This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Aerodynamic Shape Improvement for Driver Side View Mirror of Hatchback Vehicle using Adjoint Optimization Method
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published September 22, 2015 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Nowadays, one of the most important roles in vehicle development is the aerodynamic, which aims efficiency on fuel consumption and leads to a green technology. Several initiatives around the world are regulating emissions and efficiency of vehicles such as EURO for European Marketing and the INOVAR Project to be implemented in Brazil on 2017.
Thus, this study intend to perform an optimization to minimize the drag force of a hatchback vehicle. The main goal of this work is demonstrate the potential of optimization techniques to provide an aerodynamic shape improvement for the driver side outside rear view mirror of a hatchback vehicle. The optimization solver used in this work is the Adjoint Solver, which makes shape sensitivity analysis and mesh/volume morphing.
The study was conducted using CFD simulations to reduce the drag force of current production hatchback vehicle previously validated and correlated in wind tunnel test. Firstly, the optimization solver is used to improve the surface of the view mirror to decrease its drag force. Results show drag coefficient decrease in 0.008 for the optimized surface of the view mirror. This work demonstrated the potential of optimization technique, which can be applied in early stages of projects and extended to optimize several surfaces of body vehicle.
CitationMagazoni, F., Buscariolo, F., Maruyama, F., Alves, J. et al., "Aerodynamic Shape Improvement for Driver Side View Mirror of Hatchback Vehicle using Adjoint Optimization Method," SAE Technical Paper 2015-36-0156, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-36-0156.
- BATCHELDER, J. H., A CFD Investigation of Potential Aerodynamic Enhancements to a Microcar Class Vehicle. Master, Faculty of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 2009.
- BUSCARIOLO, F. F.; KARBON, K. J., Comparative CFD Analysis Between Rotating and Static Cases of Different Wheels Opening Designs over a Performance Sedan, SAE Technical Paper, 2011.
- CARPENTIERI, G., An Adjoint-Based Shape-Optimization Method for Aerodynamic Design, Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Universiteit Delft, 2009.
- CARPENTIERI, G.; KOREN, B.; VAN TOOREN, M. J. L., Adjoint-based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization on Unstructured Meshes, Journal of Computational Physics, 224, 267-287, 2007.
- ELLIOTT J., Aerodynamic optimization based on the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations using unstructured grids. Ph.D. Thesis, MIT, Department of Aeronautics and Astronomy, 1998.
- European Environment Agency, Monitoring CO2 emissions from passenger cars and vans in 2013, EEA Technical report No 19/2014, 2014.
- GILES, M. B.; PIERCE N. A., An Introduction to the Adjoint Approach to Design, Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 65, 393-415, 2000.
- Han, T., Hill, C. and Jindal, S., "Adjoint Method for Aerodynamic Shape Improvement in Comparison with Surface Pressure Gradient Method," SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 4(1):100-107, 2011, doi:10.4271/2011-01-0151.
- HAN, T.; KAUSHIK, S.; GIN, R.; BOT, E., Adjoint Method for Aerodynamic Shape Improvement, SAE Technical Paper, 2012.
- HUCHO, W. H., Aerodynamics of Road Vehicles, From Fluid Mechanics of Vehicle Engineering, 4th Edition, SAE International, 1998.
- KELLY, K. B.; PROVENCHER, L. G.; SCHENKEL, F. K., The General Motors Engineering Staff Aerodynamics Laboratory - A full Scale Automotive Wind Tunnel, SAE Paper, N° 820371, Society of Automotive Engineers, 1982.
- NIELSEN, E. J.; ANDERSON, W. K., Aerodynamic Design Optimization on Unstructured Meshes Using the Navier-Stokes Equations, AIAA Paper 98-4809, 1998.
- ZAYA, J., Aerodynamic Optimization of Ground Vehicles with the Use of Fluent’s Adjoint Solver, Master’s Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, 2013.