This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Passive Pedestrian Protection Approach for Vehicle Hoods
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 01, 2014 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Global regulations intended to enhance pedestrian protection in a vehicle collision, thereby reducing the severity of pedestrian injuries, are presenting significant challenges to vehicle designers. Vehicle hoods, for example, must absorb a significant amount of energy over a small area while precluding impact with a hard engine compartment component. In this paper, a simple passive approach for pedestrian protection is introduced in which thin metal alloy sheets are bent to follow a C-shaped cross-sectional profile thereby giving them energy absorbing capacity during impact when affixed to the underside of a hood. Materials considered were aluminum (6111-T4, 5182-O) and magnesium (AZ31-O, AZ61-O, ZEK100) alloys. To evaluate the material effect on the head injury criterion (HIC) score without a hood, each C-channel absorber was crushed in a drop tower test using a small dart. Two high speed cameras captured dart image data before and during impact from which HIC scores were computed with stereo digital image correlation (DIC). The only absorber material that fractured during impact, Mg AZ31-O, had the lowest and hence most favorable HIC score relative to those materials that crushed without fracturing. Test results were then compared with predictions from finite element (FE) simulations of the dart impact tests for Mg AZ31-O and Al 5182-O. Good correlation between the tests and simulations was achieved indicating that FE simulations can reliably be used in material selection and design optimization of energy absorbers as passive means for pedestrian protection.
CitationSavic, V., Pawlicki, M., Krajewski, P., Voss, M. et al., "Passive Pedestrian Protection Approach for Vehicle Hoods," SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-0513, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-0513.
- Gandhi, T. and Trivedi, M.M., “Pedestrian Protection Systems: Issues, survey, and Challenges,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 8:413-430, 2007, doi:10.1109/TITS.2007.903444.
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), “Vehicle Safety and Fuel Economy Rulemaking and Research Priority Plan 2011-2013,” Mar. 2011 http://www.nhtsa.gov/Research.
- Toccalino, E., “Passenger Vehicle Safety Rating (Euro & USNCAP, IIHS): Performance Overview and Energy Management Solutions,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-0230, 2003, doi:10.4271/2003-01-0230.
- Mizuno, K. and Kajzer, J., “Head Injuries in Vehicle-Pedestrian Impact,” SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-0157, 2000, doi:10.4271/2000-01-0157.
- Lewandowski, J., “Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 208 - Occupant Crash Protection: Right Front Passenger Test Methodologies,” SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-0720, 2006, doi:10.4271/2006-01-0720.
- United Nations Global Technical Regulation No.9, Pedestrian Safety, Nov. 2008.
- Department of Transportation (US), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), “Traffic Safety Facts 2010: Pedestrians”, DOT HS 811 625, Aug. 2012.
- Department of Transportation (US), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), “Traffic Safety Facts 2011: Children”, DOT HS 811 767, May 2013.
- Beck, L.F., Dellinger, A.M., and O'Neil, M.E., “Motor Vehicle Crash Injury Rates by Mode of Travel, United States: Using Exposure-Based Methods to Quantify Differences,” American Journal of Epidemiology 166(2):212-218, 2007, doi:10.1093/aje/kwm064.
- Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards and Regulations, “FMVSS 208 - Occupant Crash Protection”, Oct. 1999.
- European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP) Pedestrian Testing Protocol, ver. 7.0, March 2013.
- Hutchinson, T.P., Anderson, R.W.G., and Searson, D.J., “Pedestrian Headform Testing: Inferring Performance at Impact Speeds and for Headform Masses not Tested, and Estimating Average Performance in a Range of Real-world Conditions,” Traffic Injury Prevention 13(4):402-4011, 2012, doi:10.1080/15389588.2012.660252.
- Versace, J., “A Review of the Severity Index,” SAE Technical Paper 710881, 1971, doi:10.4271/710881.
- Simms, C., and Wood, D., “Pedestrian and Cyclist Impact: A Biomechanical Perspective,” Springer, New York, ISBN 978-90-481-2742-9, 2009.
- Feist, F., Gugler, J., Arregui-Dalmases, C., del Pozo, E. et al., “Pedestrian Collisions with Flat-fronted Vehicles: Injury Patterns and Importance of Rotational Accelerators as a Predictor for Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI),” Proceedings of the 21st International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Paper 09-0264, Stuttgart, Germany, 2009.
- Newman, J., “A Generalized Acceleration Model for Brain Injury Threshold (GAMBIT),” Proceedings of International Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact, Zurich, Switzerland, 1986.
- Newman, J. and Shewchenko, N., “A Proposed New Biomechanical Head Injury Assessment Function - the Maximum Power Index,” 2000.
- Gurdjian, E., Lissner, H., Latimer, R., Haddad, B. et al., “Quantitative Determination of Acceleration and Intercranial Pressure in Experimental Head Injury,” Neurology 3:417-423, 1953.
- Lissner, H.R., Lebow, M. and Evans, E.G., “Experimental Studies on the Relation between Acceleration and Intracranial Pressure Changes in Man,” Surgery, Gynecology, Obstetrics 111:329-338, 1960.
- Gadd, C., “Use of a Weighted-Impulse Criterion for Estimating Injury Hazard,” SAE Technical Paper 660793, 1966, doi:10.4271/660793.
- Savic, V., Hector, L., and Snavely, K., “Effects of Gage Section Geometry on Tensile Material Properties by Digital Image Correlation,” SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-0184, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-0184.
- Sutton, M.A., Orteu, J.J. and Schrier, H.W., “Image Correlation for Shape, Motion and Deformation Measurements,” Springer, New York, ISBN 978-0-387-78747-3, 2009.
- Redlunn, B., Daly, S., Hector, L.G. Jr., Zavattieri, P.D. et al., “Tips and Tricks for Characterizing Shape Memory Wire Part 5: Full-Field Strain Measurement by Digital Image Correlation,” Experimental Techniques 37(3):62-78, 2013, doi:10.1111/j.1747-1567.2011.00717.x.
- Wu, J. and Beaudet, B., “Optimization of Head Impact Waveform to Minimize HIC,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0759, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-0759.
- Ji, M., “The Crash Depth Necessary in the Frontal Structure of a Car for Pedestrian Head Protection,” SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-1207, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-1207.
- Kerkeling, C., Schaefer, J., and Thompson, G-M., “Structural Hood and Hinge Concepts for Pedestrian Protection,” Proceedings of the 19th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Paper 05-0304, Washington, DC, 2005
- Liu, Q., Xia, Y., Zhou, Q., and Wang, J-T., “Design Analysis of a Sandwich Hood Structure for Pedestrian protection,” Proceedings of the 21st International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Paper 09-0356, Stuttgart, Germany, 2009