This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Eddy-resolving Simulations of the Notchback ‘DrivAer’ Model: Influence of Underbody Geometry and Wheels Rotation on Aerodynamic Behaviour
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 05, 2016 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
The present work deals with a computational study of a ‘DrivAer’ car model, the rear-end shape of which corresponds to the Notchback configuration (Heft et al.  and Heft ). The study investigates the effects of the underbody geometry and wheel rotation on the aerodynamic performance. The configurations with detailed and smooth underbody as well as with stationary and rotating wheels are considered. The computational model applied relies on a VLES (Very Large Eddy Simulation) formulation, Chang et al. . The residual turbulence related to the VLES framework is presently modelled by a RANS-based (Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes), four-equation (D(k,ɛ,ζ, f)/Dt) near-wall eddy-viscosity model, Hanjalic et al. . In addition to the equations governing the kinetic energy of turbulence (kus) and its dissipation rate (ɛus), it solves a transport equation for the quantity , representing a key parameter, as it models the velocity scale in the expression for the corresponding turbulence viscosity. In addition to VLES, all considered flows are simulated within both RANS and Unsteady RANS (URANS) frameworks using the same background model formulation representing the constituent of the VLES method. Whereas the “k-ɛ-ζ-f” model describes fully-modelled turbulence within the RANS/URANS method, it relates to the unresolved sub-scale turbulence within the VLES framework (the relevant quantities are denoted by the subscript ‘us’). Unlike the RANS/URANS method, the VLES method is capable of capturing the spectral dynamics of turbulence to an extent complying with the underlying grid resolution. Accordingly, the superiority of the VLES method is especially visible at the computed evolution of the aerodynamic coefficients, agreeing reasonably well with the experimental database.
CitationJakirlic, S., Kutej, L., Hanssmann, D., Basara, B. et al., "Eddy-resolving Simulations of the Notchback ‘DrivAer’ Model: Influence of Underbody Geometry and Wheels Rotation on Aerodynamic Behaviour," SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-1602, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-1602.
- Heft, A., Indinger, T., and Adams, N., "Introduction of a New Realistic Generic Car Model for Aerodynamic Investigations," SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-0168, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-0168.
- Heft, A., 2014, “Aerodynamic Investigation of the Cooling Requirements of Electric Vehicles”, PhD Thesis, Technical University Munich, Verlag Dr. Hut, ISBN 978-3-8439-1765-0
- Chang, C.-Y., Jakirlic, S., Dietrich, K., Basara, B. and Tropea, C., 2014, “Swirling flow in a tube with variably-shaped outlet orifices: an LES and VLES study”, Int. J. of Heat and Fluid Flow, Vol. 49, pp. 28-42, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2014.05.008
- Hanjalic, K., Popovac, M. and Hadziabdic, M., 2004, “A robust near-wall elliptic-relaxation eddy-viscosity turbulence model for CFD”, Int. J. of Heat and Fluid Flow, Vol. 25., pp.1047-1051, doi:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2004.07.005
- Jakirlic, S. and Maduta, R., 2015, “Extending the bounds of “steady” RANS closures: toward an instability-sensitive Reynolds stress model”, Int. J. of Heat and Fluid Flow, Vol. 51,pp. 175-194, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2014.09.003
- Chang, C.-Y., Jakirlic, S., Basara, B. and Tropea C., 2014, “Flow dynamics in a realistic IC-engine simulated by a near-wall VLES model”, 10th Int. ERCOFTAC Symposium on Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Measurements (ETMM10), Marbella, Spain, September 17-19
- Chang, C.-Y., Jakirlic, S., Krumbein, B. and Tropea, C., 2015, “A novel VLES model for turbulent flow simulations”, 9th Int. Symp. on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena (TSFP9), Melbourne, Australia, June 30 - July 3
