This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Lightweighting of an Automotive Front End Structure Considering Frontal NCAP and Pedestrian Lower Leg Impact Safety Requirements
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 05, 2016 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
The present work is concerned with the objective of design optimization of an automotive front end structure meeting both occupant and pedestrian safety requirements. The main goal adopted here is minimizing the mass of the front end structure meeting the safety requirements without sacrificing the performance targets. The front end structure should be sufficiently stiff to protect the occupant by absorbing the impact energy generated during a high speed frontal collision and at the same time it should not induce unduly high impact loads during a low speed pedestrian collision. These two requirements are potentially in conflict with each other; however, there may exist an optimum design solution, in terms of mass of front end structure, that meets both the requirements. In the current optimization problem definition, the peak deceleration extracted from the NCAP (New Car Assessment Program) crash pulse and the deceleration generated on a pedestrian legform are considered as constraint parameters. Assuming the gages of bumper beam, front rails, and bumper fascia as well as foam strength as design variables, the mass of the front end structure (i.e. effectively the total mass of the parts mentioned) of a previously validated Dodge Neon finite element model is optimized. Using the response surface method (RSM) and the design of experiment (DOE) technique, second order polynomial response surfaces are generated for the constraint parameters. Using the response surface equations and the design constraints, an optimum solution is then obtained by using a sequential quadratic programming (SQP) algorithm in MATLAB. It is noted the optimal solution gave a 9 kg reduction in the mass of the front end structure along with meeting the constraints imposed by crashworthiness performance in full frontal impact against a rigid barrier as in a US-NCAP test and pedestrian impact safety requirement according to EEVC/WG17 standard.
|Technical Paper||Model Predictive Control for Human Motion Simulation|
|Aerospace Standard||Analytical Methods for Aircraft Seat Design and Evaluation|
|Technical Paper||Optimization Design of FoamIPillar for Head Impact Protection Using Design of Experiment Approach|
CitationSrinivas, G., Deb, A., and Chou, C., "Lightweighting of an Automotive Front End Structure Considering Frontal NCAP and Pedestrian Lower Leg Impact Safety Requirements," SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-1520, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-1520.
- Forsberg, J. and Nilsson, L., Evaluation of response surface methodologies used in crashworthiness optimization, International Journal of Impact Engineering, Volume 32, Issue 5, May 2006, pp. 759-777.
- Etman, L. F. P., Optimization of multibody systems using approximations concepts, Technical University Eindhoven, Eindhoven, 1997.
- Marklund P.-O., and Nilsson, L. Optimization of a car body component subjected to impact, Struct Multidisc Opt, 21 (2001), pp. 383-392.
- Giunta, A. A., Watson, L. T. and Koehler, J. A comparison of approximating modeling techniques: polynomial versus interpolating models, Proceedings of the 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis & optimization, St Louis, 1998. p. 392-404.
- Gu, L., A comparison of polynomial based regression models in vehicle safety analysis, Proceedings of ASME design engineering technical conferences, Pittsburgh, PA, September 2001.
- Jin, R., Chen, W. and Simpson, T. W. Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modeling criteria, Struct Multidisc Opt, 23 (2001).
- Simpson, T. W., Maurey, T. M., Korte, J. J. and Mistree, F., Comparison of response surface and kriging models for multidisciplinary design optimization, Proceedings of the 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis & Optimization, St Louis, 1998, pp. 381-391.
- Tanlak, N., Sonmez O., Senaltun F., M., Shape optimization of bumper beams under high-velocity impact loads, Engineering Structures 95 (2015) 49-60.
- Hosseinzadeh, R., Shokrieh, M.M., Lessard, L.B., Parametric study of automotive composite bumper beams subjected to low-velocity impacts, Composite Structures 68 (2005) 419-427.
- Zhang, Y., Zhu, P., Chen, G., Lightweight Design of Automotive Front Side Rail Based on Robust Optimisation, Thin-Walled Structures 45 (2007) 670-676.
- Janssen, E. G.,EEVC test methods to evaluate pedestrian protection afforded by passengers cars, Paper Number 96-S7-W-17, 15th ESV Conference. Melbourne, Australia, May 1996.
- Deb, A., Gunti, R., Chou, C., and Dutta, U., "Use of Truncated Finite Element Modeling for Efficient Design Optimization of an Automotive Front End Structure," SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-0496, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-0496.
- Abvabi, A., Nasr, A., Noorpoor, A., Kiasat, M.S., Investigation on the effect of impact location height on pedestrian safety using a legform impactor dynamic model, Safety Science 48 (2010) 660-671.
- Bouix, R., Viot, P., Lataillade, J., Polypropylene foam behaviour under dynamic loadings: Strain rate, density and microstructure effects, International Journal of Impact Engineering 36 (2009) 329-342.
- Deb A., Chou, C., “Vehicle front impact safety design using a hybrid methodology”, International Journal of Vehicle Safety, 2(1/2), (2007) 44-56.
- Mathews, P., Design of experiments with MINITAB, Pearson Education (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., Delhi, India.
- Tso-Liang T, Trong-Hai N., Development and validation of FE models of impactor for pedestrian testing., Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 22 (2008) 1660-1667.
- Mahadevan, K., Liang, P., and Fekete, J., "Effect of Strain Rate in Full Vehicle Frontal Crash Analysis," SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-0625, 2000, doi:10.4271/2000-01-0625.
- Deb, A., Naravane, A., An improved representation of vehicle incompatibility in frontal NCAP tests using a modified rigid barrier, International Journal of Crashworthiness, 11(1), (2006)13-25.