This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Comparative Analysis on Engine Performance of a Conventional Diesel Fuel and 10% Biodiesel Blends Produced from Coconut Oils
- Changhwan Woo - The University of New South Wales ,
- Sanghoon Kook - The University of New South Wales ,
- Peter Rogers - The University of New South Wales ,
- Christopher Marquis - The University of New South Wales ,
- Evatt Hawkes - The University of New South Wales ,
- Samani Tupufia - Scientific Research Organization of Samo
ISSN: 1946-3952, e-ISSN: 1946-3960
Published September 06, 2015 by SAE International in United States
Citation: Woo, C., Kook, S., Rogers, P., Marquis, C. et al., "A Comparative Analysis on Engine Performance of a Conventional Diesel Fuel and 10% Biodiesel Blends Produced from Coconut Oils," SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 8(3):597-609, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-24-2489.
This paper presents engine performance and emissions of coconut oil-derived 10% biodiesel blends in petroleum diesel demonstrating simultaneous reduction of smoke and NOx emissions and increased brake power. The experiments were performed in a single-cylinder version of a light-duty diesel engine for three different fuels including a conventional diesel fuel and two B10 fuels of chemical-catalyst-based methyl-ester biodiesel (B10mc) and biological-catalyst-based ethyl-ester biodiesel (B10eb). The engine tests were conducted at fixed speed of 2000 rpm and injection pressure of 130 MPa. In addition to the fuel variation, the injection timing and rate of exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) were also varied because they impact the combustion and thus the efficiency and emissions significantly. For each operating condition, the in-cylinder pressure traces were recorded using a piezo-electric pressure transducer, which was used to calculate the indicated mean effective pressure (IMEP), apparent heat release rate (aHRR), burn duration. The brake MEP (BMEP) was calculated from a brake torque reading in the EC dynamometer, which was then used to obtain friction MEP (FMEP) as the difference between IMEP and BMEP. The results show lower IMEP for B10mc and B10eb than that of petroleum diesel, which is expected considering the lower calorific value of B10 fuels. However, the BMEP of B10mc displays a comparable value to that of petroleum diesel. The reason for this unexpected observation is likely enhanced lubrication and thus reduced frictional loss because the addition of coconut-derived biodiesel compensates for the reduced IMEP. This effect is higher when B10eb is used, showing even higher BMEP than the petroleum diesel fuel, particularly at the earliest and latest injection timings. The advantages of B10eb over B10mc as well as petroleum diesel are also evident in the engine-out emissions. The emission results show that the smoke emissions are significantly lower for B10eb than those of B10mc or the petroleum diesel. The NOx emissions of B10eb are also lowest among the tested fuels. This finding is significant because B10mc show higher NOx emissions than the diesel fuel and B10eb. Another interesting finding from the experiments was the fact that EGR can be more effective in achieving further NOx reduction when B10eb was used than the petroleum diesel. For tested conditions of this study, the EGR tests demonstrate that B10eb achieves 10% opacity and 4 g/kWh NOx emission, which are lower than 20% opacity and 5.5 g/kWh NOx emission of the petroleum diesel. Therefore, B10eb in this study not only demonstrate a benefit in increasing the brake power of a conventional diesel fuel but also in simultaneously reducing smoke and NOx emissions.