This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
GDi Nozzle Parameter Studies Using LES and Spray Imaging Methods
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 01, 2014 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Development of in-cylinder spray targeting, plume penetration and atomization of the gasoline direct-injection (GDi) multi-hole injector is a critical component of combustion developments, especially in the context of the engine downsizing and turbo-charging trend that has been adopted in order to achieve the European target CO2, US CAFE, and concomitant stringent emissions standards. Significant R&D efforts are directed towards the optimization of injector nozzle designs in order to improve spray characteristics. Development of accurate predictive models is desired to understand the impact of nozzle design parameters as well as the underlying physical fluid dynamic mechanisms resulting in the injector spray characteristics.
This publication reports Large Eddy Simulation (LES) analyses of GDi single-hole skew-angled nozzles, with β=30° skew (bend) angle and different nozzle geometries. The objective is to extend previous works to include the effect of nozzle-hole length over diameter ratio (l/d) and fuel injection pressure on spray skew angle, spray plume cone angle and primary breakup length. The authors provide an LES analyses of a single hole nozzle representative of the a purpose-designed GDi multi-hole injector seat. The simulations are confirmed by comparison with the spray near-field breakup structure obtained through optical shadowgraphy and phase-contrast X-ray imaging techniques.
The jet morphology indicates turbulent structures and primary atomization in the immediate vicinity of the nozzle exit. Nozzle l/d reduction produced a notable increase of plume cone angle and spray trajectory deviation (from geometric nozzle axis). The analyses provide insight into the fluid flow within the nozzle generating the observed spray plume changes. Overall, the comparison of LES and spray imaging data shows good predictive model capability with respect to jet breakup morphology, plume trajectory and plume angle.
CitationShost, M., Lai, M., Befrui, B., Spiekermann, P. et al., "GDi Nozzle Parameter Studies Using LES and Spray Imaging Methods," SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-1434, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-1434.
- Rivera, E., Mastro, N., Zizelman, J., Kirwan, J. et al., “Development of Injector for the Direct Injection Homogeneous Market using Design for Six Sigma,” SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-0594, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-0594.
- Befrui, B., Aye, A., Spiekermann, P., Varble, D. et al., “GDi Skew-Angled Nozzle Flow and Near-Field Spray Analysis using Optical and X-Ray Imaging and VOF-LES Computational Fluid Dynamics,” SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-0255, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-0255.
- Befrui, B., Corbinelli, G., D'Onofrio, M., and Varble, D., “GDI Multi-Hole Injector Internal Flow and Spray Analysis,” SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-1211, 2011, doi:10.4271/2011-01-1211.
- Befrui, B., Corbinelli, G., Spiekermann, P., Shost, M. et al., “Large Eddy Simulation of GDI Single-Hole Flow and Near-Field Spray,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 5(2):620-636, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-0392.
- Befrui, B., Spiekermann, P., Shost, M., Lai, M.-C., “VoF-LES Studies of GDi Multi-Hole Nozzle Plume Primary Breakup and Comparison with Imaging Data,” Proceedings ILASS-Europe 2013, 25th European Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Chania, Greece, 1-4 September 2013.
- Befrui, B., Corbinelli, G., Hoffmann, G., andrews, R. et al., “Cavitation and Hydraulic Flip in the Outward-Opening GDi Injector Valve-Group,” SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-1483, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-1483.
- de Villiers, E., Gosman, A., and Weller, H., “Large Eddy Simulation of Primary Diesel Spray Atomization,” SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-0100, 2004, doi:10.4271/2004-01-0100.
- Moon, S., Liu, Z., Gao, J., Dufresne, E., Fezzaa, K., Wang, J., Xie, X., Lai, M.-C., “Ultrafast X-ray Phase-Contrast Imaging of High-Speed Fuel Sprays from a Two-Hole Diesel Nozzle,” Proceedings ILASS-Americas 2010, 22nd Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Cincinnati, OH, May 2010.
- Lai, M., Zheng, Y., Shost, M., Xie, X. et al., “Characterization of Internal flow and Spray of Multihole DI Gasoline Spray using X-ray Imaging and CFD,” SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-1881, 2011, doi:10.4271/2011-01-1881.
- Brackbill, J. U., Kothe, D. B., Zemach, C., “A Continuum Method for Modelling surface Tension,” J. Comp. Phys., 100, 335-354, 1992.
- Yoshizawa, A., “A Statistically-Derived Subgrid-Scale Kinetic Energy Model for the Large Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Flows,” J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 54 (8), 2834-2839, 1985.
- Ubbink, O., “Numerical Prediction of Two Fluid Systems with Sharp Interfaces,” PhD Thesis, Imperial College of Science, Medicine and Technology, University of London, 1997
- OpenCFD Ltd., OpenFOAM - User Guide, http://www.opencfd.com
- Weller, H., “A New Approach to VOF-based Interface Capturing Methods for Incompressible and Compressible Flows,” OpenCFD Ltd., Technical Report TR/HGW/04, 2008 (unpublished).
- Gomaa, H., Kumar, S., Huber, C., Weigand, B. and Peters, B., “Numerical Comparison of 3D Jet Breakup Using a Compression Scheme and an Interface Reconstruction Based VOF Code,” Proceedings ILASS-Europe 2011, 24th European Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Estoril, Portugal, September 2011
- Jasak, H, Weller, H. G., Gosman, A. D., “High Resolution NVD Differencing Scheme for Arbitrary Unstructured Meshes,” Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 31:431-449, 1999.
- Issa, R.I., “Solution of the Implicitly Discretized Fluid Flow Equations by Operator Splitting,” J. Comp. Phys. 62, 40-65, 1986.