This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Turbocharger Matching Method for Reducing Residual Concentration in a Turbocharged Gasoline Engine
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 14, 2015 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
In a turbocharged engine, preserving the maximum amount of exhaust pulse energy for turbine operation will result in improved low end torque and engine transient response. However, the exhaust flow entering the turbine is highly unsteady, and the presence of the turbine as a restriction in the exhaust flow results in a higher pressure at the cylinder exhaust ports and consequently poor scavenging. This leads to an increase in the amount of residual gas in the combustion chamber, compared to the naturally-aspirated equivalent, thereby increasing the tendency for engine knock. If the level of residual gas can be reduced and controlled, it should enable the engine to operate at a higher compression ratio, improving its thermal efficiency.
This paper presents a method of turbocharger matching for reducing residual gas content in a turbocharged engine. The turbine is first scaled to a larger size as a preliminary step towards reducing back pressure and thus the residual gas concentration in-cylinder. However a larger turbine causes a torque deficit at low engine speeds. So in a following step, pulse separation is used. In optimal pulse separation, the gas exchange process in one cylinder is completely unimpeded by pressure pulses emanating from other cylinders, thereby preserving the exhaust pulse energy entering the turbine. A pulse-divided exhaust manifold enables this by isolating the manifold runners emanating from certain cylinder groups, even as far as the junction with the turbine housing.
This combination of appropriate turbine sizing and pulse-divided exhaust manifold design is applied to a Proton 1.6-litre CamPro CFE turbocharged gasoline engine model. The use of a pulse-divided exhaust manifold allows the turbine to be increased in size by 2.5 times (on a mass flow rate basis) while maintaining the same torque and power performance. As a consequence, lower back pressure and improved scavenging reduces the residual concentration by up to 43%, while the brake specific fuel consumption improves by approx. 1%, before any modification to the compression ratio is made.
CitationIsmail, M., Costall, A., Martinez-Botas, R., and Rajoo, S., "Turbocharger Matching Method for Reducing Residual Concentration in a Turbocharged Gasoline Engine," SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1278, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-1278.
- Smokers, R., Vermeulen, R., van Mieghem, R., Gense, R., et al., “Review and analysis of the reduction potential and costs of technological and other measures to reduce CO2-emissions from passenger cars,” Final Report, various organizations, Contract nr. SI2.408212, October 2006.
- Hardcastle, J., “Automotive Council Technology Work Groups Consensus Roadmaps and Workstream Feedback,” Presentationat Low Carbon Vehicle Event, September 2013.
- Edwards, K., Wagner, R., Briggs, T., and Theiss, T., “Defining Engine Efficiency Limits”, in Proc. 17th DEER Conference, Detroit, USA, October 2011.
- Pagot, A., Duparchy, A., Gautrot, X., Leduc, P. et al., “Combustion Approach for Downsizing: the IFP Concept,” Oil & Gas Science and Technology - Revue d'IFP Energies nouvelles 61(1):139-153, 2006.
- Watson, N. and Janota, M. S., Turbocharging the Internal Combustion Engine, The Macmillan Press Ltd, 1982.
- Heywood, J.B., Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1988.
- Tancrez, M., Galindo, J., Guardiola, C., Fajardo, P. et al., “Turbine Adapted Maps for Turbocharger Engine Matching,” Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 35(1):146-153, 2011, doi:10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2010.07.018.
- Pohorelsky, L., Brynych, P., Macek, J., Vallaude, P. et al., “Air System Conception for a Downsized Two-Stroke Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-0831, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-0831.
- Moraal, P. and Kolmanovsky, I., “Turbocharger Modeling for Automotive Control Applications,” SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-0908, 1999, doi:10.4271/1999-01-0908.
- Korakianitis, T. and Sadoi, T., “Turbocharger-Design Effects on Gasoline-Engine Performance,” J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 127(3):525-530, 2005, doi:10.1115/1.1808428.
- Galliot, F., Cheng, W., Cheng, C., Sztenderowicz, M. et al., “In-Cylinder Measurements of Residual Gas Concentration in a Spark Ignition Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 900485, 1990, doi:10.4271/900485.
- Fox, J., Cheng, W., and Heywood, J., “A Model for Predicting Residual Gas Fraction in Spark-Ignition Engines,” SAE Technical Paper 931025, 1993, doi:10.4271/931025.
- Westin, F., Grandin, B., and Ångström, H., “The Influence of Residual Gases on Knock in Turbocharged SI-Engines,” SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-2840, 2000, doi:10.4271/2000-01-2840.
- Möller, C., Johansson, P., Grandin, B., and Lindström, F., “Divided Exhaust Period - A Gas Exchange System for Turbocharged SI Engines,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-1150, 2005, doi:10.4271/2005-01-1150.
- Gundmalm, S., “Divided Exhaust Period on Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines,” Licentiate thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 2013.
- Aghaali, H. and Angstrom, H.-E., “The Exhaust Energy Utilization of a Turbocompound Engine Combined with Divided Exhaust Period,” in Proc. IMechE Int. Conf. on Turbochargers and Turbocharging, pp 179-188, 2014.
- Hu, B., Brace, C., Akehurst, S., Copeland, C., et al., “The Effect of Divided Exhaust Period for Improved Performance in a Highly Downsized Turbocharged Gasoline Engine,” in Proc. IMechE Int. Conf. on Turbochargers and Turbocharging, pp 27-39, 2014.
- Roth, D., Keller, P., and Sisson, J., “Valve-Event Modulated Boost System,” SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-1222, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-1222.
- Roth, D. and Becker, M., “Valve-Event Modulated Boost System: Fuel Consumption and Performance with Scavenge-Sourced EGR,” SAE Int. J. Engines 5(2):538-546, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-0705.
- Gamma-Technologies Inc., GT-SUITE Flow Theory Manual, V7.1, 2010.
- Woollenweber, W., “The Turbocharger - A Vital Part of the Engine Intake and Exhaust Systems,” SAE Technical Paper 700534, 1970, doi:10.4271/700534.
- Capobianco, M. and Polidori, F., “Experimental Investigation on Open Waste-Gate Behaviour of Automotive Turbochargers,” SAE Technical Paper 2008-36-0052, 2008, doi:10.4271/2008-36-0052.
- Marelli, S., and Capobianco, M., “Steady and Pulsating Flow Efficiency of a Waste-gated Turbocharger Radial Flow Turbine for Automotive Application,” Energy 36(1):459-465, 2011, doi:10.1016/j.energy.2010.10.019.
- Wicke, V., Brace, C. J., Deacon, M., and Vaughan, N. D., “Preliminary Results from Driveability Investigations of Vehicles with Continuously Variable Transmissions,” In Proceedings of CVT'99, Eindhoven University of Technology, September 16-17, 1999.