This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Effect of Thickness Ratio on Fatigue and FEA Life Estimation Criteria in Welded Structures
Published November 17, 2015 by Society of Automotive Engineers of Japan in Japan
Annotation ability available
The welded structures have a broad applicability in automotive industry. The welding being an assembled process, presents both advantages and disadvantages for the two wheeler motor structure. A simple existing defect after welding can generate a catastrophic fracture. Recently all major fabricated structures in two wheelers are optimized by Computer Aided Engineering - Finite Element Analysis techniques to meet the constricted weight to strength and stiffness targets. Local reinforcements in the main structure with unequal member thickness are playing major role to meet these requirements. Various critical parameters which affect the weld structure life are not being modeled in FE analysis to minimize the modeling complexity and computation times. But in FEA-simulations acceptance stress values for a given base material are derived as a function of various parameters like the geometry, size, thickness, weld location, weld toe, flank angle, welding quality and cold working process etc. In this paper the effect of the base material thickness and weld location on fatigue life of welded structure and FEA simulation acceptance limit values are investigated for two wheeler scooter frame. In order to predict the fatigue behavior of the welded structure, a constant amplitude loading is applied where the influence of the thickness ratio over the fatigue life and acceptance values for same base material are presented.
|Technical Paper||Computational Fatigue Life Prediction of Welded and Non-welded Ground Vehicle Components|
|Technical Paper||The Application of a Knowledge Based CAD System to Press Tool Design|
|Technical Paper||Reinforced Plastic Brake Booster|
CitationDaggupati, G., Karedla, D., Risam, G., and Kuppan, N., "Effect of Thickness Ratio on Fatigue and FEA Life Estimation Criteria in Welded Structures," SAE Technical Paper 2015-32-0717, 2015.
- Maddox S. J., “Fatigue Strength of Welded Structures,” Cambridge University Press, Abington, 1991.
- Frank K. H., Journal of Structural Division, Vol. 105, 1979, pp. 1727-1739.
- NIRM, “Fatigue Data Sheet, No. 18: Data Sheets on Fatigue Properties for Load-Carrying Cruciform Welded Joints of SM50B Rolled Steel for Welded Structure,” National Research Institute for Metals, 1980.
- Kainuma S. and Mori T., “A Study on Fatigue Crack Initiation Point of Load-Carrying Fillet Welded Cruciform Joints,” International Journal of Fatigue, Vol. 30, No. 9, 2008, pp. 1669-1677.
- Kannan K. and Hirth J. P., “Mixed Mode Fracture Tough-ness and Low Cycle Fatigue Behavior in an HSLA-80 Steel,” Scripta Materialia, Vol. 39, No. 6, 1998, pp. 743-748.
- Chan K. S., “Scaling Laws for Fatigue Crack,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, Vol. 24, No. 11, 1993, pp. 2473-2486.
- Nguyen T. N. and Wahab M. A., “A Theoretical Study of the Effect of Weld Geometry Parameters on Fatigue Crack Propagation Life,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 51, No. 1, 1995, pp. 1-18.
- Nguyen T. N. and Wahab M. A., “The Effect of Weld Geometry and Residual Stresses on the Fatigue of Welded Joints under Combined Loading,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 77, No. 1-3, 1998, pp. 201-208.
- Ferreira J. A. M. and Branco C. M., “Influence of Weld and Plate Geometry on the Fatigue Strength of Cruciform Joints,” Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 9, No. 1, 1988, pp. 23-32.