This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
3D Simulation Models Simplified to 2D Planar/Axisymmetric Problems in Automotive Structures
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 05, 2016 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
In automotive FEA analysis, there are many components or assemblies which can be simplified to two-dimensional (2D) plane or axisymmetric analytical problems instead of three-dimensional (3D) simulation models for quick modeling and efficient analysis to meet the timing in the design development process, especially in the advanced design phase and iteration studies. Even though some situations are not perfectly planar or axisymmetric problems, they may still be approximated in 2D planar or axisymmetric models, achieving results accurate enough to meet engineering requirements. In this paper, the authors have presented and summarized several complex 3D analytical situations which can be replaced by simplified plane axisymmetric models or 2D plane strain analytical models. Several numerical case studies presented in this paper demonstrate that plane axisymmetric and 2D planar models can provide efficient, reliable, and accurate analytical results as compared to the analytical results of equivalent 3D models. These case studies are intended to be used as reference for auto industry and CAE/FEA peers.
CitationQin, W., Datta, S., and Zhang, W., "3D Simulation Models Simplified to 2D Planar/Axisymmetric Problems in Automotive Structures," SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-0397, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-0397.
- Krueger Ronald, Paris Isabelle L., etc. “Comparison of 2D Finite Element Modeling Assumptions with Results from 3D Analysis for Composite Skin-Stiffener Debonding”. Composite Structures. Volume 57, July-September 2002.
- Poiatea Isis A.V.P., Vasconcellosa Adalberto B., etc. “2D and 3D finite element analysis of central incisor generated by computerized tomography”, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine 104(2011) 292-299.
- Zeleniakiene D., Griskevicius P., Leisis V., “The comparative analysis of 2D and 3D microstructural models stresses of porous polymer materials”, ISSN 1392 - 1207. MECHANIKA. 2005. Nr.3(53), 2004.
- Davis Erika A., “A Study of a Combined 2D Axisymmetric and 3D Cyclically Symmetric Finite Element Model of a Turbine Disk”, A thesis of Master, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Hartford, Connecticut, May, 2008
- Serkan Ucer, “Comparison of 2D and 3D finite element models of tunnel advance in soft ground: A case study on Bolu Tunnels”, A thesis of Middle East Technical University, 2006.
- Abaqus Analysis User’s manual, Version 6.6, SIMULIA, 2006.
- MSC MarcMentat User’s manual, MSC software Inc., 2004
- Ansys user’s manual, Theory Reference Release 5.6, ANSYS Inc. 1994.