This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.

Drive Cycle Powertrain Efficiencies and Trends Derived from EPA Vehicle Dynamometer Results

Journal Article
ISSN: 1946-3995, e-ISSN: 1946-4002
Published October 13, 2014 by SAE International in United States
Drive Cycle Powertrain Efficiencies and Trends Derived from EPA Vehicle Dynamometer Results
Citation: Thomas, J., "Drive Cycle Powertrain Efficiencies and Trends Derived from EPA Vehicle Dynamometer Results," SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 7(4):1374-1384, 2014,
Language: English


  1. Light-Duty Automotive Technology, Carbon Dioxide Emissions, and Fuel Economy Trends: 1975 - 2013, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Transportation and Air Quality
  2. Sivak, M. and Schoettle, B. (2012b). Average sales-weighted fuel economy of purchased new vehicles [updated monthly]. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute. Available at∼umtriswt/EDI_sales-weighted-mpg.html.
  3. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Final Technical Support Document, Fuel Economy Labeling of Motor Vehicle Revisions to Improve Calculations of Fuel Economy Estimates, EPA420-R-06-017, December 2006.
  4. General website: Where the Energy Goes: Gasoline Vehicles,, Fuel Economy: Where the Energy Goes: Hybrids, Also the Fuel Economy Guides can be found at
  5. Sovran, G., “Revisiting the Formulas for Tractive and Braking Energy on the EPA Driving Schedules,” SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 6(1):269-282, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-0766.
  6. Sovran, G., “The Impact of Regenerative Braking on the Powertrain-Delivered Energy Required for Vehicle Propulsion,” SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-0891, 2011, doi:10.4271/2011-01-0891.
  7. Sovran, G. and Blaser, D., “Quantifying the Potential Impacts of Regenerative Braking on a Vehicle's Tractive-Fuel Consumption for the U.S., European, and Japanese Driving Schedules,” SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-0664, 2006, doi:10.4271/2006-01-0664.
  8. Sovran, G. and Blaser, D., “A Contribution to Understanding Automotive Fuel Economy and Its Limits,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-2070, 2003, doi:10.4271/2003-01-2070.
  9. Hochgraf, C. and Duoba, M., “What if the Prius Wasn't a Hybrid? What if the Corolla Were? An Analysis Based on Vehicle Limited Fuel Consumption and Powertrain and Braking Efficiency,” SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-0834, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-0834.
  10. Hochgraf, C., “2010 North American Light Duty Vehicle Assessment: The Ten Most Efficient Powertrains, The Ten Lowest Energy Consumption Chassis,” SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-0889, 2011, doi:10.4271/2011-01-0889.
  11. SAE International Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice, “Road Load Using Onboard Anemometry and Coastdown Techniques,” SAE Standard J2263, Rev. Dec. 2008.
  12. Thomas, J., Huff, S., and West, B., “Fuel Economy and Emissions Effects of Low Tire Pressure, Open Windows, Roof Top and Hitch-Mounted Cargo, and Trailer,” SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 7(2):862-872, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-1614.
  13. Test Car List Data Files.
  14. Rask, E., Santini, D., and Lohse-Busch, H., “Analysis of Input Power, Energy Availability, and Efficiency during Deceleration for X-EV Vehicles,” SAE Int. J. Alt. Power. 2(2):350-361, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-1473.
  15. Duoba, M., Rask, E., Meyer, M. presentation available at: df.
  16. Lohse-Busch, H., Duoba, M., Rask, E., Stutenberg, K. et al., “Ambient Temperature (20°F, 72°F and 95°F) Impact on Fuel and Energy Consumption for Several Conventional Vehicles, Hybrid and Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles and Battery Electric Vehicle,” SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-1462, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-1462.

Cited By