This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Sensitivity Study on Inertance Frequency Response Function through Non-Parametric Variability Approach
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 28, 2017 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
In recent years, there is increasing demand for every CAE engineer on their confidence level of the virtual simulation results due to the upfront robust design requirement during early stage of an automotive product development. Apart from vehicle feel factor NVH characteristics, there are certain vibration target requirements at system or component level which need to be addressed during design stage itself in order to achieve the desired functioning during vehicle operating conditions. Vehicle passive safety system is one which primarily consists of acceleration sensors, control module and air-bag deployment system. Control module’s decision is based on accelerometer sensor signals so that its mounting locations should meet the sufficient inertance or dynamic stiffness performance in order to avoid distortion in signals due to its structural resonances. During design stage, the inertance or dynamic stiffness can be assessed through the finite element (FE) based technique of modal frequency response function (FRF) analysis. FE model is deterministic and the modal frequency response function results are sensitive to the modeling techniques especially at the high frequencies due to the high modal densities. Hence the correlation of FRF results between test and simulation are highly challenging especially at the mid and high frequency band. In this paper a passive safety system control module mounting bracket is considered for the drive point FRF analysis and the correlation at system level is performed by simulating the physical bench test condition. The non-parametric variability method (NPVM) approach is used to study the system level vibration response variations due to the uncertainties in finite element modeling. Finally the updating of finite element model is made to improve the correlation level in terms of covering the test FRF response within FE results variability envelope is also highlighted in this scope of study.
CitationArunachalam, M., S, A., Sampath, P., Haiyum, A. et al., "A Sensitivity Study on Inertance Frequency Response Function through Non-Parametric Variability Approach," SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-0445, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-0445.
- Christian Soize, “A nonparametric model of random uncertainties for reduced matrix models in structural dynamics”, Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, Elsevier, 2000, 15 (3), pp. 277-294.
- Christian Soize, “Stochastic modeling of uncertainties in computational structural dynamics - Recent theoretical advances”, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Elsevier, 2013, 332(10), pp. 2379-2395.
- Durand, J., Gagliardini, L., and Soize, C., "Nonparametric Modeling of the Variability of Vehicle Vibroacoustic Behavior," SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-2385, 2005, doi:10.4271/2005-01-2385.
- Legault J., Woodhouse J., Langley R.S., “Comparison of two nonparametric models of uncertainty in structural dynamics”, ISMA proceedings, 2012.
- Jean-Pierre Coyette, “Sources of uncertainties in vibro-acoustic simulations”, Free Field Technologies S.A, Belgium.
- Tom Irvine., “An Introduction to Frequency Response Functions”, Vibrationdata.com Publications, Aug.2000.
- Arunachalam, M., Arunkumar, S., Sampath, P., Haiyum, A. et al., "An Investigation of Body Inertance Response for Occupant Safety Control Module Attachment Regions," SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-0473, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-0473.
- MSC/NASTRAN, Quick Reference Guide: basic and advanced dynamic guides, 2010.
- MSC/ACTRAN, Version16.0 Users Guide Vol1&Vol2 guides, 2016.