This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Effect of Rear-End Extensions on the Aerodynamic Forces of an SUV
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 01, 2014 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Under a global impulse for less man-made emissions, the automotive manufacturers search for innovative methods to reduce the fuel consumption and hence the CO2-emissions. Aerodynamics has great potential to aid the emission reduction since aerodynamic drag is an important parameter in the overall driving resistance force.
As vehicles are considered bluff bodies, the main drag source is pressure drag, caused by the difference between front and rear pressure. Therefore increasing the base pressure is a key parameter to reduce the aerodynamic drag. From previous research on small-scale and full-scale vehicles, rear-end extensions are known to have a positive effect on the base pressure, enhancing pressure recovery and reducing the wake area.
This paper investigates the effect of several parameters of these extensions on the forces, on the surface pressures of an SUV in the Volvo Cars Aerodynamic Wind Tunnel and compares them with numerical results. To decrease the dependency of other effects within the engine bay and underbody, the SUV has been investigated in a closed-cooling configuration with upper and lower grille closed and with a smoothened underbody. These results might change if the study would be conducted with a less smooth underbody and in an open-cooling configuration. Extensions with different shapes and dimensions have been placed around the perimeter of the base exterior. The chosen design philosophy of the extensions allowed for different combinations with variable inclination angles depending on their position along the base perimeter, multiple extension lengths and shapes to be investigated.
The results show that the extension shape is an important factor in reducing the aerodynamic drag. Significant drag reductions could be obtained while maintaining the vehicle's rear lift within acceptable levels for stability with a kicker attached to the extension. The investigation shows the reduction with a kicker holds for up to 7.5° yaw angles. With a beneficial shape, the extension length can be significantly reduced. The reduced drag is visible in the wake by a more concentric wake.
CitationSterken, L., Lofdahl, L., Sebben, S., and Walker, T., "Effect of Rear-End Extensions on the Aerodynamic Forces of an SUV," SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-0602, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-0602.
- Hucho, W.-H., “Aerodynamics” of Road Vehicles,” Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., Warrendale, PA, ISBN: 978-0-7680-0029-0, 1998.
- Howell, J., Sims-Williams, D., Sprot, A., Hamlin, F. et al., “Bluff Body Drag Reduction with Ventilated Base Cavities,” SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 5(1):152-160, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-0171.
- Irving Brown, Y., Windsor, S., and Gaylard, A., “The Effect of Base Bleed and Rear Cavities on the Drag of an SUV,” SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-0512, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-0512.
- Cooper, K., “Truck Aerodynamics Reborn - Lessons from the Past,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-3376, 2003, doi:10.4271/2003-01-3376.
- Browand, F., Radovich, C., and Boivin, M., “Fuel Savings by Means of Flaps Attached to the Base of a Trailer: Field Test Results,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-1016, 2005, doi:10.4271/2005-01-1016.
- Beaudoin, J.F., and Aider, J.-L., “Drag and lift reduction of a 3D bluff body using flaps,” Exp Fluids (2008) 44:491501, doi:10.1007/s00348-007-0392-1.
- Bannister, M., “Summary of Results from FU Aerodynamic Tests on a 1:5 Scale Model of a Modified XC90 in MWT,” Volvo Internal Report, 2006.
- Sebben, S., “AE Project on Advanced Flow Control, Part II: 3D CFD Calculations,” Volvo Internal Report, 2006.
- Morelli, A., “A New Aerodynamic Approach to Advanced Automobile Basic Shapes,” SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-0491, 2000, doi:10.4271/2000-01-0491.
- Sterken, L., Sebben, S., Walker, T., and Lofdahl, L., “Experimental and Numerical Investigations of the Base Wake on an SUV,” SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-0464, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-0464.
- Sternéus, J., Walker, T., and Bender, T., “Upgrade of the Volvo Cars Aerodynamic Wind Tunnel,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-1043, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-1043.
- Sebben, S., and Mlinaric, P., “Investigation of the Influence of Tyre Deflection and Tyre Contact Patch on CFD Predictions of Aerodynamic Forces on a Passenger Car,” MIRA International Vehicle Aerodynamics Conference, October 2008.
- Spalart, P.R., Deck, S., Shur, M.L., Squires, K.D. et al., “A new version of detached-eddy simulation, resistant to ambiguous grid densities,” Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. (2006) 20:181-195, doi:10.1007/s00162-006-0015-0.
- De Villiers, E., “The Potential of Large Eddy Simulation for the Modeling of Wall Bounded Flows,” PhD Thesis, Imperial College, London, UK, 2006.
- Menter, F.R., “Best Practice: Scale-Resolving Simulations in ANSYS CFD,” ANSYS Germany GmbH, April 2012.
- Cogotti, A., “A Strategy for Optimum Surveys of Passenger-Car Flow Fields,” SAE Technical Paper 890374, 1989, doi:10.4271/890374.
- Ivanic, T., and Gilliéron, P., “Aerodynamic drag and ways to reduce it,” Lecture Series VKI Institute, Brussels, 2005.
- Ahmed, S., Ramm, G., and Faltin, G., “Some Salient Features Of The Time-Averaged Ground Vehicle Wake,” SAE Technical Paper 840300, 1984, doi:10.4271/840300.