This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Design of a Reconfigurable Assembly Cell for Multiple Aerostructures
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published September 27, 2016 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
This paper presents novel development of a reconfigurable assembly cell which assembles multiple aerostructure products. Most aerostructure assembly systems are designed to produce one variant only. For multiple variants, each assembly typically has a dedicated assembly cell, despite most assemblies requiring a process of drilling and fastening to similar tolerances. Assembly systems that produce more than one variant do exist but have long changeover or involve extensive retrofitting. Quick assembly of multiple products using one assembly system offers significant cost savings from reductions in capital expenditure and lead time.
Recent trends advocate Reconfigurable Assembly Systems (RAS) as a solution; designed to have exactly the functionality necessary to produce a group of similar components. A state-of-the-art review finds significant benefits in deploying RAS for a group of aerostructures variants. What’s more, improvements to robot accuracy and decreasing costs of capital equipment means reconfigurable systems are becoming more economically viable. Designing the part family for commonality and robotic assembly from the outset enables the assembly system to be quickly customised to each variant using modular tooling. A novel design framework is introduced to manage the design complexity and iterations between design and manufacturing. The framework innovation restructures the design process so design and manufacturing teams can collaborate precisely on structural design for assembly, enabling reconfigurability with the use of common assembly processes. The work presents the development of a RAS demonstrator and wingbox which is designed using the framework.
CitationJefferson, T., Crossley, R., Smith, A., and Ratchev, S., "Design of a Reconfigurable Assembly Cell for Multiple Aerostructures," SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-2105, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-2105.
- Airbus S.A.S, “Airbus Global Market Forecast Book 2014-2033,” 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.airbus.com/company/market/forecast/
- The Boeing Company, “Boeing Current Market Outlook 2014-2033,” 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/commercial/cmo/pdf/Boeing_Current_Market_Outlook_2014.pdf
- Schmale J., Shindell D., Schneidemesser E. Von, Chabay I., and Lawrence M., “Air pollution: Clean up our skies,” Nature, vol. 515, pp. 335-337, 2014.
- Clean Sky Joint Undertaking, “The Clean Sky JTI (Joint Technology Initiative).” 2012.
- Millar, A. and Kihlman, H., "Reconfigurable Flexible Tooling for Aerospace Wing Assembly," SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-3243, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-3243.
- Bi Z. M., Wang L., and Lang S. Y. T., “Current status of reconfigurable assembly systems,” Int. J. Manuf. Res., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 303-328, 2007.
- Lotter B. and Wiendahl H. P., “Changeable and Reconfigurable Assembly Systems,” in Changeable and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems, ElMaraghy H. A., Ed. Springer London, 2009, pp. 127-142 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-067-8_7
- Dashchenko A. I., Reconfigurable manufacturing systems and transformable factories. Springer, 2006.
- Lee S., Suárez R., and Choi B.-W., Frontiers of Assembly and Manufacturing. Springer, 2010.
- Schuh G., Neugebauer R., and Uhlmann E., Future Trends in Production Engineering: Proceedings of the First Conference of the German Academic Society for Production Engineering (WGP), Berlin, Germany, 8th-9th June 2011. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
- Meichsner T. P., “Migration Manufacturing-A New Concept for Automotive Body Production,” in Changeable and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems, Springer, 2009, pp. 373-388.
- Al-Zaher A. and ElMaraghy W., “Design Method of Under-body Platform Automotive Framing Systems,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 17, pp. 380-385, 2014.
- Koren Y. and Shpitalni M., “Design of reconfigurable manufacturing systems,” J. Manuf. Syst., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 130-141, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278612511000021
- Simpson T. W., Jiao J. R., Siddique Z., and Hölttä-Otto K., “Advances in product family and product platform design,” New YorN Springer, 2014.
- McKeown C. and Webb P., “A reactive reconfigurable tool for aerospace structures,” Assem. Autom., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 334-343, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01445151111172916
- Jayaweera, N., Bakker, O., Smith, T., Popov, A. et al., "Flexible Tooling for Wing Box Rib Clamping and Drilling," SAE Int. J. Aerosp. 4(2):1048-1056, 2011, doi:10.4271/2011-01-2639.
- Bakker, O., Jayaweera, N., Martin, O., Turnock, A. et al., "Fixturing and Tooling for Wing Assembly with Reconfigurable Datum System Pickup," SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-2556, 2011, doi:10.4271/2011-01-2556.
- Meyer M. H. and Lehnerd A. P., “The power of product platforms: building value and cost leadership. 1997,” New York, NY, vol. 10020, p. 39.
- Simpson T. W., Siddique Z., and Jiao R. J., Product platform and product family design: methods and applications. Springer Science & Business Media, 2006.
- Buiga A., “Investigating the role of MQB platform in Volkswagen Group’s strategy and automobile industry,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 391-399, 2012.
- Wilhelm B., “Platform and modular concepts at Volkswagen-their effects on the assembly process,” in Transforming automobile assembly, Springer, 1997, pp. 146-156.
- Ashraf M. and Hasan F., “Product family formation based on multiple product similarities for a reconfigurable manufacturing system,” Int. J. Model. Oper. Manag., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 247-265, 2015.
- Kashkoush M. and ElMaraghy H., “Product family formation for reconfigurable assembly systems,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 17, pp. 302-307, 2014.
- Galan R., Racero J., Eguia I., and Garcia J. M., “A systematic approach for product families formation in Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems,” Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 489-502, 2007.
- Jenkinson L. R., Simpkin P., and Rhodes D., “Civil jet aircraft design,” 2006.
- Niu M. C.-Y., Airframe structural design: practical design information and data on aircraft structures. Conmilit Press Limited, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://www.air.flyingway.com/books/Airframe-Stuctural-Design.pdf
- Bryan A., Ko J., Hu S. J., and Koren Y., “Co-evolution of product families and assembly systems,” CIRP Ann. Technol., vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 41-44, 2007.
