This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Characteristic Time Analysis of SI Knock with Retarded Combustion Phasing in Boosted Engines
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 28, 2017 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
This study investigates the use of a characteristic reaction time as a possible method to speed up automotive knock calculations. In an earlier study of HCCI combustion it was found that for ignition at TDC, the ignition delay time at TDC conditions was required to be approximately 10 crank angle degrees (CAD), regardless of engine speed. In this study the analysis has been applied to knock in SI engines over a wide range of engine operating conditions including boosted operation and retarded combustion phasing, typical of high load operation of turbocharged engines. Representative pressure curves were used as input to a detailed kinetics calculation for a gasoline surrogate fuel mechanism with 312 species. The same detailed mechanism was used to compile a data set with traditional constant volume ignition delays evaluated at the peak pressure conditions in the end gas assuming adiabatic compression. For conditions with relatively early combustion phasing, the kinetic calculation predicted that auto ignition would occur at peak pressure if the ignition delay at peak pressure was in the range of 7 to 10 CAD. For retarded conditions however, the ignition delay threshold for auto-ignition at peak pressure was significantly longer and ranged from 18 to 35 CAD, due to the more gradual approach to peak pressure for retarded phasing. Additionally, at engine speeds where the compression path passed through the NTC kinetics region there was an increased tendency to knock due to significant heat release prior to final auto-ignition. This also increased the threshold ignition delay for knock. While a simple correlation of the results was not possible, the analysis points out the strong influence of retarded timing and NTC behavior on knock.
CitationLavoie, G., Middleton, R., Martz, J., Makkapati, S. et al., "Characteristic Time Analysis of SI Knock with Retarded Combustion Phasing in Boosted Engines," SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-0667, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-0667.
- Douaud, A. and Eyzat P., "Four-Octane-Number Method for Predicting the Anti-Knock Behavior of Fuels and Engines," SAE Technical Paper 780080, 1978, doi:10.4271/780080.
- Yates, A., Swarts, A., and Viljoen C. , "Correlating Auto-Ignition Delays And Knock-Limited Spark-Advance Data For Different Types Of Fuel," SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-2083, 2005, doi:10.4271/2005-01-2083.
- Babajimopoulos, A., Lavoie, G. A., and Assanis, D. N. (2007) On the Role of Top Dead Center Conditions in the Combustion Phasing of Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition Engines. Combustion Science and Technology, Vol. 179, No. 9, 2039 – 2063,
- Curran, H. J. Gaffuri, P., Pitz, W. J., and Westbrook, C. K. (2002) A comprehensive modeling study of iso-octane oxidation. Combustion and Flame, Vol. 129, No. 3, 253–280,
- Livengood, J. C., and Wu, P. C. (1955) Correlation of Autoignition Phenomena in Internal Combustion Engines and Rapid Compression Machines. Proc. Comb. Inst., Vol. 5, No., 347–356,
- He, X., . (2005) An experimental and modeling study of iso-octane ignition delay times under homogeneous charge compression ignition conditions. Combustion and Flame, Vol. 142, No. 3, 266–275,
- Mehl, M., Chen, J. Y., Pitz, W. J., Sarathy, S. M., and Westbrook, C. K. (2011) An Approach for Formulating Surrogates for Gasoline with Application toward a Reduced Surrogate Mechanism for CFD Engine Modeling. Energy Fuels, Vol. 25, No., 5215–5223,
- Mehl, M., Pitz, W. J., Westbrook, C. K., and Curran, H. J. (2011) Kinetic modeling of gasoline surrogate components and mixtures under engine conditions. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, Vol. 33, No. 1, 193–200,doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2010.05.027.
- Topinka, J., Gerty, M., Heywood, J., and Keck J. , "Knock Behavior of a Lean-Burn, H2 and CO Enhanced, SI Gasoline Engine Concept," SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-0975, 2004, doi:10.4271/2004-01-0975.
- Mittal, V., Heywood, J., and Green W. , "The Underlying Physics and Chemistry behind Fuel Sensitivity," SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 3(1):256–265, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-0617.
- Matsuura, K., Nakano, K., Shimizu, K., Iida, N., "Effect of Heat Release Pattern of Flame during Propagation on Auto-Ignition Process of End-Gas," SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-0701, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-0701.
- McCuiston, F., Lavoie, G., and Kauffman C. , "Validation of a Turbulent Flame Propagation Model for a Spark Ignition Engine," SAE Technical Paper 770045, 1977, doi:10.4271/770045.
- Stein, R., Polovina, D., Roth, K., Foster, M., "Effect of Heat of Vaporization, Chemical Octane, and Sensitivity on Knock Limit for Ethanol - Gasoline Blends," SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 5(2):823–843, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-1277.
- Kalghatgi G. , "Auto-Ignition Quality of Practical Fuels and Implications for Fuel Requirements of Future SI and HCCI Engines," SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-0239, 2005, doi:10.4271/2005-01-0239.
- Leppard W. , "The Chemical Origin of Fuel Octane Sensitivity," SAE Technical Paper 902137, 1990, doi:10.4271/902137.
- ASTM, Manual for rating motor, diesel and aviation fuels (Philadelphia, PA, 1973).