This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Assessing the Loss Mechanisms Associated with Engine Downsizing, Boosting and Compression Ratio Change
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 08, 2013 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
The loss mechanisms associated with engine downsizing, boosting and compression ratio change are assessed. Of interest are the extents of friction loss, pumping loss, and crevice loss. The latter does not scale proportionally with engine size. These losses are deconstructed via a cycle simulation model which encompasses a friction model and a crevice loss model for engine displacement of 300 to 500 cc per cylinder. Boost pressure is adjusted to yield constant torque. The compression ratio is varied from 8 to 20. Under part load, moderate speed condition (1600 rpm; 13.4 Nm/cylinder brake torque), the pumping work reduces significantly with downsizing while the work loss associated with the crevice volume increases. At full load (1600 rpm; 43.6 Nm/cylinder brake torque), the pumping work is less significant. The crevice loss (normalized to the fuel energy) is essentially the same as in the part load case. The sensitivities of the respective loss terms to downsizing are reported.
CitationSmith, P. and Cheng, W., "Assessing the Loss Mechanisms Associated with Engine Downsizing, Boosting and Compression Ratio Change," SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-0929, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4271/2013-01-0929.
- Lake, T., Stokes, J., Murphy, R., Osborne, R. et al., “Turbocharging Concepts for Downsized DI Gasoline Engines,” SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-0036, 2004, doi:10.4271/2004-01-0036.
- Bandel, W., Fraidl, G., Kapus, P., Sikinger, H. et al., “The Turbocharged GDI Engine: Boosted Synergies for High Fuel Economy Plus Ultra-low Emission,” SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-1266, 2006, doi:10.4271/2006-01-1266.
- Shahed, S. and Bauer, K., “Parametric Studies of the Impact of Turbocharging on Gasoline Engine Downsizing,” SAE Int. J. Engines 2(1):1347-1358, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-1472.
- Arnold, S., Balis, C., Jeckel, D., Larcher, S. et al., “Advances in Turbocharging Technology and its Impact on Meeting Proposed California GHG Emission Regulations,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-1852, 2005, doi:10.4271/2005-01-1852.
- Bromberg, L., Cohn, D. R., and Heywood, J. B., “Optimized Fuel Management System for Direct Injection Ethanol Enhancement of Gasoline Engines”, U.S. patent 7225787 B2, June 5, 2007.
- Patton, K., Nitschke, R., and Heywood, J., “Development and Evaluation of a Friction Model for Spark-Ignition Engines,” SAE Technical Paper 890836, 1989, doi:10.4271/890836.
- Sandoval, D. and Heywood, J., “An Improved Friction Model for Spark-Ignition Engines,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-0725, 2003, doi:10.4271/2003-01-0725.
- Adamczyk, A.A., Kaiser, E.W., and Lavoie, G.A., “A Combustion Bomb Study of the Hydrocarbon Emissions from Engine Crevices,” Combust. Sci. Technol., Vol. 28, pp. 69-73, 1982.
- Kaplan, J. and Heywood, J., “Modeling the Spark Ignition Engine Warm-Up Process to Predict Component Temperatures and Hydrocarbon Emissions,” SAE Technical Paper 910302, 1991, doi:10.4271/910302.
- Esfahanian V., Javaheri A., Ghaffarpour M., “Thermal analysis of an SI engine piston using different combustion boundary condition treatments,” Applied Thermal Engineering, 26, (2-3), 277-287, 2006 doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2005.05.002.
- Gatowski, J., Balles, E., Chun, K., Nelson, F. et al., “Heat Release Analysis of Engine Pressure Data,” SAE Technical Paper 841359, 1984, doi:10.4271/841359.
- GT Suite v7.2.0, Gamma Technologies, 2012.
- Min, K.D., Cheng, W.K., “Oxidation of the Piston Crevice Hydrocarbon During the Expansion Process in a Spark Ignition Engine,” Combust. Sci. and Tech. 106, 4-6, 307-326, 1995.
- Cheng, W., Hamrin, D., Heywood, J., Hochgreb, S. et al., “An Overview of Hydrocarbon Emissions Mechanisms in Spark-Ignition Engines,” SAE Technical Paper 932708, 1993, doi:10.4271/932708.