This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Particulate Emissions from a China V Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine with Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel Fuel and DOC+CDPF+SCR
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 28, 2017 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Since diesel engines have higher thermal efficiency, superior power capability and better fuel economy than gasoline engines, diesel engines are widely used in vehicles, construction machineries and agricultural machineries. However, they emit more hazardous pollutants than gasoline engines, especially particulate emissions, which have negative impacts on human’s health and air quality in cities. In order to meet future increasingly stringent regulations for particulate emissions, exhaust gas aftertreatment technologies for diesel engines are essential. Particulate emissions from a heavy-duty diesel engine which meets the China national V emission regulation were studied, and the engine was equipped with/without diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC), catalyzed diesel particulate filter (CDPF) and selective catalytic reduction (SCR). The fuel used in this article is ultra low sulfur diesel fuel whose sulfur content is less than 10 ppm. A TSI 3090 Engine Exhaust Particulate Sizer was used to study the number and size distribution of particulate emissions. Results show that with the increase of engine load, the total number of particulate emissions increases, and especially under high engine load, the increase of total particulate number is drastic in consequence of the deterioration of combustion in the cylinder. Compared with the engine without exhaust gas aftertreatment devices, DOC+CDPF+SCR can evidently reduce the particulate number by 1~2 orders of magnitude, and the decreasing range can up to 2~3 orders of magnitude when the particulate diameter is between 10~60 nm. At the maximum torque speed of 1400 rpm and rated speed of 2200 rpm, the filtration efficiency of total particulate number from the engine can be over about 95%.
CitationZhang, M., "Particulate Emissions from a China V Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine with Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel Fuel and DOC+CDPF+SCR," SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-0914, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-0914.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
- Tzamkiozis T, Ntziachristos L, Samaras Z, “Diesel passenger car PM emissions: From Euro 1 to Euro 4 with particulate filter,” Atmospheric Environment, 2010;44(7):909-16.
- Tsang K, Zhang Z, Cheung C, Chan T, “Reducing Emissions of a Diesel Engine Using Fumigation Ethanol and a Diesel Oxidation Catalyst,” ENERGY & FUELS, 2010;24:6156-65.
- Winkler A, Ferri D, Aguirre M, “The influence of chemical and thermal aging on the catalytic activity of a monolithic diesel oxidation catalyst,” Applied Catalysis B, Environmental, 2009;93(1):177-84.
- Bergmann M, Kirchner U, Vogt R, Benter T, “On-road and laboratory investigation of low-level PM emissions of a modern diesel particulate filter equipped diesel passenger car,” Atmospheric Environment, 2009;43(11):1908-16.
- Kim J, Kim C, Choung S, “Comparison studies on sintering phenomenon of diesel oxidation catalyst depending upon aging conditions,” CATALYSIS TODAY, 2012;185(1):296-301.
- He C, Li J, Ma Z, Tan J, et al, “High NO2/NOx emissions downstream of the catalytic diesel particulate filter: An influencing factor study,” JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2015;35:55-61.
- Ramdas R., Nowicka E., Jenkins R., Sellick D., et al, “Using real particulate matter to evaluate combustion catalysts for direct regeneration of diesel soot filters,” APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL, 2015;176:436-43.
- Ramdas R, Nowicka E, Jenkins R, Sellick D, Davies C, Golunski S, “Using real particulate matter to evaluate combustion catalysts for direct regeneration of diesel soot filters,” APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL, 2015;176:436-43.
- Chandler, G., Cooper, B., Harris, J., Thoss, J. et al., "An Integrated SCR and Continuously Regenerating Trap System to Meet Future NOx and PM Legislation," SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-0188, 2000, doi:10.4271/2000-01-0188.
- Conway, R., Chatterjee, S., Beavan, A., Lavenius, M. et al., "Combined SCR and DPF Technology for Heavy Duty Diesel Retrofit," SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-1862, 2005, doi:10.4271/2005-01-1862.
- Kim H, Sung Y, Jung K, Choi B, et al, “Size distributions and number concentrations of particulates from the DOC and CDPF,” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2008;22(9):1793-9.
- Tao Tang, Jun Zhang, Dongxiao Cao, Shijin Shuai, et al, “Experimental study on filtration and continuous regeneration of a particulate filter system for heavy-duty diesel engines,” Journal of Environmental Sciences: English Edition, 2014;26(12):2434-9.
- Herner J, Hu S, Robertson W, Huai T, et al, “Effect of Advanced Aftertreatment for PM and NOx Reduction on Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine Ultrafine Particulate Emissions,” ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011;45(6):2413-9.
- Schejbal M, Štěpánek J, Kočí P, Marek M, et al, “Sequence of monolithic converters DOC-CDPF-NSRC for lean exhaust gas detoxification: A simulation study,” Chemical Engineering & Processing: Process Intensification, 2010;49(9):943-52.
- Rappe K, “Integrated Selective Catalytic Reduction-Diesel Particulate Filter Aftertreatment: Insights into Pressure Drop, NOx Conversion, and Passive Soot Oxidation Behavior,” INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2014;53(45):17547-57.
- Li X.L., Wang J.S., Tu X.D., Liu W., et al, “Vertical variations of particle number concentration and size distribution in a street canyon in Shanghai, China,” Science of the Total Environment, 378 (2007) 306-316.
- Russell Armistead G., Brunekreef Bert, “A Focus on Particulate Matter and Health,” Environment Science & Technology, 2009, 43, 4620-4625.