This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Performance of an Indirect Injected Engine Operated with ULSD#2 Blended with Fischer-Tropsch Synthetic Kerosene
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 28, 2017 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
This study investigates the use of a natural gas derived fuel, synthetic Fischer-Tropsch (F-T) paraffinic kerosene, in both it’s neat form and blended with ultra-low sulfur diesel (ULSD#2), in a naturally aspirated indirect injected engine. A blend of a mass ratio with 20% of the F-T fuel and 80% ULSD#2 was studied for its combustion characteristics, emissions, and efficiency compared to conventional ULSD#2 at a constant speed of 2400 RPM and operating at IMEP range from 4.5 to 6.5 bar. The F-T blend produced ignition delays 17% shorter than ULSD#2 resulting in slightly lower peak apparent heat release rates (AHRR) along with decreased peak combustion temperatures, by up to 50°C. Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) emissions of the F-T blend decreased by 4.0% at 4.5 bar IMEP and at negligible amounts at 6.5 bar IMEP. The F-T blend decreased soot significantly at 5.4 bar IMEP by 40%. Efficiencies of the F-T blend were similar to ULSD#2. Mechanical Efficiency increased with load from 45% to 64%, and thermal efficiency reached 42% for the blended fuel and 46% for ULSD at 4.5 IMEP. The results prove that the F-T fuel is a potential future alternative to ULSD#2.
- Valentin Soloiu - Georgia Southern University
- Remi Gaubert - Georgia Southern University
- Martin Muinos - Georgia Southern University
- Jose Moncada - Georgia Southern University
- Thomas Beyerl - Georgia Southern University
- Gustavo Molina - Georgia Southern University
- Johnnie Williams - Georgia Southern University
CitationSoloiu, V., Gaubert, R., Muinos, M., Moncada, J. et al., "Performance of an Indirect Injected Engine Operated with ULSD#2 Blended with Fischer-Tropsch Synthetic Kerosene," SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-1283, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-1283.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 5]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 6]|
- Alleman, T. and McCormick, R., "Fischer-Tropsch Diesel Fuels - Properties and Exhaust Emissions: A Literature Review," SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-0763, 2003, doi:10.4271/2003-01-0763.
- Lee, Jinwoo., and Bae, Choongsik., “Application of JP-8 in a Heavy Duty diesel Engine”. Fuel 90 (2011): 1762–70, accessed Septmember 26, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.01.032
- Wu, T., Huang, Z., Zhang, W., Fang, J., and Yin, Q., “Physical and chemical Properties of GTL-Diesel Fuel Blends and Their Effects on Performance and Emissions of Multicylinder DI Compression Ignition Engine”. Energy & Fuels 21 2007: 1908–14, accessed September 26, 2016. 10.1021/ef0606512.
- Schaberg, P., Myburgh, I., Botha, J., and Khalek, I., "Comparative Emissions Performance of Sasol Fischer-Tropsch Diesel Fuel in Current and Older Technology Heavy-Duty Engines," SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-1912, 2000, doi:10.4271/2000-01-1912.
- Atkinson, C., Thompson, G., Traver, M., and Clark, N., "In-Cylinder Combustion Pressure Characteristics of Fischer-Tropsch and Conventional Diesel Fuels in a Heavy Duty CI Engine," SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-1472, 1999, doi:10.4271/1999-01-1472.
- Soloiu, V., Ochieng, H., Weaver, J., Duggan, M. , "Combustion and Emissions Characteristics of JP-8 Blends and ULSD #2 with Similar CN in a Direct Injection Naturally Aspirated Compression Engine," SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-1682, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-1682.
- Soloiu, V., Muinos, M., Harp, S., Naes, T. , "Combustion and Emissions Characteristics of Dual Fuel Premixed Charge Compression Ignition with Direct Injection of Synthetic FT Kerosene Produced from Natural Gas and Port Fuel Injection of n-Butanol," SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-0787, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-0787.
- Abu-Jrai, A., Rodríguez-Fernández, J., Tsolakis, A., Megaritis, A., Theinnoi, K., Cracknell, R.F., and Clark, R.H., “Performance, Combustion and emissions of a Diesel Engine Operated with Reformed EGR. Comparison of diesel and GTL Fuelling”. Fuel 88 (2009): http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2008.12.001
- Abu-Jrai, A., Tsolakis, A., Theinnoi, K., Cracknell, R., Megaritis, A., Wyszynski, M.L., and Golunski, S.E., “Effect of Gas-to-Liquid diesel Fuels on Combustion Characteristics, Engine Emissions, and Exhaust Gas Fuel Reforming. Comparative Study”. Energy & Fuels 20 (2006): 2377–84 10.1021/ef060332a
- Piperel, A., Pidol, L., Noel, L., and Jeuland, N., "Influence of Fischer-Tropsch Incorporation on Engine Outputs and Performances of a Modern Diesel Engine with Standard and Optimized Settings," SAE Technical Paper 2011-24-0114, 2011, doi:10.4271/2011-24-0114.
- Papagiannakis, R., Kotsiopoulos, P., Hountalas, D., and Yfantis, E., "Single Fuel Research Program Comparative Results of the Use of JP-8 Aviation Fuel versus Diesel Fuel on a Direct Injection and Indirect Injection Diesel Engine," SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-1673, 2006, doi:10.4271/2006-01-1673.
- Schaberg, P., Botha, J., Schnell, M., Hermann, H. , "Emissions Performance of GTL Diesel Fuel and Blends with Optimized Engine Calibrations," SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-2187, 2005, doi:10.4271/2005-01-2187.
- Malvern Instruments Ltd., 'Spraytec User Manual,’ Malvern, Worcestershire: 69–420, 2006.
- Heywood, John B. Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals, New York: McGraw Hill, 1988.
- Borman, G., Nishiwaki, K., 1987, “Internal-Combustion Engine Heat Transfer”, Prog Energy Combust Sci, Vol. 13 1–46.
- Soloiu, V., Weaver, J., Ochieng, H., Duggan, M., , “Cotton Seed FAME Combustion and Emissions Research in a DI Diesel Engine” ASME ICEF 2013–19243, 2013, doi:10.1115/ICEF2013-19243.
- Schaberg, P. and Wattrus, M., "Comparative Emissions Performance of Blends of GTL Diesel and FAME," SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-2769, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-2769.