This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Boosting Technologies and Limits for Small Combustion Engines
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published November 08, 2016 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Two-cylinder engines not only have special demands concerning uniformity and dynamics of oscillating masses and firing order, but also place very different demands on the turbocharger. With two-cylinder engines, the pulsating influence grows and changes the operation of the turbine. In this paper different boosting technologies are compared in small engine applications. Besides turbochargers the potentials and limits of superchargers and electric chargers are compared as well as their combinations. These technologies show differences concerning power supply, operation range and efficiency, and these effects have different implications in small engines. The efficiency of a turbo compressor, for example decreases, rapidly for small dimensions. Results from experiments and engine process simulations are shown based on a two-cylinder engine of 0.8l displacement. The operating condition of a turbocharger turbine in a two-cylinder engine is very specific due to exhaust pulsations. To understand this, a comparison was made with a four-cylinder engine based on numerical analyses. For the boundary conditions of the model, results of models from GT-Power simulations are used. Performing CFD-simulations, the turbine is driven by a two-and a four-cylinder-pulse, whereas both operations use the same specific exhaust enthalpy across one full engine cycle. In this regard, the pulsating operation of a small four-cylinder engine can be simulated and compared with those of a two-cylinder engine. The results show that for the optimization of a two-cylinder engine’s turbocharger, it is necessary to consider the specific pulse characteristics.
CitationBaar, R., Boxberger, V., and Gern, M., "Boosting Technologies and Limits for Small Combustion Engines," SAE Technical Paper 2016-32-0077, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-32-0077.
- Aymanns , R. Scharf , J. , Uhlmann , T. et al. A Revision of Quasi Steady Modelling in the Simulation of Pulse Charged Engines, 16 Aufladetechnische Konferenz September 2011
- Cao , T. , Xu , L. , Yang , M. et al. Radial Turbine Rotor Response to Pulsating Inlet Flows Journal of Turbomachinery 2014 July 2014 136/071003-1
- Lüddecke , B. , Filsinger , D. , Bargende , M. Engine crank angle resolved turbocharger turbine performance measurements by contactless shaft torque detection 11th International Conference on Turbochargers and Turbocharging May 2014
- Reuter , S. , Koch , A. Erweiterung des Turbinenkennfeldes durch ein innovatives Messverfahren als Randbedingung für die Ladungswechselsimulation, 15 Aufladetechnische Konferenz September 2010
- Pucher , P. Zinner K. Aufladung von Verbrennungsmotoren Springer Verlag 4th February 2012
- Roclawski , H. ; Gugau , M. et al. Influence on Degree of Reaction on Turbine Performance for Pulsating Flow Conditions ASME Turbo Expo June 2014
- Schernus , C. , Dietrich , C. , Nebbia , C. et al. Turboaufladung für kleine Ottomotoren mit weniger als vier Zylindern Motorprozesssimulation und Aufladung, III: Engine Process Simulation and Supercharging May 2011
- Vogt , M. Aufladesysteme für Ottomotoren im Vergleich Dissertation Fachgebiet Verbrennungskraftmaschinen, Technische Universität Berlin December 2009
- Weinowski , R. , Sehr , A. , Wedowski , S. et al. Zukünftiges Downsizing bei Ottomotoren- Potentiale und Grenzen von 2- und 3- Zylinder Konzepten, 30 Internationales Wiener Motorsymposium May 2009
- Zillmer , M. , Hadler , J. , Jelden , H. et al. The Drivetrain for the New Volkswagen “1-Litre Car 20th Aachener Colloquium: Automobile and Engine Technology 2011 October 2011
- Ernst , B. , Kammeyer , J. , Seume J.R. IMPROVED MAP SCALING METHODS FOR SMALL TURBOCHARGER GT2011-45345, Proceedings of ASME Turbo 2011 June 6-10, 2011 Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada