This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Development of a Low Pressure Direct Injection System for a Small 2S Engine. Part II - Experimental Analysis of the Engine Performance and Pollutant Emissions
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 14, 2015 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
High specific fuel consumption and pollutant emissions are the main drawbacks of the small crankcase-scavenged two-stroke engine. The symmetrical port timing combined with a carburetor or an indirect injection system leads to a lower scavenging efficiency than a four-stroke engine and to the short-circuit of fresh air-fuel mixture. The use of fuel supply systems as the indirect injection and the carburetor is the standard solution for small two-stroke engine equipment, due to the necessity of reducing the complexity, weight, overall dimensions and costs.
This paper presents the results of a detailed study on the application of an innovative Low Pressure Direct Injection system (LPDI) on an existing 300 cm3 cylinder formerly equipped with a carburetor. The proposed solution is characterized by two injectors working at 5 bar of injection pressure. The injection nozzles are located in the liner wall at the opposite side of the exhaust port, with the axes oriented towards the piston at the BDC (Bottom Dead Center). The injectors are positioned above all of the cylinder ports in order to have an injection timing independent from the ports timing. The only constraint to the injection timing is related to the piston motion, with great benefits in terms of short-circuit reduction in all of the engine operating conditions.
Numerical and experimental activity was carried out in order to identify the best injector configuration and to assess the system performance. The results of the experimental study are reported here. Standard low cost components from the automotive market were used, without a significant increase of weight. The benefits of the innovative two-stroke LPDI engine were evaluated at the test bench and compared with the performance of the configurations equipped with the carburetor and the indirect injection system.
Once the position of the injectors inside the cylinder was defined, the development of the system at the test bench was focused primarily on the definition of the best injection timing, also taking advantage of the numerical results of the CFD analysis.
The experimental setup and the fine-tuning methodology are discussed in detail. The goal was to reach the best thermodynamic efficiency and the lowest pollutant emissions of the LPDI system while ensuring the same engine power with respect to the other two configurations, without increasing the manufacturing costs.
CitationRomani, L., Vichi, G., Ferrara, G., Balduzzi, F. et al., "Development of a Low Pressure Direct Injection System for a Small 2S Engine. Part II - Experimental Analysis of the Engine Performance and Pollutant Emissions," SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1730, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-1730.
- Balduzzi , F. , Vichi , G. , Romani , L. , Ferrara , G. et al Development of a Low Pressure Direct Injection system for a small 2S engine. Part I - CFD analysis of the injection process SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1727 2015
- Ragg , P., W. , McKay , M., L. , and Brooks , R., S. Direct fuel injection by compressed gas Orbital Engine Company Patent US4759335A 1986
- Charmely , W. , Ryan , C. Exhaust emissions testing of Orbital 50 cm 3 direct injection two-stroke engine EPA, Environmental Protection Agency 1996
- Nesti , P. Two-stroke cycle internal combustion engine using pneumatically assisted direct fuel injection Piaggio & C. S.p.A. 2002
- Ambler , M. and Zocchi , A. Development of the Aprilia DITECH 50 engine SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-1781 2001 10.4271/2001-01-1781
- Duret , P. , Lavy , J. , Venturi , S. , and Allen , C. SCIP Simplified Direct Injection for Low Emissions Small Two-Stroke Engines SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-3289 1999 10.4271/1999-01-3289
- VENTURI , S. , LAVY , J. , DURET , P. , SELVA , M. et al. From Development to Industrialization of an IAPAC® Marine Outboard D.I. 2-Stroke Engine SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-1780 2001 10.4271/2001-01-1780
- Nino , E. Two cycle internal combustion engine with direct fuel injection combustion system University of Basilicata Patent WO2004-106714A1 2004
- Winkler , F. , Schögl , O. , Oswald , R. , Kirchberger , R. Visualization and simulation of a stratified scavenge process for a 50 cm 3 two-stroke engine Graz University of Technology, AVL 7 th International Symposium on Internal Combustion Diagnostics Baden-Baden May 18 19 2006
- Winkler , F. , Schögl , O. , Oswald , R. , and Kirchberger , R. Development of a Low Emission Two-Stroke Engine with Low Pressure Fuel Injection SAE Technical Paper 2006-32-0065 2006 10.4271/2006-32-0065
- Winkler , F. , Oswald , R. , Schögl , O. , Kirchberger , R. et al. Application of Low Pressure Direct Injection and Semi-Direct Injection to a Small Capacity Two-Stroke Engine SAE Technical Paper 2008-32-0059 2008 10.4271/2008-32-0059
- Oswald , R. , Ebner , A. , and Kirchberger , R. High Efficient 125- 250 cm3 LPDI Two-Stroke Engines, a Cheap and Robust Alternative to Four-Stroke Solutions? SAE Technical Paper 2010-32-0019 2010 10.4271/2010-32-0019
- Zauner , G. , Seryl , M. Fuel injection system for a two-stroke engine Bombardier-Rotax Gmbh Patent US6691649B2 2001
- Yoshida , T. , Suzuki , T. , Hirai , R. Fuel injection system for two-cycle engine Yamaha Motor Company 1994
- Motoyama , Y. , Nishimura , H. , Maebashi , K. Method for operating a two-stroke in-cylinder injection engine and such an engine Yamaha Motor Company 1999
- Patrick , T. Direct injection two-stroke engine mapping Bombardier Motor Corporation of America 2001
- Joel , B. , Bergman , M. Two-stroke internal combustion engine Husqvarna AB 2009
- Cumming , B., S. Two-stroke engine with pressurized air direct fuel injection Ford Motor Company 1991
- Trattner , A. , Schmidt , S. , Kirchberger , R. , Eichlseder , H. et al. Future Engine Technology in Hand-Held Power Tools SAE Int. J. Engines 5 4 1912 1929 2012 10.4271/2012-32-0111