This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Automobile Tail Door
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 28, 2017 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Stringent emission norms by government and higher fuel economy targets have urged automotive companies to look beyond conventional methods of optimization to achieve an optimal design with minimum mass, which also meets the desired level of performance targets at the system as well as at vehicle level. In conventional optimization method, experts from each domain work independently to improve the performance based on their domain knowledge which may not lead to optimum design considering the performance parameters of all domain. It is time consuming and tedious process as it is an iterative method. Also, it fails to highlight the conflicting design solutions. With an increase in computational power, automotive companies are now adopting Multi-Disciplinary Optimization (MDO) approach which is capable of handling heterogeneous domains in parallel. It facilitates to understand the limitations of performances of all domains to achieve good balance between them. The paper presents the MDO of a Tail door of a sports utility vehicle (SUV) which is carried out at the stage where major structural design has been finalized, and the only gauge of the tail door panels can be taken for design variables. The objective of the exercise was to minimize the mass while meeting various performance parameters. Modal and frequency response function (FRF) load cases are considered for noise vibration and harshness (NVH) domain and stiffness load cases for durability domain. Crashworthiness domain load cases for the tail door were not considered here because crash norms are not applicable for rear impact. Response surface based optimization method has been selected for the optimization considering resource availability and dexterity of being applied in various domains. A sensitivity study was used to identify critical panels for each performance parameter. Broken constraint charts were studied to identify the load cases which limit the mass reduction opportunity. The study showed twelve percent of mass saving which is significant for automotive doors.
CitationSharma, S., Sahu, A., and Bhosale, S., "Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Automobile Tail Door," SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-0251, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-0251.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
- Fukushima, J., Suzuki, K., and Kikuchi, N., "Shape and Topology Optimization of a Car Body with Multiple Loading Conditions," SAE Technical Paper 920777, 1992, doi:10.4271/920777.
- Gowardhan Praful, Khadsare Chetan, Virmalwar Ajay and Bhirud Pankaj, "Optimization of Tailgate Hinge Reinforcement Panel,” presented at Altair Technology-CON 2015, India, 2015.
- Gao, Y., Feng, H., Gao, D., and Xu, R., "Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of a Hatchback Structure,” SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-0780, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-0780.
- Liu, X. and Jiang, S., "A DOE Based Approach to Multi-Response Optimization,"SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-0880, 2003, doi:10.4271/2003-01-0880.
- Bhosale, S., Malladi, A., and Londhe, A., "Comparing Various Multi-Disciplinary Optimization Approaches for Performance Enhancement and Weight Reduction of a Vehicle Chassis Frame,"SAE Int. J. Mater. Manf. 9(2):430–435, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-0305.
- Rakowska, J., Chator, A., Barthelemy, B., Lee M., , "An Iterative Application of Multi-Disciplinary Optimization for Vehicle Body Weight Reduction Based on 2015 Mustang Product Development,"SAE Int. J. Mater. Manf. 8(3):685–692, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-0470.
- Chuang, C., Li, G., and Yang, R., "An Optimization and Trade-Off Process for Crashworthiness with Multiple Responses,"SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-1543, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-1543.