- Deif A. M. and ElMaraghy W. H., “A systematic design approach for reconfigurable manufacturing systems,” in Advances in Design, Springer, 2006, pp. 219-228.
- Francalanza E., Borg J., and Constantinescu C., “Deriving a Systematic Approach to Changeable Manufacturing System Design,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 17, pp. 166-171, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827114003722. [Accessed: 26-Jan-2015]
- European Commission, “Flightpath 2050. Europe’s Vision for Aviation,” Rep. High Lev. Gr. Aviat. Res. Publ. Off. Eur. Union, Luxemb., 2011.
- Kihlman, H. and Engström, M., "Affordable Reconfigurable Tooling," SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-2645, 2002, doi:10.4271/2002-01-2645.
- Kihlman, H. and Engstrom, M., "Flexapods - Flexible Tooling at SAAB for Building the NEURON Aircraft," SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-1871, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-1871.
- Jefferson, T., Crossley, R., Smith, T., and Ratchev, S., "Review of Reconfigurable Assembly Systems Technologies for Cost Effective Wing Structure Assembly," SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-2336, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-2336.
- Jefferson, T., Ratchev, S., and Crossley, R., "Axiomatic Design of a Reconfigurable Assembly System for Primary Wing Structures," SAE Int. J. Aerosp. 7(2):229-240, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-2249.
- Jefferson, T., Benardos, P., and Ratchev, S., "Reconfigurable Assembly System Design Methodology: A Wing Assembly Case Study," SAE Int. J. Mater. Manf. 9(1):31-48, 2016, doi:10.4271/2015-01-2594.
- Erdem I., Helgosson P., and Kihlman H., “Development of Automated Flexible Tooling as Enabler in Wing Box Assembly,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 44, pp. 233-238, 2016.
- Hempstead, B., Thayer, B., and Williams, S., "Composite Automatic Wing Drilling Equipment (CAWDE)," SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-3162, 2006, doi:10.4271/2006-01-3162.
- Devlieg, R., "Expanding the Use of Robotics in Airframe Assembly Via Accurate Robot Technology," SAE Int. J. Aerosp. 3(1):198-203, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-1846.
- Jeffries, K., "Enhanced Robotic Automated Fiber Placement with Accurate Robot Technology and Modular Fiber Placement Head," SAE Int. J. Aerosp. 6(2):774-779, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-2290.
- Haldimann, R. and Orf, D., "Utilization of a Vision System to Automate Mobile Machine Tools," SAE Int. J. Mater. Manf. 8(1):63-66, 2015, doi:10.4271/2014-01-2271.
- Gray, T., Orf, D., and Adams, G., "Mobile Automated Robotic Drilling, Inspection, and Fastening," SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-2338, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-2338.
- Adams, G., "Next Generation Mobile Robotic Drilling and Fastening Systems," SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-2259, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-2259.
- Cordeiro E. C., Barbosa G. F., and Trabasso L. G., “A customized QFD (quality function deployment) applied to management of automation projects,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., pp. 1-10, 2016.
- Bediér C., Vancauwenberghe M., and Sintern W. van, “The growing role of emerging markets in aerospace,” McKinsey Q., vol. 2, p. 114, 2008.
- Cliff R., Ohlandt C. J. R., and Yang D., Ready for takeoff: China’s advancing aerospace industry. Rand Corporation, 2011.
- Lozano A. and Eriksson S., “9 The commercial aircraft industry in Russia and Ukraine,” Glob. Commer. Aviat. Ind., p. 297, 2015.
- Agyapong-Kodua K., Brown R., Darlington R., and Ratchev S., “An integrated product-process design methodology for cost-effective product realisation,” Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 814-828, 2012.
- Agyapong-Kodua K., Darlington R., and Ratchev S., “Towards the derivation of an integrated design and manufacturing methodology,” Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 527-539, 2013.
- Markish J. and Willcox K., “A value-based approach for commercial aircraft conceptual design,” in Proceedings of the ICAS2002 Congress, Toronto, 2002.
- Butterfield J., McClean A., Yin Y., Curran R., Burke R., Welch B., and Devenny C., “An Integrated Lean Approach to Aerospace Assembly Jig and Work Cell Design Using Digital Manufacturing.,” in Collaborative Product and Service Life Cycle Management for a Sustainable World, Springer, 2008, pp. 531-540.
- Price M., Raghunathan S., and Curran R., “An integrated systems engineering approach to aircraft design,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 331-376, 2006.
- Andersson F., Hagqvist A., Sundin E., and Björkman M., “Design for Manufacturing of Composite Structures for Commercial Aircraft-The Development of a DFM Strategy at SAAB Aerostructures,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 17, pp. 362-367, 2014.
- Anselmetti B. and Fricero B., “Aid tool for the design of process and aircraft assembly lines,” Aerosp. Sci. Technol., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 387-398, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1270963811001507
- Martin O. C., Muelaner J. E., Wang Z., Kayani A., Tomlinson D., Maropoulos P. G., and Helgasson P., “Metrology enhanced tooling for aerospace (META): A live fixturing Wing Box assembly case study,” in 7th International Conference on Digital Enterprise Technology, 2011, pp. 83-92.
- Maropoulos P. G., Muelaner J. E., Summers M. D., and Martin O. C., “A new paradigm in large-scale assembly-research priorities in measurement assisted assembly,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 70, no. 1-4, pp. 621-633, 2014.
- Muelaner J. E. and Maropoulos P. G., “Design for measurement assisted determinate assembly (MADA) of large composite structures,” in Journal of the Coordinate Metrology Systems Conference, 2010.