This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Estimation of Particulate Matter in Direct Injection Gasoline Engines by Non-Combustion CFD
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 01, 2014 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
A technique of estimating particulate matter (PM) from gasoline direct injection engines is proposed that is used to compute mass density and particle number density of PM by using fuel mass in rich mixtures obtained by using non-combustion computational fluid dynamics (CFD).
The CFD code that was developed by the authors employed a Cartesian coordinates system as a discretization method and large eddy simulation (LES) as a turbulence model. Fuel spray droplets were treated with the discrete droplet model (DDM). The code was verified with some experimental data such as those obtained from in-cylinder gas-flows with a laser Doppler velocimeter (LDV) and in-cylinder fuel concentration with laser induced fluorescence (LIF).
PM emissions from a single-cylinder gasoline direct injection engine were measured with an electrical low pressure impactor (ELPI) to determine the model constants that were required in the estimation model. We confirmed that the technique could be applied to various engine operating conditions and fuel spray patterns. Because combustion-phase calculations are not required to estimate PM with the method, it has been a useful way of exploring optimum injection timing and/or spray specifications within short periods.
Split injection to reduce PM in a gasoline direct injection engine was investigated with the method. PM was significantly reduced with split-injection by optimizing the injection timing. However, the effect of reducing PM with split injection was greatly affected by the spray patterns. The reason for this was clarified by analyzing the simulation results.
CitationSukegawa, Y., Kumano, K., and Ogata, K., "Estimation of Particulate Matter in Direct Injection Gasoline Engines by Non-Combustion CFD," SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-1142, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-1142.
- Carbonell D., Oliva A., and Perez-Segarra C. D., “Implementation of two-equation soot flamelet models for laminar diffusion flames”, Combustion and Flame, Vol. 156, 2009.
- Wen Z., Yun S., Thomson M. J., and Lightstone M. F., “Modeling soot formation in turbulent kerosene/air jet diffusion flames”, Combustion and Flame Vol. 135, 2003.
- Frenklach M. and Harris J.S., “Aerosol Dynamics Modeling Using the Method of Moments”, J. Colloid and Interface Science, Vol. 118, No. 1.
- Frenklach M. and Wang H., “Detailed Mechanism and Modeling of Soot Particle Formation”, Soot Formation in Combustion Mechanisms and Models (Bockhorn H., Ed.), Springer Series in Chemical Physics, Vol. 59, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994.
- Akihama, K., Takatori, Y., Inagaki, K., Sasaki, S. et al., “Mechanism of the Smokeless Rich Diesel Combustion by Reducing Temperature,” SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-0655, 2001, doi:10.4271/2001-01-0655.
- Gentry R. A., Martin R. E., and Daly B. J. “An Eulerian differencing method for unsteady compressible flow problems”, Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 1, Issue 1, 1966.
- Smagorinsky, J., “General circulation experiments with the primitive equations”, The Basic Experiment, Monthly Weather Review, 91, 1963.
- Dukowicz J. K., “A Particle-Fluid Numerical Model for Liquid Sprays”, J. Comp. Physics, Vol. 35, 1980.
- Wakisaka T., Isshiki Y., Noda T., Matsui A., and Akamatsu S., “Numerical Analysis of Spray Phenomena in Fuel Injection Engines”, COMODIA 94, 1994.
- Obokata T., Ishima T., Kato M., Yokota H., and Kaneko M., “Gas Flow Evaluation in the Cylinder of a 4-stroke Motored Engine by Means of LDA”, COMODIA 2008.
- Reitz, R. and Diwakar, R., “Effect of Drop Breakup on Fuel Sprays,” SAE Technical Paper 860469, 1986, doi:10.4271/860469.