Cooling Package Selection through Radiator Area/Material and Fan Blade Angle Variation
Published October 25, 2016 by SAE International in United States
Annotation of this paper is available
This work aims to demonstrate a cooling package selection for an agricultural machine equipped with Diesel engine considering different radiators area / material and fan blade angles, pursuing the best match of performance, cost and weight.
It was investigated two types of radiators made from copper-brass and aluminum, two types of charge air cooler varying the dimensions and four types of fans varying the blade angle.
The selection method chosen was the experimental testing. The tests were performed according to the standard SAE and internal procedures at MWM Motores Diesel laboratories located at São Paulo / Brazil.
When compared with cooper-brass, the aluminum radiator presents worse heat exchange performance what makes its size increase in order to compensate the gap. Even with bigger size, the aluminum radiator keeps lighter and cheaper.
The fan with bigger angle blade can deliver more airflow helping the overall cooling package performance but in other hand, some specific issues should be taken care such as the increase of fan noise.
CitationSelim, A. and de Lyra, B., "Cooling Package Selection through Radiator Area/Material and Fan Blade Angle Variation," SAE Technical Paper 2016-36-0370, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-36-0370.
- Shehal Patel, Siddiq Diwan Mohammed, “Construction detail and investigation of radiator with cost analysis and material selection”, International Journal For Technological Research In Engineering, ISSN (online): 2347-4718.
- Brent Kooiman, PE, “Aluminum vs. Copper Conductors a Serious Alternative?”, A white paper discussing the pros and cons of aluminum vs. copper conductors in real-world industrial applications”, Interestates engineering forum 2011.
- Larry Pryor, P.E. et al, “A comparison of aluminum vs copper as used in electrical equipment”, 5-08.
- Selim, André and Lyra, Bruno, “Avaliação do sistema de arrefecimento motor 6.10TCA 240 cv aplicação pulverizadora”, MWM technical report ENG-128/14.
- SAE J 1393 : 2002, “Heavy Duty Cooling Test Code R”, Surface vehicle recommended practice.
- ATP-001 rev. 01 2014, “Application Evaluation - Cooling test”, MWM internal procedure.