This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Developing a 55% BTE Commercial Heavy-Duty Opposed-Piston Engine without a Waste Heat Recovery System
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 28, 2017 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Heavy-duty vehicles, currently the second largest source of fuel consumption and carbon emissions are projected to be fastest growing mode in transportation sector in future. There is a clear need to increase fuel efficiency and lower emissions for these engines. The Opposed-Piston Engine (OP Engine) has the potential to address this growing need. In this paper, results are presented for a 9.8L three-cylinder two-stroke OP Engine that shows the potential of achieving 55% brake thermal efficiency (BTE), while simultaneously satisfying emission targets for tail pipe emissions. The two-stroke OP Engines are inherently more cost effective due to less engine parts. The OP Engine architecture presented in this paper can meet this performance without the use of waste heat recovery systems or turbo-compounding and hence is the most cost effective technology to deliver this level of fuel efficiency.
In this paper, engine performance results are presented for the 9.8L two-stroke OP Engine that employs currently available engine components, such as supercharger, turbocharger and after-treatment and features a uniquely designed piston bowl shape to enhance mixing with a swirl-to-tumble conversion as the piston bowls approach minimum volume. This design improves fuel-air mixing and hence, results in low soot values, increased indicated thermal efficiency (ITE) - due to better combustion phasing because of faster mixing controlled combustion, and lower NOx because of improved area-to-volume ratio and lower fueling requirement per cycle. Results are presented from the two-stroke OP Engine-specific 1-D and 3-D CFD models developed for correlation to the three-cylinder 4.9L two-stroke research engine dynamometer measured data. These correlated models were used as tools to make predictions for the 9.8L heavy-duty engine. The optimized system includes a high trapped compression ratio piston bowl, ports design to provide best scavenging performance, thermal barrier coating on piston bowls and dual injector with an optimized spray pattern layout. Engine performance results are presented at three speed-load points. Results show that the two-stroke OP Engine result in a BTE of 55%, while meeting stringent emission standards without the use of expensive waste heat recovery systems and/or turbo-compounding components.
CitationAbani, N., Nagar, N., Zermeno, R., chiang, M. et al., "Developing a 55% BTE Commercial Heavy-Duty Opposed-Piston Engine without a Waste Heat Recovery System," SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-0638, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-0638.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 5]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 6]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 7]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 8]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 9]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 10]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 11]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 12]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 13]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 14]|
- “EPA and NHTSA Propose Greenhouse Gas and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Trucks: By the Numbers”, https://www3.epa.gov/otaq/climate/documents/420f15903.pdf, EPA-420-F-15-903, June 2015.
- Delgado, O, and Lutsey, N., “The U.S. SuperTruck Program: Expediting the development of Advanced heady-Duty Vehicle Efficiency Technologies”, International Council of Clean Transportation, June 2014.
- Koeberlein, D., “Technology and System Level Demonstration of Highly Efficient and Clean, Diesel Powered Class 8 Trucks,” http://energy.gov/eere/vehicles/vehicle-technologies-office-annual-merit-review-presentations, Department of Energy report, project ID: ACE057, 2015.
- Singh, S., “Recovery Act - Class 8 Truck Freight Efficiency Improvement Project”, http://energy.gov/eere/vehicles/vehicle-technologies/office-annual-merit-review-presentations, Department of Energy report, project ID: ACE058, June 2015.
- Zukouski, R., “SuperTruck - Development and Demonstration of a Fuel-Efficient Class 8 Tractor & Trailer Engine Systems”, http://energy.gov/eere/vehicles/vehicle-technologies/office-annual-merit-review-presentations, Department of Energy report, project ID: ACE059, 2016.
- Amar, P., Gibble, J., “SuperTruck Powertrain Technologies for Efficiency Improvement”, http://energy.gov/eere/vehicles/vehicle-technologies-office-annual-merit-review-presentations, Department of Energy report, project ID: ACE060, 2016.
- Hanson, R., Kokjohn, S., Splitter, D., and Reitz, R., "An Experimental Investigation of Fuel Reactivity Controlled PCCI Combustion in a Heavy-Duty Engine," SAE Int. J. Engines 3(1):700-716, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-0864.
- Kokjohn, S.L., Hanson, R.M., Splitter, D.A., and Reitz, R.D., "Fuel Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition (RCCI): A Pathway to Controlled High-Efficiency Clean Combustion," International Journal of Engine Research, Special Issue on Fuel Efficiency, Vol. 12, pp. 209-226, 2011.
- Hanson, R., Ickes, A., and Wallner, T., "Comparison of RCCI Operation with and without EGR over the Full Operating Map of a Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine," SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-0794, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-0794.
- Manente, V., Zander, C., Johansson, B., Tunestal, P. et al., "An Advanced Internal Combustion Engine Concept for Low Emissions and High Efficiency from Idle to Max Load Using Gasoline Partially Premixed Combustion," SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-2198, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-2198.
- Chang, J., Kalghatgi, G., Amer, A., Adomeit, P. et al., "Vehicle Demonstration of Naphtha Fuel Achieving Both High Efficiency and Drivability with EURO6 Engine-Out NOx Emission," SAE Int. J. Engines 6(1):101-119, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-0267.
- Sharma, A. and Redon, F., "Multi-Cylinder Opposed-Piston Engine Results on Transient Test Cycle," SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-1019, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-1019.
- Regner, G., Herold, R., Wahl, M., Dion, E. et al., "The Achates Power Opposed-Piston Two-Stroke Engine: Performance and Emissions Results in a Medium-Duty Application," SAE Int. J. Engines 4(3):2726-2735, 2011, doi:10.4271/2011-01-2221.
