Comparison of Supercharging Concepts for SI Engine Downsizing

2016-01-1032

04/05/2016

Event
SAE 2016 World Congress and Exhibition
Authors Abstract
Content
The paper reviews the design of the supercharging system for a strongly downsized engine, to be installed on a sport car. Design is supported by cfd-1d engine simulations, using an experimentally calibrated model.
The goal of the supercharging system is to deliver the required values of boost pressure at steady operating conditions, and to maintain or improve the full size engine response during acceleration (one of the most critical issues for downsized engines). Two options have been considered: 1) two-stage turbocharging, with two small turbochargers as a high-pressure stage, and one big turbo as low pressure stage (referred to as “TRITURBO”; 2) two-stage supercharging made up of one low pressure stage turbocharger and one electric supercharger (referred to as “E-SUPER”).
It was found that both configurations not only allow the downsized engine to comply with the performance targets at wide open throttle, steady conditions, but they are also able to improve the transient response in comparison to the full size engine. TRITURBO is less expensive than E-SUPER, but also less fuel efficient and more difficult to install on the vehicle.
Meta TagsDetails
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-1032
Pages
8
Citation
Mattarelli, E., Rinaldini, C., and Agostinelli, E., "Comparison of Supercharging Concepts for SI Engine Downsizing," SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-1032, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-1032.
Additional Details
Publisher
Published
Apr 5, 2016
Product Code
2016-01-1032
Content Type
Technical Paper
Language
English