This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Benchmarking and Hardware-in-the-Loop Operation of a 2014 MAZDA SkyActiv 2.0L 13:1 Compression Ratio Engine
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 05, 2016 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
As part of its technology assessment for the upcoming midterm evaluation (MTE) of the 2022-2025 Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas (LD GHG) emissions standards, EPA has been benchmarking engines and transmissions to generate inputs for use in its Advanced Light-Duty Powertrain and Hybrid Analysis (ALPHA) model, a physics-based, forward-looking, full vehicle computer simulation tool. One of the most efficient engines today, a 2.0L Mazda SkyActiv engine, is of particular interest due to its high geometric compression ratio and use of an Atkinson cycle. EPA benchmarked the 2.0L SkyActiv at its National Vehicle and Fuel Emissions laboratory.
EPA then incorporated ALPHA into an engine dynamometer control system so that vehicle chassis testing could be simulated with a hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) approach. In order to model the behavior of current and future vehicles, an algorithm was developed to dynamically generate transmission shift logic from a set of user-defined parameters, a cost function (e.g., engine fuel consumption) and vehicle performance during simulation.
This paper first presents the results of EPA’s benchmarking of a Mazda 2.0L 13:1 CR SkyActiv engine. It then details the implementation of the SkyActiv 2.0L engine in an HIL test bed to represent chassis testing of an advanced vehicle configuration, which includes assumptions for a future high-efficiency transmission and reduced vehicle road loads. The engine was operated over simulated EPA city and highway test cycles to assess the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions performance in the context of EPA’s LD GHG standards through year 2025.
CitationEllies, B., Schenk, C., and Dekraker, P., "Benchmarking and Hardware-in-the-Loop Operation of a 2014 MAZDA SkyActiv 2.0L 13:1 Compression Ratio Engine," SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-1007, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-1007.
- US EPA, DOT/NHTSA, “2017 and Later Model Year Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards” http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-10-15/pdf/2012-21972.pdf, Oct. 2012
- Luria, D., Taitel, Y., and Stotter, A., "The Otto-Atkinson Engine - A New Concept in Automotive Economy," SAE Technical Paper 820352, 1982, doi:10.4271/820352.
- Wan, Y. and Du, A., “Reducing Part Load Pumping Loss and Improving Thermal Efficiency through High Compression Ratio Over-Expanded Cycle,” SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-1744, 2013, doi: 10.4271/2013-01-1744.
- Wan, Y. and Du, A., "Reducing Part Load Pumping Loss and Improving Thermal Efficiency through High Compression Ratio Over-Expanded Cycle," SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-1744, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-1744.
- Kawamoto, N., Naiki, K., Kawai, T., Shikida, T. et al., "Development of New 1.8-Liter Engine for Hybrid Vehicles," SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-1061, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-1061.
- Mazda Motor Corporation, “MAZDA’S INNOVATIVE SKYACTIV TECHNOLOGIES MAKE U.S. DEBUT”, April 21, 2011, http://www.mazdausamedia.com/index.php?s=31676&item=967#assets_67:125272, accessed Sep 2015.
- Stuhldreher, M., Schenk, C., Brakora, J., Hawkins, D. et al., "Downsized Boosted Engine Benchmarking and Results," SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1266, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-1266.
- US EPA, DOT/NHTSA, “Joint Technical Support Document: Final Rulemaking to Establish Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards” www.epa.gov/otaq/climate/regulations/420r10901.pdf, Aug. 2012
- Lee, B., Lee, S., Cherry, J., Neam, A. et al., "Development of Advanced Light-Duty Powertrain and Hybrid Analysis Tool," SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-0808, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-0808.
- Newman, K., Kargul, J., and Barba, D., "Development and Testing of an Automatic Transmission Shift Schedule Algorithm for Vehicle Simulation," SAE Int. J. Engines 8(3):1417-1427, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-1142.
- Kargul, J., Moskalik, A., Barba, D., Dekraker, P., et al., “Estimating GHG Reduction from Combinations of Current Best-Available and Future Powertrain and Vehicle Technologies for a Midsized Car Using EPA’s ALPHA Model,” SAE Technical Paper 16PFL-0745, 2015.
- US EPA, Test Car List Data, http://www3.epa.gov/otaq/tcldata.htm, accessed October, 2015.
- US EPA, “Regulatory Impact Analysis: Final Rulemaking to Establish Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards” (Table 3.5-25) http://www3.epa.gov/otaq/climate/documents/420r12016.pdf, Aug. 2012
- Greiner, J., Grumbach, M., Dick, A., and Sasse, C., "Advancement in NVH- and Fuel-Saving Transmission and Driveline Technologies," SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1087, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-1087.