- Naik, S., Redon, F., Regner, G., and Koszewnik, J., "Opposed-Piston 2-Stroke Multi-Cylinder Engine Dynamometer Demonstration," SAE Technical Paper 2015-26-0038, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-26-0038.
- Redon, F., Kalebjian, C., Kessler, J., Rakovec, N. et al., "Meeting Stringent 2025 Emissions and Fuel Efficiency Regulations with an Opposed-Piston, Light-Duty Diesel Engine," SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-1187, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-1187.
- Venugopal, R., Abani, N., and MacKenzie, R., "Effects of Injection Pattern Design on Piston Thermal Management in an Opposed-Piston Two-Stroke Engine," SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-2423, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-2423.
- Herold, R., Wahl, M., Regner, G., Lemke, J. et al., "Thermodynamic Benefits of Opposed-Piston Two-Stroke Engines," SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-2216, 2011, doi:10.4271/2011-01-2216.
- Dion, E. P., Lenski, B. M.., and Mackenzie, R. G., “Piston constructions for opposed-piston engines” US 20120073526, 2012.
- Senecal, P., Richards, K., Pomraning, E., Yang, T. et al., "A New Parallel Cut-Cell Cartesian CFD Code for Rapid Grid Generation Applied to In-Cylinder Diesel Engine Simulations," SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0159, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-0159.
- Patel, A., Kong, S., and Reitz, R., "Development and Validation of a Reduced Reaction Mechanism for HCCI Engine Simulations," SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-0558, 2004, doi:10.4271/2004-01-0558.
- Kong S.C., Sun Y., and Reitz R.D., Modeling diesel spray flame lift-off, sooting tendency and NOx emissions using detailed chemistry with phenomenological soot models, ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 129 (2007), pp. 245-251.
- Smith G.P., Golden D.M., Frenklach M., Moriarty N.W., Eiteneer B., Goldenberg M., Bowman C.T., Hanson R.K., Song S., Gardiner W.C., Lissianski V.V., and Qin Z., 2000 [http://www.me.berkeley.edu/gri-mech/]
- Hiroyasu, H. and Kadota, T., "Models for Combustion and Formation of Nitric Oxide and Soot in Direct Injection Diesel Engines," SAE Technical Paper 760129, 1976, doi:10.4271/760129.
- Nagle, J., and Strickland-Constable, R.F., “Oxidation of Carbon Between 1000-2000 C,” Proceedings of the Fifth Carbon Conference, Vol. 1, p.154, 1962.
- Patterson, M.A., “Modeling the Effects of Fuel Injection Characteristics on Diesel Combustion and Emissions,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1997.
- Abani, N., and Reitz, R.D., “Diesel engine emissions and combustion predictions using advanced mixing models applicable to fuel sprays”, Combustion Theory and Modelling, Vol. 14, Iss. 5, pp 715-746, 2010.
- O’Rourke, P.J., “Collective Drop Effects on Vaporizing Liquid Sprays,” Ph.D. Thesis, Princeton University, 1981.
- Han, Z., and Reitz, R.D., “Turbulence Modeling of Internal Combustion Engines Using RNG k-ϵ Models,” Combustion Science and Technology, Vol. 106, 1995.
- Klyza, C., “Optical Measurement Methods used in Calibration and Validation of Modeled Injection Spray Characteristics,” Poster P7, presented in the 2010 Directions in Engine-Efficiency and Emissions Research (DEER) Conference.
- Abani, N., Kokjohn, S., Park, S., Bergin, M. et al., "An Improved Spray Model for Reducing Numerical Parameter Dependencies in Diesel Engine CFD Simulations," SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-0970, 2008, doi:10.4271/2008-01-0970.
- Taraza, D., Henein, N., Ceausu, R., and Bryzik, W., "Engine Friction Model for Transient Operation of Turbocharged, Common Rail Diesel Engines," SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-1460, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-1460.
- Stanley, R., Taraza, D., Henein, N., and Bryzik, W., "A Simplified Friction Model of the Piston Ring Assembly," SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-0974, 1999, doi:10.4271/1999-01-0974.
- Taraza, D., Henein, N., and Bryzik, W., "Friction Losses in Multi-Cylinder Diesel Engines," SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-0921, 2000, doi:10.4271/2000-01-0921.
- Hersey, M. D., “Theory and Research in Lubrication: Foundations for Future Developments”, pp. 44-47, John Wiley & Sons, 1966.
- “Gears - Thermal capacity, Part 2: Thermal load-carrying capacity,” ISO/TR 14179-2:2001(E), First edition 2001-08-01, ISO 2001, 2001.
- Praca, M., Uehara, S., Ferreira, M., and Mian, O., "New Polymeric Coating on Sputtered Bearings for Heavy Duty Diesel Engines," SAE Int. J. Engines 6(1):623-628, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-1724.
- Hoppe, S. and Kantola, T., "DuroGlide® - New Generation Piston Ring Coating for Fuel-Efficient Commercial Vehicle Engines," SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-2323, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-2323.
- Reichert, J., and Schäfer, P., “Reduced Friction in Engine Sealing System for Truck Engines,” MTZ World (2010) 71: 30. doi:10.1007/BF03227989
- SwRI NHSTA 812194 report, http://www.nhtsa.gov/Laws-&-Regulations/CAFE---Fuel-Economy/supporting-phase-2-proposal, 2014.