This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Modular Design and Methods to Optimize Seat Complete Assemblies
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 28, 2017 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Modularity in product architecture and its significance in product development have become an important product design topics in the last few decades. Several Product Modularity definitions and methodologies were developed by many researchers; however, most of the definitions and concepts have proliferated to the extent that it is difficult to apply one universal definition for modular product architecture and in product development.
Automotive seat modular strategy and key factors for consideration towards modular seat design and assemblies are the main focus of this work. The primary objectives are focused on the most “natural segmentation” of the seat elements (i.e., cushions, backs, trims, plastics, head restraints, etc.) to enable the greatest ease of final assembly and greatest flexibility for scalable feature offerings around common assembly “hard-points.” Additionally, modular design disciplines enable a “lean” strategic approach that standardizes assembly, parts, and Bill of Process for the greatest efficiencies. A comparison of integrated seat system design and assembly with modular strategy and assembly reveals that a carefully designed modular seat system is not only cost and time-effective, from an assembly and product development point of view but it also crucial for serviceability and early failure mode detection and avoidance. The Design Structure Matrix (DSM) methodology was used to represent the seat system parts and relations between them and identify its logical modules.
It is clear that modular seat system design is essential for managing variety. It improves engineering efficiency by balancing of functional/attributes requirements, product design, manufacturing, assembly, and supply-chain management.
|Technical Paper||Reliability and Robustness Mindset in Automotive Product Development for Global Markets|
|Technical Paper||Automotive Product Design and Development – The Current State and Looking into the Future|
|Aerospace Standard||Process Improvement Guidelines|
CitationBerry, S., ElMaraghy, H., Line, J., and Kondrad, M., "Modular Design and Methods to Optimize Seat Complete Assemblies," SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-1309, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-1309.
- ElMaraghy, H., Schuh, G., ElMaraghy, W., Piller, F., “Product Variety Management,” CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology 62 (2013) 629–652, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2013.05.007
- Baldwin, C. Y., Clark, K. B., “Managing in the age of modularity,” Harvard Bus. Rev., vol. 75, pp. 84–93, Sep.-Oct. 1997.
- Pahl, G., and Beitz, W., Engineering Design. London, U.K.: The Design Council, 1984.
- Shamsuzzoha, A., Helo, P.T., and Kekale, T., 2010, “Application of modularity in world automotive industries: a literature analysis,” International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 10/4: 361–377
- Gershenson, J. K., Parasad, G. J., and Zhang, Y., 2004, “Product modularity: measures and design methods,” Journal of Engineering Design 15/1: 33–51
- Ulrich, K., 1995, “The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm,” Research Policy, 24/3: 419–440
- ElMaraghy, H., AlGeddawy, T., 2015, “A Methodology for Modular and Changeable Design Architecture and Application in Automotive Framing Systems”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 137, Iss. 12, pp 121403 – 121413.
- Hirtz, J., Stone, R. B., and McAdams, D., 2002, “A Functional Basis for Engineering Design: Reconciling and Evolving Previous Efforts,” Research Engineering Design, 13(2), pp. 65–82