This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Observed Differences in Lane Departure Warning Responses during Single-Task and Dual-Task Driving: A Secondary Analysis of Field Driving Data
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 05, 2016 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) are an increasingly common feature of modern vehicles. The influence of such systems on driver behavior, particularly in regards to the effects of intermittent warning systems, is sparsely studied to date. This paper examines dynamic changes in physiological and operational behavior during lane departure warnings (LDW) in two commercial automotive systems utilizing on-road data. Alerts from the systems, one using auditory and the other haptic LDWs, were monitored during highway driving conditions. LDW events were monitored during periods of single-task driving and dual-task driving. Dual-task periods consisted of the driver interacting with the vehicle’s factory infotainment system or a smartphone to perform secondary visual-manual (e.g., radio tuning, contact dialing, etc.) or auditory-vocal (e.g. destination address entry, contact dialing, etc.) tasks. Driver physiology and behavior were recorded and analyzed during pre-LDW event and post-LDW event epochs. The percentage changes between pre-event and post-event measures were calculated to normalize for differences between vehicles. Changes in heart rate, skin conductance level, and steering wheel angle were observed after LDW events during single-task and dual-task driving periods. These metrics varied between single-task and dual-task driving, and between pre-event and post-event epochs. These results suggest a relationship between a driver’s demand level and the driver’s response to a lane departure warning signal.
CitationMcWilliams, T., Brown, D., Reimer, B., Mehler, B. et al., "Observed Differences in Lane Departure Warning Responses during Single-Task and Dual-Task Driving: A Secondary Analysis of Field Driving Data," SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-1425, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-1425.
- Scott, J.J. and Gray, R., “A Comparison of Tactile, Visual, and Auditory Warnings For Rear-End Collision Prevention in Simulated Driving,” Human Factors 50(2): 264-275, 2008.
- Suzuki, K. and Håkan, J., “An Analysis of Driver’s Steering Behaviour During Auditory or Haptic Warnings for the Designing of Lane Departure Warning System,” JSAE Review 24(1): 65-70, 2003.
- Brown, D., Reimer, B., Mehler, B., and Dobres, J., “An On-Road Study Involving Two Vehicles: Observed Differences Between an Auditory and Haptic Lane Departure Warning System,” Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Nottingham, UK, September 1-3, 2015. doi:10.1145/2809730.2809747
- Zhao, N., Reimer, B., Mehler, B., D’Ambrosio, L. A. et al., “Self-Reported and Observed Risky Driving Behaviors Among Frequent and Infrequent Cell Phone Users,” Accident Analysis & Prevention 61: 71-77, 2013.
- Maciej, J., and Vollrath, M., “Comparison of Manual vs. Speech-Based Interaction with In-Vehicle Information Systems,” Accident Analysis & Prevention 41(5): 924-930, 2009.
- Reimer, B., Mehler, B., Dobres, J., McAnulty, H. et al., “Effects of an ‘Expert Mode’ Voice Command System on Task Performance, Glance Behavior & Driver Physiology,” 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicle Applications (AutoUI 2014), Seattle, WA, 2014.
- Mehler, B., Kidd, D., Reimer, B., Reagan, I. et al., “Multi-Modal Assessment of On-Road Demand of Voice and Manual Phone Calling and Voice Navigation Entry across Two Embedded Vehicle Systems,” Ergonomics, 2015, doi:10.1080/00140139.2015.1081412
- Mehler, B., Reimer, B., McAnulty, H., Dobres, J. et al., Assessing the Demands of Voice Based In-Vehicle Interfaces -Phase II Experiment 2 - 2014 Mercedes CLA (2014t). MIT AgeLab Technical Report 2015-8, 2015. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
- NHTSA, Visual-Manual NHTSA Driver Distraction Guidelines for In-Vehicle Electronic Devices (Docket No. NHTSA-2010-0053). U.S. Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Washington, DC, 2013.
- Angell, L., Auflick, J., Austria, P. A., Kochhar, D. et al., Driver Workload Metrics Task 2 Final Report & Appendices (DOT HS 810 635) (pp. 1-460). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration / US Department of Transportation, 2006.
- Smith, D. L., Chang, J., Glassco, R., Foley, J., and Cohen, D., “Methodology for Capturing Driver Eye Glance Behavior During in-Vehicle Secondary Tasks,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1937(1): 61-65, 2005.
- R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2015, retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
- Soklov, E. N., “Perception and the Conditioned Reflex,” Oxford: Pergamon, 1963.
- Mehler, B., Reimer, B., Pohlmeyer, A.E., and Coughlin, J.F., “The Association Between Heart Rate Reactivity and Driving Performance Under Dual Task Demand in Late Middle Age Drivers”, Advances in Transportation Studies an International Journal. Special Issue, 53-70, 2008.