This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Metric To Quantify Attentional Workload In Dual Task Driving Conditions
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 28, 2017 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
A class of driver attentional workload metrics has been developed for possible application to the measuring and monitoring of attentional workload and level of distraction in actual driving, as well as in the evaluation and comparison of in-vehicle human machine interface (HMI or DVI) devices. The metrics include driver/vehicle response and performance measures, driver control activity, and driver control models and parameters. They are the result of a multidisciplinary, experimental and analytical effort, applying control theory, manual control, and human factors principles and practices. Driving simulator and over-the-road experiments were used to develop, confirm, and demonstrate the use of the metrics in distracted driving situations. The visual-manual secondary tasks used in the study included navigation destination entry, radio tuning, critical tracking task, and a generic touch screen entry task. Non-visual-manual secondary tasks included visual-voice navi, hands free cell phone, Sternberg surrogate task, and a conjunction search task. The metrics provide objective measures of the driver's attentional workload or level of distraction in a dual task situation. In addition to objective driver/vehicle performance measures, and unique to this study, driver describing function measures of driver gain and time delay were calculated on a continuous real time basis for steering control tasks. These describing function terms give a direct measure of the level of driver control activity and attention to the primary driving task. Novel methods were used to obtain the driver describing function measures continuously in real time in over-the-road conditions, using the basic response and performance measures already available in a typical vehicle. As objective metrics of distraction or attentional demand, the metrics can also be used to compare dual task workload against a baseline, or to compare two dual task situations and HMIs. The metrics are intended to quantify and monitor level of distraction in dual task conditions.
CitationWeir, D., Chao, K., and Van Auken, R., "A Metric To Quantify Attentional Workload In Dual Task Driving Conditions," SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-1376, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-1376.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 5]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 6]|
- Angell, L.S., Young, R.A., Hankey, J.M., and Dingus, T.A., An evaluation of alternative methods for assessing driver workload in the early development of in-vehicle information systems. SAE Government/Industry Meeting, Washington, D.C., 2002.
- Angell, L., Auflick, J., Austria, P., W, B., Diptiman, T., Hogsett, J., Kiger, S., Kochhar, D., and Tijerina, L., Driver Workload Metrics Project, Task 2 Final Report. NHTSA, DOT HS 810 635, 2006.
- Young, R.A., Seaman, S., and Hsieh, L., Measuring cognitive distraction on the road and in the lab with the Wayne State detection response task. TRB Panel 613, TRB, Washington, D.C, January 24, 2012.
- PROCEEDINGS of the 3rd International Conference on Driver Distraction and Inattention, September 4-6, 2013, Gothenburg, Sweden (No. 67-P).
- Queuing Network Modeling of Driver Lateral Control With or Without a Cognitive Distraction Task (Dec 2012), IEEE TRANS on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 13.4 Dec 2012.
- Simulator Study of Effects of Alternative Distraction Mitigation Strategies in Driver Workload Manager (2011) Transportation Research Record 2248.
- Sheridan, T.B. Driver Distraction From a Control Theory Perspective. Jour HFES, Vol. 40, No. 4, 2004.
- Strayer, D.L., and Fisher, D.L., SPIDER. A Framework for Understanding Driver Distraction, Jour HFES, Vol. 58, 2016.
- Jin, L., et al, Driver Cognitive Distraction Detection Using Driving Performance Measures, Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Vol. 2012.
- Rupp, G., Performance Metrics for Assessing Driver Distraction: The Quest for Improved Road Safety. SAE R-402, 2010.
- Young, K.L., Lee, J.D., and Regan, M.A., Driver Distraction: Theory, Effects, and Mitigation. CRC Press, 2009.
- Weir, D.H., and Chao, K.C., Development of Attentional Workload Metrics to Assess Driver Distraction, 2nd International Conference on Driver Distraction and Inattention, Gothenburg, Sweden, September 5-7, 2011.
