This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Octane Requirement of a Turbocharged Spark Ignition Engine in Various Driving Cycles
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 05, 2016 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
High octane fuel (e.g., E85) effectively suppresses knock, but the octane ratings of such fuels are much above what is required under normal driving conditions. It is important, therefore, to understand the octane requirement of the engine itself over its full range of operation and apply that knowledge to practical driving cycles to understand fuel octane utilization, especially of a turbocharged engine. By carefully defining knock limits, the octane requirement of a 2-liter turbocharged spark ignition engine was experimentally quantified over a wide range of loads and speeds using PRF blends and gasoline-ethanol blends. Utilizing this knowledge and engine-in-vehicle simulations, the octane requirements of various driving cycles were calculated for a passenger car and a medium duty truck model. The effects of spark retard, engine downsizing at fixed vehicle performance, and vehicle types, on engine efficiency, fuel economy, and ethanol consumption were analyzed through parametric study. The average octane ratings of fuel needed in real-world driving were in the 60-80 RON range (the maximum RON required was 90-100.) Downsizing and vehicle loading in trucks increased octane requirement substantially. Matching the fuel supplied to the engine’s octane requirement by varying the amount of ethanol using a dual fuel system resulted in a significant increase in the average engine brake efficiency (about 30% increase) and fuel economy (about 26%) depending on driving details. Accordingly, ethanol consumption increased, but up to 5 CAD spark retard reduced the ethanol consumption considerably while not compromising efficiency.
CitationJo, Y., Bromberg, L., and Heywood, J., "Octane Requirement of a Turbocharged Spark Ignition Engine in Various Driving Cycles," SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-0831, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-0831.
- U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Monthly Energy Review (January 2014),” U.S. Energy Information Administration Monthly Energy Review, Tables 1.3, 2.1-2.6, Jan. 2014.
- PIRA Energy Group, “An Assessment of the Diesel Fuel Market: Demand, Supply, Trade, and Key Drivers,” http://fuelsinstitute.org/ResearchArticles/DieselReport_PIRA.pdf, Sep. 2014.
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Light-Duty Automotive Technology, Carbon Dioxide Emissions, and Fuel Economy Trends: 1975 through 2014,” Oct. 2014, doi:EPA-420-R-14-023a
- Heywood, J.B., "Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals," McGraw-Hill, 1988
- Smith, P., Heywood, J., and Cheng, W., "Effects of Compression Ratio on Spark-Ignited Engine Efficiency," SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-2599, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-2599.
- Han, D., Han, S., Han, B., and Kim, W., "Development of 2.0L Turbocharged DISI Engine for Downsizing Application," SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0259, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-0259.
- Smith, P. and Cheng, W., "Assessing the Loss Mechanisms Associated with Engine Downsizing, Boosting and Compression Ratio Change," SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-0929, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-0929.
- Jo, Y., Lewis, R., Bromberg, L., and Heywood, J., "Performance Maps of Turbocharged SI Engines with Gasoline-Ethanol Blends: Torque, Efficiency, Compression Ratio, Knock Limits, and Octane," SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-1206, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-1206.
- Wardsauto group, “a division of penton media Inc.; World Engines 2013,” http://wardsauto.com/site-files/wardsauto.com/files/datasheets/gated/worlden01_2013_0.xls, accessed Oct. 2015.
- Leone, T., Anderson, J., Davis, R., Iqbal, A. et al., “The Effect of Compression Ratio, Fuel Octane Rating, and Ethanol Content on Spark-Ignition Engine Efficiency,” Environmental Science and Technology 49(18):10778-10789, 2015, doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b01420.
- Ayala, F., Gerty, M., and Heywood, J., "Effects of Combustion Phasing, Relative Air-fuel Ratio, Compression Ratio, and Load on SI Engine Efficiency," SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-0229, 2006, doi:10.4271/2006-01-0229.
- ANFAVEA, “Brazilian Automotive Industry Yearbook,” Brazilian Automotive Industry, 2013.
- Stein, R., House, C., and Leone, T., "Optimal Use of E85 in a Turbocharged Direct Injection Engine," SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 2(1):670-682, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-1490.
