This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Retail Infrastructure Costs Comparison for Hydrogen and Electricity for Light-Duty Vehicles
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 01, 2014 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Both hydrogen and plug-in electric vehicles offer significant social and environmental benefits to enhance energy security and reduce criteria and greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector. However, the rollout of electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE) and hydrogen retail stations (HRS) requires substantial investments with high risks due to many uncertainties. We compare retail infrastructure costs on a common basis - cost per mile, assuming fueling service to 10% of all light-duty vehicles in a typical 1.5 million person city in 2025. Our analysis considers three HRS sizes, four distinct types of EVSE and two distinct EVSE scenarios. EVSE station costs, including equipment and installation, are assumed to be 15% less than today's costs. We find that levelized retail capital costs per mile are essentially indistinguishable given the uncertainty and variability around input assumptions. Total fuel costs per mile for battery electric vehicle (BEV) and plug-in hybrid vehicle (PHEV) are, respectively, 21% lower and 13% lower than that for hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicle (FCEV) under the home-dominant scenario. Including fuel economies and vehicle costs makes FCEVs and BEVs comparable in terms of costs per mile, and PHEVs are about 10% less than FCEVs and BEVs. To account for geographic variability in energy prices and hydrogen delivery costs, we use the Scenario Evaluation, Regionalization and Analysis (SERA) model and confirm the aforementioned estimate of cost per mile, nationally averaged, and estimate a 15% variability in regional costs of FCEVs and a 5% variability in regional costs for BEVs.
CitationMelaina, M., "Retail Infrastructure Costs Comparison for Hydrogen and Electricity for Light-Duty Vehicles," SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-1969, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-1969.
- Botti, J. and Miller, C., “Powertrains of the Future: Reducing the Impact of Transportation on the Environment,” SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-0991, 1999, doi:10.4271/1999-01-0991.
- Obama, B., State of the Union Address, Washington D.C., available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/state-of-the-union-2011, Jan. 2011.
- California Energy Commission, “2011-2012 Investment Plan for the Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program,” available at http://www.energy.ca.gov/2011publications/CEC-600-2011-006/CEC-600-2011-006-SD.PDF, Feb. 2011.
- Ogden, J. M., Willians, R. H., and Larson, E. D., “Societal lifecycle costs of cars with alternative fuels/engines,” Energy Policy 32 (2004) 7-27, doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00246-X.
- McKinsey & Company. A portfolio of power-trains for Europe: a fact-based analysis - The role of Battery Electric Vehicles, Plus-in Hybrids and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles, http://www.fchju.eu/sites/default/files/documents/Power_trains_for_Europe.pdf, 2010.
- DOE (2012). Total Costs of Ownership of Future Light-Duty Vehicles. U.S. Department of Energy, DE-FOA-0000592. Retrieved February 17, 2012, available at https://www.fedconnect.net/fedconnect/?doc=DE-FOA-0000592&agency=DOE
- Melaina, M. W., Heath, G., Sandor, D., Steward, D.et al., “Alternative Fuel Infrastructure Expansion: Costs, Resources, Production Capacity, and Retail Availability for Low-Carbon Scenarios,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, DOE/GO-102013-3710. Available at: http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy13osti/55640.pdf
- http://www.fuelcelltoday.com/news-events/newsarchive/2012/february/new-hydrogen-stationsadded-globally-in-2011, Feb.2012.
- http://www.navigantresearch.com/research/electric-vehicle-supply-equipment-tracker-1q13, 1Q.2013.
- Melaina, M. and Penev, M., “Hydrogen Station Cost Estimates: Comparing Hydrogen Station Cost Calculator Results with other Recent Estimates,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory NREL/TP-5400-56412, Sept. 2013.
- SAE International Surface Vehicle Information Report, “Utility Factor Definitions for Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles Using Travel Survey Data,” SAE Standard J2841, Rev. Sep. 2010.
- VISION 2011 http://www.transportation.anl.gov/modeling_simulation/VISION
- Puget Sound Regional Council, “Traffic Choices Study - Summary Report,” April 2008.
- Melaina, M.; Bremson, J. “Regularities in Early Hydrogen Station Size Distributions.” Presented at the 26th USAEE/IAEE North American Conference, September 24-27, 2006, Ann Arbor, Michigan. http://www.usaee.org/USAEE2006/papers/marcmelaina.pdf
- Parks, K., Denholm, P. and Markel, T., “Costs and Emissions Associated with Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle Charging in the Xcel Energy Colorado Service Territory,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO. NREL Report No. TP-640-41410, May 2007.
- Melaina, M.W., Steward, D., Penev, M. McQueen, S.et al., “Hydrogen Infrastructure Market Readiness: Opportunities and Potential for Near-term Cost Reductions,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Technical Report NREL/BK-5600-55961, August, 2012, available at http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy12osti/55961.pdf
- U.S. Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Outlook (EIA AEO2103) Reference Case, available at http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/data.cfm accessed on September 16 2013.
- Bush, B., Melaina, M., Penev, M., and Daniel, W., “SERA Scenarios of Early Market Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Introductions: Modeling Framework, Regional Markets, and Station Clustering,” Technical Report. Golden, Colorado: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, September 2013.
- U.S. Census Bureau, “Urban and Rural Classification,” [Online]. Available: http://www.census.gov/geo/reference/urban-rural.html.