- Speziale, C.G., 1998, “Turbulence modeling for time-dependent RANS and VLES: a review”, AIAA Journal, Vol. 36(2), pp. 173-184, doi:10.2514/2.7499
- Basara, B., Krajnovic, S., Girimaji, S. and Pavlovic, Z., 2011, Near-Wall Formulation of the Partially Averaged Navier-Stokes Turbulence Model. AIAA Journal, Vol. 49(12), pp. 2627-2636, doi:10.2514/1.J050967
- Durbin, P.A., 1991, “Near-Wall Turbulence Closure Modelling Without Damping Functions”, Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dynamic., Vol. 3, pp. 1-13, doi:10.1007/BF00271513
- Basara, B., 2006, “An Eddy Viscosity Transport Model Based on Elliptic Relaxation Approach”, AIAA Journal, Vol. 44, pp. 1686-1690, doi:10.2514/1.20739
- Popovac, M., and Hanjalic, K., 2005, “Compound Wall Treatment for RANS Computation of Complex Turbulent Flows,” Proc. of the Third MIT Conference On Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics, Vol. 1, Elsevier, New York, Bathe K. (editor), pp. 802-806
- Popovac, M. and Hanjalic, K., 2007. “Compound Wall Treatment for RANS Computation of Complex Turbulent Flows and Heat Transfer”, Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, Vol. 78, pp. 177-202, doi: 10.1007/s10494-006-9067-x
- AVL-FIRE Programme Manual, AVL List GmbH, Graz, Austria. CFD Solver Version 2014
- Basara, B., 2004, “Employment of the second-moment turbulence closure on arbitrary unstructured grids”, Int. J. Numerical Methods in Fluids, Vol. 44, pp. 377-407, doi: 10.1002/fld.646
- Basara, B., Alajbegovic, A. and Beader, D., 2004, “Simulation of single- and two-phase flows on sliding unstructured meshes using finite volume method”, Int. J. Numerical Methods in Fluids, Vol. 45, pp. 1137-1159, doi: 10.1002/fld.733
- Frank, T., Gerlicher, B. and Abanto, J., 2013, „DrivAer -Aerodynamic Investigations for a New Realistic Generic Car Model using ANSYS CFD”, Automotive Simulation World Congress, October, 2013, Frankfurt, Germany
- Peichl, M., Mack, S. Indinger T., and Decker, F., 2014, “Numerical investigation of the flow around a generic car using dynamic mode decomposition,” Proc. of the ASME 2014 4th Joint US-European Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting - FEDSM 2014, August 3-7, 2014, Chicago, Illinois, USA, Paper No. FEDSM2014-21255
- Guilmineau, E., "Numerical Simulations of Flow around a Realistic Generic Car Model," SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars -Mech. Syst. 7(2):646-653, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-0607.
- Ashton, N. and Revell, A., "Comparison of RANS and DES Methods for the DrivAer Automotive Body," SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1538, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-1538.
- Heft, A., 2016, “Private communication”
- Wieser, D., Schmidt, H., Müller, S., Strangfeld, C. et al., "Experimental Comparison of the Aerodynamic Behavior of Fastback and Notchback DrivAer Models," SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 7(2):682-691, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-0613.
- Hucho, W.-F. (Ed.), 2008, “Aerodynamik des Automobils”, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ISBN 978-3-663-09218-6, doi: 10.1007/978-3-663-09217-9
- McManus, J. and Zhang, X., 2006, “A Computational Study of the Flow Around an Isolated Wheel in Contact With Ground,” Journal of Fluids Engineering, Vol. 128, No. 3, pp. 520-530, doi:10.1115/1.2175158
- Hetherington, B. and Sims-Williams, D., "Wind Tunnel Model Support Strut Interference," SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-0806, 2004, doi:10.4271/2004-01-0806.
- Tsubokura, M., Kerr, A., Onishi, K., and Hashizume, Y., "Vehicle Aerodynamics Simulation for the Next Generation on the K Computer: Part 1 Development of the Framework for Fully Unstructured Grids Using up to 10 Billion Numerical Elements," SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 7(3):1106-1118, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-0621.
- Onishi, K., Tsubokura, M., Obayashi, S., and Nakahashi, K., "Vehicle Aerodynamics Simulation for the Next Generation on the K Computer: Part 2 Use of Dirty CAD Data with Modified Cartesian Grid Approach," SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 7(2):528-537, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-0580.