This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Evaluation of Different Roof Strength Methods in Quasi-Static and Dynamic Rollover Tests Using Finite Element Analysis of a 2003 Ford Explorer Model
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 01, 2014 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Different roof strength methods are applied on the 2003 Ford Explorer finite element (FE) model to achieve the current Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 216 requirements. Two different modification approaches are utilized. Additionally, the best design of each approach is tested dynamically, in rollover and side impact simulations.
In the first approach, several roll cage designs are integrated in all pillars, roof cross-members, and in the side roof rails. A roll cage design with a strength-to-weight ratio (SWR) of 3.58 and 3.40 for driver and passenger sides, respectively, with a weight penalty of 18.54 kg is selected for dynamic test assessments.
The second approach investigates different localized reinforcements to achieve a more reasonable weight penalty. A localized reinforcement of the B-pillar alone with a tube meets the new FMVSS 216 requirements with a weight penalty of 4.52 kg and is selected for dynamic analyses.
The two selected reinforcement designs are tested in a dynamic unconstrained rollover crash under different pitch angles while using common rollover initial conditions. Based on the limited dynamic analysis, the localized reinforcement has proved to be an effective approach for front row seat protection. However, passengers in the rear seats are better protected by the roll cage solution.
Additionally, side impact analysis is examined for both approaches. Overall, the influence of both reinforcement methods on the side impact is small and therefore deemed acceptable.
These methods can be incorporated in vehicle's roof structure or taken into consideration for future vehicle designs.
CitationAlbrodt, S., Tahan, F., and Digges, K., "Evaluation of Different Roof Strength Methods in Quasi-Static and Dynamic Rollover Tests Using Finite Element Analysis of a 2003 Ford Explorer Model," SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-0532, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-0532.
- U. S. Department of Transportation Traffic Safety Facts Annual Report 2011, A Compilation of Motor Vehicle Crash Data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System and the General Estimates System 2013
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration FMVSS 216 Final ruling Docket No. NHTSA-2009-0093, RIN 2127-AG51 May 2009
- Brumbelow , M. Roof strength and injury risk in Rollover Insurance Institute for Rollover Crashworthiness Workshop 23 July 2010
- Scheub , J. Influence of Different Platen Angles and Selected Reinforced Roof Structure on the Quasi-Static Roof Strength of a 2003 Ford Explorer FE Model Thesis The George Washington University Aug. 2012
- Schmitt , A. Investigation of different roof strengthening methods to gain an elastically responding roof in static and dynamic rollover tests Thesis The George Washington University Aug. 2009
- National Crash Analysis Center Ford Explorer Model The George Washington University June 2007 http://www.ncac.gwu.edu/vml/models.html
- Office of the Federal Register Federal Register 36 236 23299 23300 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration - Final rule Docket no. 2-6, Notice 5; 49 CFR Part 571 - Motor Vehicle Safety Standards Washington, DC National Archives and Records Administration 1971
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Laboratory Test Procedure for FMVSS No. 216, Roof Crush Resistance U.S. Department of Transportation Washington, DC 2009
- Tahan F. , Digges K. and Mohan P. Sensitivity Study of Vehicle Rollovers to Various Initial Conditions - Finite Element Model Based Analysis The George Washington University 2010
- U. S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Laboratory test procedure for FMVSS No. 214, dynamic side impact protection 2001