This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Investigation of On-Road Crosswinds on Interstate Tractor-Trailer Aerodynamic Efficiency
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 01, 2014 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Heavy duty tractor-trailers under freeway operations consume about 65% of the total engine shaft energy to overcome aerodynamic drag force. Vehicles are exposed to on-road crosswinds which cause change in pressure distribution with a relative wind speed and yaw angle. The objective of this study was to analyze the drag losses as a function of on-road wind conditions, on-road vehicle position and trajectory. Using coefficient of drag (CD) data available from a study conducted at NASA Ames, Geographical Information Systems model, time-varying weather data and road data, a generic model was built to identify the yaw angles and the relative magnitude of wind speed on a given route over a given time period. A region-based analysis was conducted for a study on interstate trucking operation by employing I-79 running through West Virginia as a case study by initiating a run starting at 12am, 03/03/2012 out to 12am, 03/05/2012. Results showed that vehicles which travelled the route on 03/04/2012 after 2pm were subjected to higher yaw angles (9 - 14 degrees) compared to vehicles travelling between 12am and 2pm on the same day. Similar analysis on 03/03/2012 for the same route concluded vehicles travelling between 11:30am and 4pm were subjected to lower yaw angles (0-6 degrees) compared to vehicles travelling through the rest of the day (9 - 16 degrees). A temporal analysis revealed that CD values may vary significantly for vehicles travelling the same route but a few hours apart.
CitationSathiamoorthy, B., Robinson, M., Fedorko, E., and Clark, N., "Investigation of On-Road Crosswinds on Interstate Tractor-Trailer Aerodynamic Efficiency," SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-0608, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-0608.
- Yacobucci Brent D., Canis Bill, and Lattanzio Richard K., “Automobile and Truck Fuel Economy (CAFE) and Greenhouse Gas standards,” CRS report for Congress R-42721, 2012.
- US Department of Energy. (Accessed - January, 2013) Research and Development Opportunities for Heavy Trucks. http://www1.eere.energy.gov/vehiclesandfuels/pdfs/truck_efficiency_paper_v2.pdf. [Online].
- United States Environmental Protection Agency, “EPA and NHTSA Adopt First-Ever Program to Reduce Greenhouse Emissions Improve Fuel Economy in Medium-Heavy-Duty Vehicles,” EPA-420-F-11-031, 2011.
- Storms, B. and Ross, J., “Aerodynamic Drag Reduction of the Underbody of a Class-8 Tractor-Trailer,” SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-3532, 2006, doi:10.4271/2006-01-3532.
- Office of Transportation and Air Quaility, “Paving the Way Toward Cleaner, More Efficient Trucks,” Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Regulatory Announcement EPA-420-F-11-032, 2011.
- Saunders, J., Watkins, S., Hoffmann, P., and Buckley, F., “Comparison of On-Road and Wind-Tunnel Tests for Tractor-Trailer Aerodynamic Devices, and Fuel Savings Predictions,” SAE Technical Paper 850286, 1985, doi:10.4271/850286.
- U.S. Department of Transportation, “Factors and Considerations for Establishing a Fuel Efficiency Regulatory Program for Commercial Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicles,” National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT Technical Report 2010.
- Gavirluta C., Spataru S., Mosincat I., and Citro C., “Complete Methodology on Generating Realistic Wind Speed Profiles Based on Measurements,” in International Conference on Renewable Energies and Power Quality, Satiago De Compostela, 81ea3cd2-1360-4394-bd99-2e20802b0f7c, 2012.
- (NOAA), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (Accessed - July, 2012) Automated Surface Observing System (ASOS - data access - land- based stations). ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/asos-onemin/ [Online].
- International Council on Clean Transportation, Institute for Internal Combustion Engines and Thermodynamics, “Evaluation of Fuel Efficiency Improvements in the Heavy-Duty Vechicle (HDV) Sector from Improved trailer and tire designs by application of a new test procedure,” I-24/2011 Hb-Em 18/11/679, 2011.
