This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Fan Shroud Optimization Using Adjoint Solver
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published September 27, 2016 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Fan and fan-shroud design is critical for underhood air flow management. The objective of this work is to demonstrate a method to optimize fan-shroud shape in order to maximize cooling air mass flow rates through the heat exchangers using the Adjoint Solver in STAR-CCM+®. Such techniques using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analysis enable the automotive/transport industry to reduce the number of costly experiments that they perform. This work presents the use of CFD as a simulation tool to investigate and assess the various factors that can affect the vehicle thermal performance.
In heavy-duty trucks, the cooling package includes heat exchangers, fan-shroud, and fan. In this work, the STAR-CCM+® solver was selected and a java macro built to run the primal flow and the Adjoint solutions sequentially in an automated fashion. In this analysis, the primal flow provides flow information (e.g. velocity, temperature and pressure) and the Adjoint solver provides surface morphing details w.r.t. max or min of the specified objective function. In the present work, the fan-shroud surface morphing was performed based on the maximum air mass flow rate through the heat exchanger outlet w.r.t. the spatial positions of the fan-shroud surface. An overall 1.4% increase in cooling air mass flow was observed in the heat exchanger with the optimized/morphed fan-shroud surface. The identified main optimized locations were mainly at the sharp edges of the original manufactured fan-shroud. Further evaluation is underway to maximize the cooling air mass flow benefit.
CitationVegendla, P., Sofu, T., Saha, R., Madurai Kumar, M. et al., "Fan Shroud Optimization Using Adjoint Solver," SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-8070, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-8070.
- Davis, F., Veling, T., Caltrider, J., and Madhavar, R., "Impact of Computer Aided Engineering on Ford Motor Company Light Truck Cooling Design and Development Processes," SAE Technical Paper 932977, 1993, doi:10.4271/932977.
- Fellague, K., Hu, S., and Willoughby, D., "Determination of the Effects of Inlet Air Velocity and Temperature Distributions on the Performance of an Automotive Radiator," SAE Technical Paper 940771, 1994, doi:10.4271/940771.
- Hsu, I. and Schwartz, W., "Simulation of the Thermal Environment Surrounding an Underbody Fuel Tank in a Passenger Vehicle Using Orthogonally Structured and Body-Fitted Unstructured CFD Codes in Series," SAE Technical Paper 950616, 1995, doi:10.4271/950616.
- Srinivasa, V., S, R., and Shome, B., "Design of Experiments Enabled CFD Approach for Optimizing Cooling Fan Performance," SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-0658, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-0658.
- Mehravaran, M. and Zhang, Y., "Optimizing the Geometry of Fan-Shroud Assembly Using CFD," SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1336, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-1336.
- GILES, M. B.; PIERCE N. A., An Introduction to the Adjoint Approach to Design, Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 65, 393-415, 2000.
- Hinterberger, C. and Olesen, M., "Automatic Geometry Optimization of Exhaust Systems Based on Sensitivities Computed by a Continuous Adjoint CFD Method in OpenFOAM," SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-1278, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-1278.
- Han, T., Kaushik, S., Gin, R., and Bot, E., "Adjoint Method for Aerodynamic Shape Improvement," SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-0167, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-0167.
- Rainer, M., Haase, G., Basara, B., and Offner, G., "Shape Optimization by an Adjoint Solver based on a near-wall Turbulence Model," SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1358, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-1358.
- Magazoni, F., Buscariolo, F., Maruyama, F., Alves, J. et al., "Aerodynamic Shape Improvement for Driver Side View Mirror of Hatchback Vehicle using Adjoint Optimization Method," SAE Technical Paper 2015-36-0156, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-36-0156.