This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Emission Reduction Technologies for the Future Low Emission Rail Diesel Engines: EGR vs SCR
Technical Paper
2013-24-0087
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The EU emission standards for new rail Diesel engines are becoming even more stringent. EGR and SCR technologies can both be used to reduce NOx emissions; however, the use of EGR is usually accompanied by an increase in PM emissions and may require a DPF. On the other hand, the use of SCR requires on-board storage of urea. Thus, it is necessary to study these trade-offs in order to understand how these technologies can best be used in rail applications to meet new emission standards.
The present study assesses the application of these technologies in Diesel railcars on a quantitative basis using one and three dimensional numerical simulation tools. In particular, the study considers a 560 kW railcar engine with the use of either EGR or SCR based solutions for NOx reduction. The NOx and PM emissions performances are evaluated over the C1 homologation cycle.
The simulation results indicate that either EGR or SCR based solutions can be used to achieve Stage IIIB NOx limits for the 560 kW engine, with an acceptable trade-off regarding BSFC in the case of EGR solutions. In the case of EGR, though, a DPF is necessary to meet Stage IIIB PM limits. Furthermore, SCR based solutions have the potential to go beyond the Stage IIIB NOx limit by scaling up the size of the SCR device and the on-board urea storage.
Recommended Content
Authors
- Carlo Beatrice - Istituto Motori CNR
- Natale Rispoli - Istituto Motori CNR
- Gabriele Di Blasio - Istituto Motori CNR
- Giorgos Patrianakos - CERTH/CPERI
- Margaritis Kostoglou - CERTH/CPERI
- Athanasios Konstandopoulos - CERTH/CPERI
- Abdurrahman Imren - Chalmers Univ. of Technology
- Ingemar Denbratt - Chalmers Univ. of Technology
- Roberto Palacin - Newcastle University
Topic
Citation
Beatrice, C., Rispoli, N., Di Blasio, G., Patrianakos, G. et al., "Emission Reduction Technologies for the Future Low Emission Rail Diesel Engines: EGR vs SCR," SAE Technical Paper 2013-24-0087, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4271/2013-24-0087.Also In
References
- “Change in emissions by transport sub-sector for NOX and PM2.5 (EEA - 32)”, (2009), Environmental Energy Agency, www.eea.europa.eu.
- GT-Suite 7.2 “Manual” (2011), Gamma Technologies.
- Website: www.dieselnet.com; accessed January 2013.
- Merkel, G., Cutler, W., and Warren, C., “Thermal Durability of Wall-Flow Ceramic Diesel Particulate Filters,” SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-0190, 2001, doi:10.4271/2001-01-0190.
- Koebel M., Madia G., Elsener M., “Selective catalytic reduction of NO and NO2 at low temperatures”, Catalysis Today 73 (2002) 239-247.
- Winkler, C., Florchinger, P., Patil, M., Gieshoff, J. et al., “Modeling of SCR DeNOx Catalyst - Looking at the Impact of Substrate Attributes,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-0845, 2003, doi:10.4271/2003-01-0845.
- Torres DJ, Trujillo MF. KIVA-4: an unstructured ALE code for compressible gas flow with sprays. Journal Computational Physics 2006; 219:943-975.
- Golovitchev, V., Nordin, N., Jarnicki, R., and Chomiak, J., “3-D Diesel Spray Simulations Using a New Detailed Chemistry Turbulent Combustion Model,” SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-1891, 2000, doi:10.4271/2000-01-1891.
- Imren, A., Golovitchev, V., Sorusbay, C., and Valentino, G., “The Full Cycle HD Diesel Engine Simulations Using KIVA-4 Code,” SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-2234, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010- 01-2234.
- Konstandopoulos, A. and Johnson, J., “Wall-Flow Diesel Particulate Filters-Their Pressure Drop and Collection Efficiency,” SAE Technical Paper 890405, 1989, doi:10.4271/890405.
- Konstandopoulos A.G. and Kostoglou M. “Reciprocating flow regeneration of soot filters” Combustion and Flame 121, 488-500, 2000.
- Konstandopoulos, A., Kostoglou, M., Skaperdas, E., Papaioannou, E. et al., “Fundamental Studies of Diesel Particulate Filters: Transient Loading, Regeneration and Aging,” SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-1016, 2000, doi:10.4271/2000-01-1016.
- Kostoglou M., Housiada P., Konstandopoulos A.G., “Multi-channel simulation of regeneration in honeycomb monolithic diesel particulate filters” Chemical Engineering Science 58 (2003) 3273-3283.
- Konstandopoulos, A., Kostoglou, M., Vlachos, N., and Kladopoulou, E., “Progress in Diesel Particulate Filter Simulation,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-0946, 2005, doi:10.4271/2005-01-0946.
- Konstandopoulos, A., Kostoglou, M., and Lorentzou, S., “Wall-Scale Reaction Models in Diesel Particulate Filters,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-1130, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-1130.
- Konstandopoulos, A., Kostoglou, M., Lorentzou, S., Pagkoura, C. et al., “Soot Oxidation Kinetics in Diesel Particulate Filters,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-1129, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-1129.
- Lietti L., Nova I., Tronconi E., Forzatti P., “Transient kinetic study of the SCR-DeNOx reaction”, Catalysis Today 45 (1998) 85-92.
- Troconi E., Cavanna A., Forzatti P., “Unsteady Analysis of NO Reduction over Selective Catalytic Reduction - DeNOx Monolith Catalysts”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 37 (1998) 2341-2349.
- Dubien C., Schweich D., Mabilon G., Martin B., Prigent M., “Three-way catalytic converter modeling: fast- and slow-oxidizing hydrocarbons, inhibiting species, and steam-reforming reaction”, Chemical Engineering Science, Vol 53, No 3, pp.471-481, 1998.