This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Potential Cost Savings of Combining Power and Energy Batteries in a BEV 300
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 05, 2016 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Present-day battery technologies support a battery electric vehicle with a 300mile range (BEV 300), but the cost of such a vehicle hinders its large-scale adoption by consumers. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has set aggressive cost targets for battery technologies. At present, no single technology meets the cost, energy, and power requirements of a BEV 300, but a combination of multiple batteries with different capabilities might be able to lower the overall cost closer to the DOE target. This study looks at how such a combination can be implemented in vehicle simulation models and compares the vehicle manufacturing and operating costs to a baseline BEV 300. Preliminary analysis shows an opportunity to modestly reduce BEV 300 energy storage system cost by about 8% using a battery pack that combines an energy and power battery. The baseline vehicle considered in the study uses a single battery sized to meet both the power and energy requirements of a BEV 300. The alternate option considered is a combination of two battery packs controlled by a power conditioner. The energy battery has lithium sulphur (Li-S) cells, and the power battery has lithium manganese oxide (LMOG) cells. The Li-S and LMOG cells have different cost characteristics. While it is relatively cheap to increase the capacity of an energy battery, adding more power to an energy battery is expensive. Similarly, more discharge power capability can be inexpensively added to the power battery, but storing more energy in that battery is expensive. However, it should be noted that this approach is not compatible with a high-rate, fast-charging requirement. This study looks at the levelized cost of driving (LCOD) for BEV 300s when different battery types and combinations are used.
|Technical Paper||Parameter Selection and Matching Design of Electric Transit Bus BJD6100-EV|
|Technical Paper||Evaluation of a Hybrid Energy Storage System for EV's|
|Technical Paper||SOC Estimation of Battery Pack Considering Cell Inconsistency|
CitationVijayagopal, R., Gallagher, K., Lee, D., and Rousseau, A., "Potential Cost Savings of Combining Power and Energy Batteries in a BEV 300," SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-1213, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-1213.
- Bohn , T. Active Combination of Ultracapacitors and Batteries for PHEV ESS Presentation at Department of Energy Annual Merit Review May 2009
- Burke , A. and Zhao , H. Simulations of Plug-in Hybrid Vehicles Using Advanced Lithium Batteries and Ultracapacitors on Various Driving Cycles University of California, Davis Institute of Transportation Studies Research Report, UCD-ITSRR-10-02 2010
- Omar , N. , Coosemans , Th. , Martin , J. , Sauvant-Moynot , V. et.al. SuperLib Project: Advanced Dual-Cell Battery Concept for Battery Electric Vehicles Presented at EVS26 International Battery, Hybrid and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Symposium Los Angeles, CA May 2012
- BatPaC: A Lithium-Ion Battery Performance and Cost Model for Electric-Drive Vehicles Argonne National Laboratory http://www.cse.anl.gov/batpac/
- Halbach , S. , Sharer , P. , Pagerit , S. , Rousseau , A. et al. Model Architecture, Methods, and Interfaces for Efficient Math-Based Design and Simulation of Automotive Control Systems SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-0241 2010 10.4271/2010-01-0241
- Moawad , A. and Rousseau , A. Light-duty vehicle fuel consumption displacement potential up to 2045 Argonne National Laboratory Technical Report ANL/ESD/11-4 April 2014
- Wild , S.M. Solving Derivative-Free Nonlinear Least Squares Problems with POUNDERS1 Argonne Technical Report ANL/MCS-P5120-0414 2014
- Vijayagopal , R. , Chen , R. , Sharer P. , Wild , S.M. et.al. Using multi-objective optimization for automotive component sizing Presented at EVS28 KINTEX Korea May 2015