This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Evaluating Different Measures to Improve the Numerical Simulation of the Mixture Formation in a Spark-Ignition CNG-DI-Engine
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 28, 2017 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) is a promising alternative fuel for internal combustion engines as its combustion is fuel-efficient and lean in carbon dioxide compared to gasoline. The high octane number of methane gives rise to significant increase of the thermodynamic efficiency due to higher possible compression ratios. In order to use this potential, new stratified mixture formation concepts for CNG are investigated by means of numerical fluid simulations. For decades RANS methods have been the industry standard to model three-dimensional flows. Indeed, there are well-known deficiencies of the widely used eddy viscosity turbulence models based on the applied Boussinesq hypothesis. Reynolds stress turbulence models as well as scale resolving simulation approaches can be appealing alternative choices since they offer higher accuracy. However, due to their large computing effort, they are still mostly impractical for the daily use in industrial product development processes. A more suitable solution seems to be the application of an explicit algebraic Reynolds stress (EARSM) turbulence model based on a non-linear relation between the Reynolds stresses and the mean strain-rate. This allows a better prediction of various flow effects in the simulations. In the presented work the direct injection of CNG has been simulated by means of commercial RANS-based CFD using various turbulence models. The simulation set-up includes the discretization of one cylinder and part of the centrally mounted injector geometry. High pressure ratios are present in between the rail and the cylinder resulting in a supersonic gas jet emerging from the injector and mixing into the surrounding air. Mass transfer in between both components is modeled by a passive scalar transport equation based on the gradient diffusion hypothesis using a constant global turbulent Schmidt number. It is shown in this work that the capturing of anisotropic turbulence effects is crucial for the correct modeling of the mixture formation because turbulent diffusion is dominant in the mixing layer of supersonic gas jets. Overall an explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model predicts more pronounced mixing and shows better agreement with experimental data than the commonly used eddy viscosity turbulence models.
CitationTwellmeyer, A., Kopple, F., and Weigand, B., "Evaluating Different Measures to Improve the Numerical Simulation of the Mixture Formation in a Spark-Ignition CNG-DI-Engine," SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-0567, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-0567.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
- Baumgarten, C. “Mixture Formation in Internal Combustion Engines”, Berlin Heidelberg New York:Springer-Verlag, 2006.
- Rutland, C. “Large-eddy simulations for internal combustion engines - a review,” International Journal of Engine Research, 2011, doi:10.1177/1468087411407248
- Versteeg, H. K. and Malalasekera, W. “An introduction to computational fluid dynamics: the finite volume method”, Harlow: Pearson Education Limited, 2007.
- Launder, B. and Spalding, D. B. “The Numerical Computation of Turbulent Flows,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 3(2), 269–289, 1974, doi:10.1016/0045-7825(74)90029-2
- Menter, F. R. “Performance of Popular Turbulence Models for Attached and Separated Adverse Pressure Gradient Flows,” AIAA Journal 30(8), 2066–2072, 1992, doi:10.2514/3.11180
- Wilcox, D. C. “Reassessment of the Scale-determining Equation for Advanced Turbulence Models,” AIAA Journal 26(11), 1299–1310, 1988, doi:10.2514/3.10041
- Menter, F. R. “Zonal Two Equation k-omega Turbulence Models for Aerodynamic Flows,” AIAA Paper 2906, 1993.
- Wallin, S. and Johansson, A. “An explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model for incompressible and compressible turbulent flows,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics 403, 89–132, 2000.
- Ferziger, J. H. and Peric, M. “Numerische Strömungsmechanik”, Berlin Heidelberg New York:Springer-Verlag, 2008.
- Tominagaa, Y. and Stathapoulos, T. “Turbulent Schmidt numbers for CFD analysis with various types of flowfield,” Atmospheric Environment 41(37), 8091–8099, 2007, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.054
- Koeltzsch, K. “The height dependence of the turbulent Schmidt number within the boundary layer,” Atmospheric Environment 34(7), 1147–1151, 2000, doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00369-6
- Friedrich, W., Grzeszik, R., and Wensing, M., “Mixture Formation in a CNG-DI Engine in Stratified Operation,” SAE Technical Paper 2015-24-2474, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-24-2474.
- Yimer, I., Campbell, I. and Jiang, L.-Y. “Estimation of the Turbulent Schmidt Number from Experimental Profiles of Axial Velocity and Concentration for High-Reynolds-Number Jet Flows,” Canadian Aeronautics and Space Journal 48(3), 195–200, 2002, doi:10.5589/q02-024