Try Mobilus Beta
Search tips
 This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.

Response Times for Visual, Auditory and Vibrotactile Directional Cues in Driver Assistance Systems

Journal Article
2015-01-9153
ISSN: 2327-5626, e-ISSN: 2327-5634
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-9153
Published April 05, 2016 by SAE International in United States
Response Times for Visual, Auditory and Vibrotactile Directional Cues in Driver Assistance Systems
Sector:
Citation: Lundkvist, A. and Nykänen, A., "Response Times for Visual, Auditory and Vibrotactile Directional Cues in Driver Assistance Systems," SAE Int. J. Trans. Safety 4(1):8-14, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-9153.
Language: English

References

  1. Green D. M. and von Gierke S. M. Visual and Auditory Choice Reaction Times Acta Psychologica 55 231 247 1984
  2. Patten C. J. D. , Kircher A. , Östlund J. , Nilsson L. et al. Driver Experience and Cognitive Workload in Different Traffic Environments Accident Analysis and Prevention 38 887 894 2006
  3. Ho C. and Spence C. Using Peripersonal Warning Signals to Orient a Driver's Gaze Human Factors 51 539 556 August 2009
  4. Klauer S. G. , Dingus T. A. , Neale V. L. , Sudweeks J. D. et al. The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-Crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data Tech. Report National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Springfield, Virginia April 2006
  5. Blanco M. , Biever W. J. , Gallagher J. P. , and Dingus T. A. The Impact of Secondary Task Cognitive Processing Demand on Driving Performance Accident Analysis and Prevention 38 895 906 2006
  6. Ho C. and Spence C. Assessing the Effectiveness of Various Auditory Cues in Capturing a Driver's Visual Attention Journal of Experimental Psychology 11 3 157 174 2005
  7. Ho C. , Tan H. Z. , and Spence C. The Differential Effect of Vibrotactile and Auditory Cues on Visual Spatial Attention Ergonomics 49 7 724 738 2006
  8. Lee Y.-L. The Effect of Congruency Between Sound-Source Location and Verbal Message Semantics of In-Vehicle Navigation Systems Safety Science 48 708 713 2010
  9. Cao Y. , Mahr A. , Castronovo S. , Theune M. et al. Local Danger Warnings for Drivers: The Effect of Modality and Level of Assistance on Driver Reaction 14 th ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces 239 248 2010
  10. Sodnik J. , Dicke C. , Tomazic S. , and Billinghurst M. A User Study of Auditory Versus Visual Interfaces for Use While Driving International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 66 318 332 2008
  11. Sodnik J. , Tomazic S. , Dicke C. , and Billinghurst M. Spatial Auditory Interface for an Embedded Communication Device in a Car International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interaction 1 69 76 2008
  12. Ngo M. and Spence C. Crossmodal Facilitation of Masked Visual Target Identification Attention, Perception & Psychophysics 72 7 1938 1947 2010
  13. Shams L. and Kim R. Crossmodal Influences on Visual Perception Physics of Life Reviews 7 3 269 284 2010
  14. Ernst M. O. and Bülthoff H. H. Merging the Senses into a Robust Percept Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 162 169 2004
  15. ISO 26022 2010 Road Vehicles - Ergonomic Aspects of Transport Information and Control Systems - Simulated Lane Change Test to Assess In-vehicle Secondary Task Demand 2010
  16. Miller S. Literature Review: Workload Measures National Advanced Driving Simulator Iowa 2001
  17. Mattes S. The Lane-Change-Task as a Tool for Driver Distraction Evaluation Quality of Work and Products in Enterprises of the Future 57 60 2003
  18. Chengalur S. , Rogers S. , and Bernard T. KODAK's Ergonomic Design for People at Work New Yersey John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2 nd 2004
  19. Sanders M. S. and McCormick E. J. Human Factors in Engineering and Design McGraw-Hill Science/Engineering/Math 7 th 1993
  20. Sindhusake D. , Mitchell P. , Smith W. , Golding M. et al. Validation of self-reported hearing loss. The Blue Mountains Hearing Study International Journal of Epidemiology 30 1371 1378 2001
  21. Gomez M. I. , Hwang S. , Sobotova L. , Stark A. D. et al. A Comparison of Self-Reported Hearing Loss and Audiometry in a Cohort of New York Farmers Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 44 1201 1208 2001
  22. Spence C. Crossmodal Spatial Attention New York Academy of Sciences 1191 182 200 2010

Cited By

Recommended Content

Technical Paper Study on Driver's Car Following Abilities Based on an Active Haptic Support Function
Technical Paper Naturalistic Driving Behavior Analysis under Typical Normal Cut-In Scenarios
Technical Paper Technical Leadership Challenges for Highly Automated Driving: Technology Leadership Brief