- Sims, R., Schaeffer, R., Creutzig, F., Cruz-Núñez X. et al., "2014: Transport. In: Climate Change2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the IntergovernmentalPanel on Climate Change," Cambridge University Press, 2014
- Korves, R., “The Potential Role for Corn Ethanol in Meeting the Energy Needs of the United States in 2016-2030,” Global Bioenergy Partnership, Oct. 2008.
- Humm, R., Goldsmith, P., Rausch, K., Stein, H., “Land Usage attributed to corn ethanol production in the United States: sensitivity to technological advances in corn grain yield, ethanol conversion, and co-product utilization,” Biotechnology for Biofuels 7(61): 10.1186/1754-6834-7-61.
- Kasseris, E. and Heywood, J., "Charge Cooling Effects on Knock Limits in SI DI Engines Using Gasoline/Ethanol Blends: Part 1-Quantifying Charge Cooling," SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-1275, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-1275.
- Kasseris, E. and Heywood, J., "Charge Cooling Effects on Knock Limits in SI DI Engines Using Gasoline/Ethanol Blends: Part 2-Effective Octane Numbers," SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 5(2):844-854, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-1284.
- Renewable Fuels Association, “Pocket Guide to Ethanol,” 2013, http://ethanolrfa.org/page/-/PDFs/2013%20Pocket%20Guide.pdf?nocdn=1, Accessed Sep. 2015.
- Partridge, R., Weissman, W., Ueda, T., Iwashita, Y. et al., "Onboard Gasoline Separation for Improved Vehicle Efficiency," SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 7(2):366-378, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-1200.
- Kuzuoka, K., Kurotani, T., Chishima, H., and Kudo, H., "Study of High-Compression-Ratio Engine Combined with an Ethanol-Gasoline Fuel Separation System," SAE Int. J. Engines 7(4):1773-1780, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-2614.
- Chang, J., Viollet, Y., Alzubail, A., Abdul-Manan, A. et al., "Octane-on-Demand as an Enabler for Highly Efficient Spark Ignition Engines and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Improvement," SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1264, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-1264.engine spec reference (in terms of fuel)
- GM, “Pontiac Debuts 2007 Solstice GXP at LA Auto Show,” http://archives.media.gm.com/us/gm/en/news/events/autoshows/06la/brands/pontiac/index.html, Jan. 2006.
- Anderson, J., Leone, T., Shelby, M., Wallington, T. et al., "Octane Numbers of Ethanol-Gasoline Blends: Measurements and Novel Estimation Method from Molar Composition," SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-1274, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-1274.
- Stein, R., Polovina, D., Roth, K., Foster, M. et al., "Effect of Heat of Vaporization, Chemical Octane, and Sensitivity on Knock Limit for Ethanol - Gasoline Blends," SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 5(2):823-843, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-1277.
- Office of Transportation and Air Quality, “EPA Issues New Test Methods for Fuel Economy Window Stickers”, Dec. 2006, doi:EPA420-F-06-069
- Office of Transportation and Air Quality, “Final Technical Support Document Fuel Economy Labeling of Motor Vehicle Revisions to Improve Calculation of Fuel Economy Estimates”, Dec. 2006, doi:EPA420-R-06-017
- Douaud, A. and Eyzat, P., "Four-Octane-Number Method for Predicting the Anti-Knock Behavior of Fuels and Engines," SAE Technical Paper 780080, 1978, doi:10.4271/780080.
- Wall Street Journal, “Auto Sales,” http://online.wsj.com/mdc/public/page/2_3022-autosales.html, accessed Sep, 2015
- Toyota Camry, “2014 Camry Features & Specs,” http://www.toyota.com/camry/features/mechanical/2532/2540/2546/2548, accessed May 2014
- Ford, “2014 Chassis Cab Specifications,” http://www.ford.com/commercial-trucks/chassis-cab/specifications/, accessed May 2014
- Office of the Federal Register National Archives and Records Administration, “Protection of Enviroment: Containing a Codification of Documents of General Applicability and Future Effects,” Code of Federal Regulations, 40 C.F.R. 86.129-80, Jul. 2008