This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Influence of Compression Ratio on High Load Performance and Knock Behavior for Gasoline Port-Fuel Injection, Natural Gas Direct Injection and Blended Operation in a Spark Ignition Engine
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 28, 2017 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Natural Gas (NG) is an alternative fuel which has attracted a lot of attention recently, in particular in the US due to shale gas availability. The higher hydrogen-to-carbon (H/C) ratio, compared to gasoline, allows for decreasing carbon dioxide emissions throughout the entire engine map. Furthermore, the high knock resistance of NG allows increasing the efficiency at high engine loads compared to fuels with lower knock resistance. NG direct injection (DI) allows for fuel to be added after intake valve closing (IVC) resulting in an increase in power density compared to an injection before IVC. Steady-state engine tests were performed on a single-cylinder research engine equipped with gasoline (E10) port-fuel injection (PFI) and NG DI to allow for in-cylinder blending of both fuels. Knock investigations were performed at two discrete compression ratios (CR), 10.5 and 12.5. Operating conditions span mid-load, wide-open-throttle and boosted conditions, depending on the knock response of the fuel blend. Blended operation was performed using E10 gasoline and NG. An additional gasoline type fuel (E85) with higher knock resistance than E10 was used as a high-octane reference fuel, since the octane rating of E10-NG fuel blends is unknown. Spark timing was varied at different loads under stoichiometric conditions in order to study the knock response as well as the effects on performance and efficiency. As anticipated, results suggest that the knock resistance can be increased significantly by increasing the NG amount. Comparing the engine operation with the least knock resistant fuel, E10 PFI, and the fuel blend with the highest knock resistance, 75% NG DI, shows an increase in indicated mean effective pressure of about 9 bar at CR 12.5. The usage of reference fuels with known knock characteristics allowed an assessment of knock characteristic of intermediate E10-NG blend levels. Mathematical correlations were developed allowing characterizing the occurrence of knocking combustion by using the Livengood-Wu knock integral. For most of the fueling strategies and operating conditions, the mathematical correlations show good agreement when compared to experimental data.
CitationPamminger, M., Sevik, J., Scarcelli, R., Wallner, T. et al., "Influence of Compression Ratio on High Load Performance and Knock Behavior for Gasoline Port-Fuel Injection, Natural Gas Direct Injection and Blended Operation in a Spark Ignition Engine," SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-0661, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-0661.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
- Chang, J., Viollet, Y., Alzubail, A., Abdul-Manan, A. , "Octane-on-Demand as an Enabler for Highly Efficient Spark Ignition Engines and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Improvement," SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1264, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-1264.
- Kuzuoka, K., Kurotani, T., Chishima, H., and Kudo, H., "Study of High-Compression-Ratio Engine Combined with an Ethanol-Gasoline Fuel Separation System," SAE Int. J. Engines 7(4):1773–1780, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-2614.
- Morganti, K., Abdullah, M., Alzubail, A., Viollet, Y. , "Improving the Efficiency of Conventional Spark-Ignition Engines Using Octane-on-Demand Combustion. Part I: Engine Studies," SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-0679, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-0679.
- Morganti, K., Alzubail, A., Abdullah, M., Viollet, Y. , "Improving the Efficiency of Conventional Spark-Ignition Engines Using Octane-on-Demand Combustion - Part II: Vehicle Studies and Life Cycle Assessment," SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-0683, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-0683.
- Administration U. E. I., "Annual Energy Outlook 2015 with projections to 2040," U.S Engergy Information Administration, 2015.
- Cho H. M. and Bang-Quan H., "Spark ignition natural gas engines- A review," Energy Conversion and Management, 2007.
- Beutler M. and Naumann M., "Ein alternativer Kraftstoff fuer den Verkehrssector: Emissionsdaten verschiedener Fahrzeugklassen, Ozonbildung- und Treibhauspotential," ATZ 03, 2000.
- Husted H., Karl G., Schilling S. and Weber C., "Direct Injection of CNG for Driving Performance with Low CO2," in Aachener Kolloquium, 2014.
- Pamminger, M., Sevik, J., Scarcelli, R., Wallner, T. , "Evaluation of Knock Behavior for Natural Gas - Gasoline Blends in a Light Duty Spark Ignited Engine," SAE Int. J. Engines 9(4):2153–2165, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-2293.
- "Reaction Design," [Online]. Available: http://www.reactiondesign.com/products/chemkin/chemkin-2/. [Accessed 28 07 2016].
- Pamminger M., Sevik J., Wallner T., Scarcelli R., Hall C., Boyer B. and Wooldridge S., "PERFORMANCE, EFFICIENCY AND EMISSIONS EVALUATION OF GASOLINE PORT-FUEL INJECTION, NATURAL GAS DIRECT INJECTION AND BLENDED OPERATION," ASME, no. ICEF2016-9370, 2016.
- "AVL.com," [Online]. Available: https://www.avl.com/combustion-measurement1/-/asset_publisher/gYjUpY19vEA8/content/crank-angle-encoder-of-365-series. [Accessed 18 01 2016].
- Downs D. and Wheeler R. W., "Recent Developments in "Knock Research"," in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers: Automobile Division, 1951.
- Baral, B. and Raine, R., "Knock in a Spark Ignition Engine Fuelled with Gasoline-Kerosene Blends," SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-2417, 2008, doi:10.4271/2008-01-2417.
- Mittal, V., Revier, B., and Heywood, J., "Phenomena that Determine Knock Onset in Spark-Ignition Engines," SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0007, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-0007.
- Heywood J. B., Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1988.
- Sevik, J., Pamminger, M., Wallner, T., Scarcelli, R. , "Performance, Efficiency and Emissions Assessment of Natural Gas Direct Injection compared to Gasoline and Natural Gas Port-Fuel Injection in an Automotive Engine," SAE Int. J. Engines 9(2):1130–1142, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-0806.
- Fatouraie, M. Karwart D. M. and Wooldridge M. S., "A numerical study of the effects of primary reference fuel chemical kinetics on ignition and heat release under homogeneous reciprocating engine conditions," Combustion and Flame, no. 163, pp. 79–89, 2016.
- Tao M., Han D. and Zhao P., "An alternative approach to accommodate detailed ignition chemistry in combustion simulation," Combustion and Flame, vol. 176, pp. 400–408, 2017.
- Livengood J. and Wu P., "Correlation of Autoignition Phenomena in Internal Combustion Engines and Rapid Compression Machines," Fifth Symp. (Intl.) Comb., no. 347-356, 1955.
- Iqbal A., Selmet A., Reese R. and Roger V., "Ignition Delay Correlation for Predicting Autoignition of a Toluene Reference Fuel Blend in Spark Ignition Engines," 2011.
- Fox, J., Cheng, W., and Heywood, J., "A Model for Predicting Residual Gas Fraction in Spark-Ignition Engines," SAE Technical Paper 931025, 1993, doi:10.4271/931025.
- Kalghatgi, G., Morganti, K., Algunaibet, I., Sarathy, M. , "Knock Prediction Using a Simple Model for Ignition Delay," SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-0702, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-0702.
- Kalghatgi, G., Babiker, H., and Badra, J., "A Simple Method to Predict Knock Using Toluene, N-Heptane and Iso-Octane Blends (TPRF) as Gasoline Surrogates," SAE Int. J. Engines 8(2):505–519, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-0757.o
- Andrae J. C. G., "Development of a Detailed Kinetic Model for Gasoline Surrogate Fuels," vol. 87, no. no 10-11, pp. 2013–2022, 2008.