- Draper, N.R., and Smith, H., Applied Regression Analysis, 2nd Ed., John Wiley and Sons, N.Y., 1981.
- McRuer, D.T., Allen R.W., Weir D.H., and Klein R.H., (1977). New Results in Driver Steering Control Models, Human Factors, Vol. 19, No. 4.
- Weir, D.H., and McRuer, D.T., (1968). A Theory for Driver Steering Control of Motor Vehicles, Highway Research Record, Vol. 247.
- Weir, D.H., and McRuer, D.T., (1973). Measurement and Interpretation of Driver/Vehicle System Dynamic Response, Human Factors, Vol. 15, No. 4.
- Weir, D.H., and Chao, K.C., Review of Control Theory Models for Directional and Speed Control, Proceedings of the International Workshop on Modelling Driver Behavior in Automotive Environments, Ispra, Italy, Office for Official Publication of the European Communities, 2005.
- Hoffman, E. R., (1975). Manual Control of Road Vehicles, Vehicle System Dynamics, Vol. 5, No. 1-2.
- Donges, E., (1978). A Two-level Model of Driver Steering Behavior, Human Factors, 20, pp. 691-707.
- Sheridan, T.B. and Ferrell, W.R., (1981). Man-Machine Systems, Information, Control, and Decision Models of Human Performance, Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press.
- Levison, W., and Cramer, N., (1995). Description of the Integrated Driver Model, Report FHWA-RD-94-092, FHWA, US DOT.
- MacAdam, C.C., (2003). Understanding and Modelling the Human Driver, Vehicle System Dynamics, 40, pp. 101-134.
- Brown, T L., Lee, J.D., and McGehee, D.V., (2001). Human Performance Models and Rear-end Collision Avoidance Algorithms, Human Factors, 43, pp. 462-482.
- McRuer, D.T. and Weir, D.H., (1969). Theory of Manual Vehicular Control, IEEE Trans., Vol. MMS-10, No. 4. (Also Ergonomics, Vol. 12, No. 5, 1969).
- McRuer, D.T., and Krendel, E.S., Mathematical Models of Human Pilot Behavior, AGARDograph No. 188, 1974.
- McRuer, D.T., Weir, D.H., Jex, H.R., Magdaleno, R.E., and Allen, R.W., (1975). Measurement of Driver/Vehicle Multiloop Response Properties with a Single Disturbance Input, IEEE Trans. Vol. SMC-5, No. 5.
- Weir, D.H., Application of a Driving Simulator to the Development of In- Vehicle Human-Machine-Interfaces, Journal of International Association of Traffic and Safety Sciences, Vol. 34, No. 1, 16-21, 2010.
- Weir, D., Chiang, D., and Brooks, A., "A Study of the Effect of Varying Visual Occlusion and Task Duration Conditions on Driver Behavior and Performance while Using a Secondary Task Human-Machine Interface," SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-0128, 2003, doi:10.4271/2003-01-0128.
- Calibration tasks for methods which assess driver demand due to the use of in-vehicle systems, ISO/TS 14198, 2012-11-15.
- Statement of Principles, Criteria and Verification Procedures on Driver Interaction with Advanced In-Vehicle Information and Communication System, Detroit, MI, Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, 2006.
- Visual-Manual NHTSA Driver Distraction Guidelines for In-Vehicle Electronic Devices, Federal Register 78:81, April 2013.
- SAE Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice, "Subjective Rating Scale for Vehicle Ride and Handling," SAE Standard J1441, Rev. March 2014.
- SAE Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice, "Ride Index Structure and Development Methodology," SAE Standard J2834, October 2013.
- Detection - Response Task for assessing attentional effects of cognitive load in driving, ISO/DS 17488, 2014-09-02.
- Wingrove, R.C., and Edwards, F.G., A Technique for Identifying Pilot Describing Functions from Routine Flight-Test Records, NASA Report No. NASA-TN-D-5127, May 1, 1969.