Journal 32 (8) (1994) 1598–1605. doi:10.2514/3.12149. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/3.12149
- Forbes, D., Page, G., Passmore, M., and Gaylard, A., "A Fully Coupled, 6 Degree-of-Freedom, Aerodynamic and Vehicle Handling Crosswind Simulation using the DrivAer Model," SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 9(2):710–722, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-1601.
- Landström, C. Sebben, S. Löfdahl L., Effects of wheel orientation on predicted flow field and forces when modelling rotating wheels using CFD, in: 8th MIRA International Vehicle Aerodynamics Conference, 2010.
- Evas S.Lardeau S., Validation of a turbulence methodology using the SST k-ω model for adjoint calculation, 54th AIAA Aerospace Science Meeting, San Diego ,California, USA, 2016 doi:10.2514/6.2016-0585
- Strangfeld, C., Wieser, D., Schmidt, H., Woszidlo, R. , "Experimental Study of Baseline Flow Characteristics for the Realistic Car Model DrivAer," SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-1251, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-1251.