This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Effects of GTL and HVO Blended Fuels on Combustion and Exhaust Emissions of a Common-Rail DI Diesel Technology
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published October 13, 2014 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Formerly, the Hydro-treated Vegetable Oil (HVO) blended fuels has been studied by running the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC) and found that the higher HVO blended fuel can suppress NOX, lowering the particulate matter (PM) while improving the vehicle fuel economy. The result also shown that the 20% HVO + 5%FAME blended with diesel fuel has been proven to compatible with the advance diesel engine technology via the severe engine durability tests and fuel injection system tests. Therefore, the effects of two paraffinic diesel fuels, which are Gas-to-Liquid (GTL) and Hydro-treated Vegetable Oil (HVO), on a common-rail DI diesel engine have been mainly focused in this work. The main objective of this work was to study the relationships between fuel properties and theirs combustion characteristics by analyzing cylinder pressure data and exhaust emissions intensively. Subsequently, the research team needs to quantify the effectiveness of using GTL and HVO as a blending component for superior diesel fuel.
The GTL and HVO were blended with a commercial grade B0 diesel fuel, into three candidate fuels such as 0%, 50% and 100%. All the blended fuels were tested on the engine dynamometer bench under the controlled condition at constant engine speed in two different injection modes (with and without pilot fuel injection). In both conditions, the GTL and HVO blended fuels show some improvement on diesel engine efficiency. Whilst increasing the GTL and HVO fractions, ignition delay for both pilot and main combustion events were decreased responsively, as well as the fraction of premixed combustion. Furthermore, the main combustion phase was also shifted due to the shorter combustion duration. According to the benefit on GTL and HVO fuels combustion characteristic, overall heat release rate curve was shifted and thermal efficiency was increased either. Regarding to the engine-out emissions, it has been found that GTL and HVO fractions help reducing all emission, with an exception for the Nitrogen Oxide (NOX). The reductions of Carbon Monoxide (CO), unburned hydrocarbon (THC) and Soot represent the improvement on combustion efficiency and brake fuel conversion efficiency. In summaries, GTL and HVO blended fuels show highly potential on becoming the fuel for advance common-rail DI diesel engine with the lower exhaust and energy consumption.
|Technical Paper||Effects of Oxygenated Fuel and Cetane Improver on Exhaust Emission from Heavy-Duty DI Diesel Engines|
|Technical Paper||Study on Diesel-LPG Dual Fuel Engines|
|Technical Paper||Advances in Air Charging Technology|
CitationJaroonjitsathian, S., Saisirirat, P., Sivara, K., Tongroon, M. et al., "Effects of GTL and HVO Blended Fuels on Combustion and Exhaust Emissions of a Common-Rail DI Diesel Technology," SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-2763, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-2763.
- Green Car Congress, “ExxonMobil: Diesel Will Surpass Gasoline as the Number One Global Transportation Fuel by 2020,” http://www.greencarcongress.com/2013/03/xom-20130309.html, Mar. 9, 2013.
- Marion, P and Saint-Antonin, V, “Refining 2030,” IFP technical report: Panorama 2012, http://www.ifpenergiesnouvelles.com/content/download/71816/1530644/version/4/file/Panorama2012_06-VA_Refining-2030.pdf, Nov. 2011.
- U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), “The Annual Energy Outlook 2013 with Projection to 2040 (AEO2013),” Annual report DOE/EIA-0383(2013), http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/pdf/0383(2013).pdf, Apr. 2013.
- Chandler, K., Norton, P., and Clark, N., “Alternative Fuel Truck Evaluation Project - Design and Preliminary Results,” SAE Technical paper 981392, 1998, doi:10.4271/981392.
- Norton, P., Vertin, K., Bailey, B., Clark, N. et al., “Emissions from Trucks using Fischer-Tropsch Diesel Fuel,” SAE Technical paper 982526, 1998, doi:10.4271/982526.
- Norton, P., Vertin, K., Clark, N., Lyons, D. et al., “Emissions from Buses with DDC 6V92 Engines Using Synthetic Diesel Fuel,” SAE Technical paper 1999-01-1512, 1999, doi:10.4271/1999-01-1512.
- Johnson, J., Berlowitz, P., Ryan, D., Wittenbrink, R. et al., “Emissions from Fischer- Tropsch Diesel Fuels,” SAE Technical paper 2001-01-3518, 2001, doi:10.4271/2001-01-3518.
- Tsujimura, T., Goto, S., and Matsubara, H., “A Study of PM Emission Characteristics of Diesel Vehicle Fueled with GTL,” SAE Technical paper 2007-01-0028, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-0028.
- Takahashi, K., Sakurai, Y., Furuse, T., Sakuraba, T. et al., “Effects of Cetane Number and Chemical Components on Diesel Emissions and Vehicle Performance,” SAE Technical paper 2009-01-2692, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-2692.
- Nishiumi, R., Yasuda, A., Tsukasaki, Y., and Tanaka, T., “Effects of Cetane Number and Distillation Characteristics of Paraffinic Diesel Fuels on PM Emission from a DI Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical paper 2004-01-2960, 2004, doi:10.4271/2004-01-2960.
- Kitano, K., Misawa, S., Mori, M., Sakata, I. et al., “GTL Fuel Impact on DI Diesel Emissions,” SAE Technical paper 2007-01-2004, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-2004.
- Gjirja, S., Olsson, E., Eklund, A., and Hedemalm, P., “A New Paraffinic Fuel Impact on Emissions and Combustion Characteristics of a Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical paper 2002-01-2218, 2002, doi:10.4271/2002-01-2218.
- Oguma, M., Goto, S., Konno, M., Sugiyama, K. et al., “Experimental Study of Direct Injection Diesel Engine Fueled with Two Types of Gas To Liquid (GTL),” SAE Technical paper 2002-01-2691, 2002, doi:10.4271/2002-01-2691.
- Uchida, N., Hirabayashi, H., Sakata, I., Kitano, K. et al., “Diesel Engine Emissions and Performance Optimization for Neat GTL Fuel,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 1(1):748-762, 2009, doi:10.4271/2008-01-1405.
- Rantanen, L., Linnaila, R., Aakko, P., and Harju, T., “NExBTL - Biodiesel Fuel of the Second Generation,” SAE Technical paper 2005-01-3771, 2005, doi:10.4271/2005-01-3771.
- Aatola, H., Larmi, M., Sarjovaara, T., and Mikkonen, S., “Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil (HVO) as a Renewable Diesel Fuel: Trade-off between NOx, Particulate Emission, and Fuel Consumption of a Heavy Duty Engine,” SAE Int. J. Engines 1(1):1251-1262, 2009, doi:10.4271/2008-01-2500.
- Sugiyama, K., Goto, I., Kitano, K., Mogi, K. et al., “Effects of Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil (HVO) as Renewable Diesel Fuel on Combustion and Exhaust Emissions in Diesel Engine,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 5(1):205-217, 2012, doi:10.4271/2011-01-1954.
- Jaroonjitsathian, S., Tipdecho, C., Sukajit, P., Namthirach, N. et al., “Bio-Hydrogenated Diesel (BHD): Renewable Fuel for Advanced Diesel Technology,” SAE Technical paper 2013-01-0070, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-0070.
- Heywood, JB, “Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals,” McGraw-Inc., Singapore, 1998. ISBN 0-07-028637-X.
- Hulkkonen, T., Hillamo, H., Sarjovaara, T., and Larmi, M., “Experimental Study of Spray Characteristics between Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil (HVO) and Crude Oil Based EN 590 Diesel Fuel,” SAE Technical paper 2011-24-0042, 2011, doi:10.4271/2011-24-0042.