- United States Environmental Protection Agency, “Interim Test Method for Verifying Fuel-Saving Components for Smartwa: Modifications to SAE J1321,” EPA-420-F-09-046, 2011.
- Ang-Olson Jeffrey and Schroeer Will, “Energy Efficiency Strategies for Freight Trucking: Potential Impact on Fuel Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 1815, no. 2002 Energy, Air Quality, and Fuels, pp. 11-18, January 2007.
- Drollinger, R., “Heavy Duty Truck Aerodynamics,” SAE Technical Paper 870001, 1987, doi:10.4271/870001.
- Gong Xu, Gu Zhengqi, and Li Zhenlei, “Surrogate Model for Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of a Tractor-Trailer in Crosswinds,” Journal of Automobile Engineering, Vol. 226, no. 10, pp. 1325-1339, October 2012.
- Roy, S. and Srinivasan, P., “External Flow Analysis of a Truck for Drag Reduction,” SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-3500, 2000, doi:10.4271/2000-01-3500.
- Wood, R. and Bauer, S., “Simple and Low-Cost Aerodynamic Drag Reduction Devices for Tractor-Trailer Trucks,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-3377, 2003, doi:10.4271/2003-01-3377.
- Salari Kambiz, Ortega Jason, Castelucci Paul, and Sleezak Lee, “Heavy Duty Flow Conditioning: Application to the Tractor/Trailer Gap and Trailer Base,” U.S. Department of Energy - Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Washington, DC, Annual Progress Report FY- 2006, 2007.
- Sathiamoorthy Bharadwaj, Clark Nigel, and Fedorko Evan, “Methodology to Predict Real World Aerodynamic Drag Losses Due to On-Road Cross-Wind Effects,” in 23rd CRC Real World Emissions Workshop, San Diego, CA, 2013.
- US dept of Commerce - NOAA/NWS. (Accessed - April, 2012) Degrib (NDFD GRIB2 Decoder). [Online]. http://www.nws.noaa.gov/mdl/degrib/txtview.php?file=tkdegrib.txt&dir=base [Online].
- National Center for Environmental Prediction - Earth System Research Laboratory. (Accessed - May, 2012) Rapid Refresh Review - Hourly Updated Models. http://ruc.noaa.gov/pdf/RR.NCEP-PSR-7dec2011.pdf [Online].
- Huang Xiang Yu, Wang Wei, Kim Ju Won, Skamarock Bill, and Henderson Tom, “Development of Digital Filter Initialization for WRF and its Implementation at IUM,” in Preprints: 8th Annual WRF User's Workshop, Boulder, 2007.
- Smith Tracy Lorraine, Benjamin Stanley G., Brown John M., and Weygandt Steven, “Convection Forecasts From the Hourly Updated, 3-KM High resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) Model,” in Preprints 24th Conference on Severe Local Storms, Amer. Meteor. Soc., Savannah, 2008.
- Alexander Curtis, Weygandt Steve, Benjamin Stan, and James Eric, “High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) Model and Production Advancements for 2013 with Targeted Improvements for Reliable Convective Weather Guidance in the National Airspace System,” in 16th Conference on Aviation, Range, and Airspace Meteorology, Austin, TX, 2013.
- Allen Richard, Pereira Luis, Dirk Raes, and Smith Martin, “Crop evapotranspiration - Guidelines for computing crop water requirements - FAO Irrigation and drainage,” Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, Technical Report 1998.
- Maling D.H., “Measuring from Maps: Principles and Methods of Cartometry,” in Coordinate Systems and Map Projections Book, 2nd edition.: Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1989, p. 476.
- Environmental Protection Agency, “Greenhouse Gas Emissions Model (GEM) User Guide,” U.S. EPA, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Assessment and Standards Division, User Guide EPA-420-B-11-019, 2011.
- Cooper Kevin, “Commercial Vehicle Aerodynamic Drag Reduction: Historical Perspective as a Guide,” in The Aerodynamics of Heavy Vehicles: Trucks, Buses, and Trains, McCallen Rose, Browand Fred, and Ross James, Eds., 2004, ch. Applied and Computational Mechnanics Vol. 19, p. 11.