This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Estimated Cost of Emission Control Technologies for Light-Duty Vehicles Part 1 - Gasoline
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 08, 2013 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
The cost of meeting standards for conventional pollutant emissions is a perennial bone of contention in arguments over vehicle emission regulations. The public health benefits of the most stringent standards have been repeatedly and conclusively demonstrated, and the control technologies are readily available. Nevertheless, countries with the largest vehicle markets worldwide differ greatly in the rates at which they are willing to adopt the most stringent emission standards-and some of those whose populations would benefit most lag furthest behind. Among the reasons often given for delaying the implementation of stricter standards is the extra cost added to the vehicle by the emission control system.
This two-part series paper assesses separately the cost of emission control technologies for gasoline and diesel light duty vehicles. In part one, the paper addresses the cost of gasoline light-duty emission control technology by regulatory level, from early stages to upcoming levels. Focus is given to Three-Way Catalytic converters. Technologies and costs are studied for the two main regulatory programs followed globally, the European and the U.S. emission standards. The paper presents an update on early U.S. and EU emission standards compliance costs as the original estimates have never been updated to reflect actual experience and incorporate the substantial improvements in emission control technologies and reductions in cost that have occurred over time. The paper assesses the costs of required technologies in current terms, using both direct and indirect methods to account for technology changes, correct for inflation, and pull in feedback from experts. Estimates reveal that the cost of taking a 2.0 L, 4-cylinder vehicle, from Euro 1 technology controls to the most stringent proposed EU standard (Euro 6) is close to US$150. Similar costs are found for technologies following the US program.
CitationPosada, F., Bandivadekar, A., and German, J., "Estimated Cost of Emission Control Technologies for Light-Duty Vehicles Part 1 - Gasoline," SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-0534, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4271/2013-01-0534.
- Chen, B., et al., Analysis of Auto Industry and Consumer Response to Regulations and Technological Change, and Customization of Consumer Response Models in Support of AB 1493 Rulemaking: Effect of Emissions Regulation on Vehicle Attributes, Cost, and Price. 2004.
- Wang, Q., Kling C., and Sperling D., Light-duty vehicle exhaust emission control cost estimates using a part-pricing approach. Air & Waste, 1993. 43(11): p. 1461-1471.
- Heywood, J., Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals 1988: McGraw-Hill Science/Engineering/Math
- Burke, A., Abeles E., and Chen B., The Response of the Auto Industry and Consumers to changes in the exhaust emission and fuel economy standards (1975-2003): A historical review of changes in technology, prices and sales of various classes of vehicles. 2004.
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Light-Duty Automotive Technology, Carbon Dioxide Emissions, and Fuel Economy Trends: 1975 Through 2011, 2012, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Office of Transportation and Air Quality: Washington D.C.
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Regulatory Impact Analysis - Control of Air Pollution from New Motor Vehicles: Tier 2 Motor Vehicle Emissions Standards and Gasoline Sulfur Control Requirements 1999, U.S. EPA.
- German, J., “Observations Concerning Current Motor Vehicle Emissions,” SAE Technical Paper 950812, 1995, doi: 10.4271/950812.
- Walsh, M.P., Automobile Emission Motor Vehicle Pollution Control in the United States and Europe, in The Reality of Precaution: Comparing Risk Regulation in the United States and Europe, Wiener J.B., et al., Editors. 2010, RFF Press.
- Kishi, N., Kikuchi, S., Suzuki, N., and Hayashi, T., “Technology for Reducing Exhaust Gas Emissions in Zero Level Emission Vehicles(ZLEV),” SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-0772, 1999, doi:10.4271/1999-01-0772.
- Mitsuishi, S., Mori, K., Nishizawa, K., and Yamamoto, S., “Emission Reduction Technologies for Turbocharged Engines,” SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-3629, 1999, doi:10.4271/1999-01-3629.
- Ricardo, Support for Updating the RAINS Model Concerning Road Transport - Final Report, 2003, Interprofessional Technical Centre for Studies on Air Pollution (CITEPA).
- European Commission (EC), Commission Staff Working Document. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on type approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions and on access to vehicle repair information - Impact Assesement, 2005, Commission of the European Communities: Brussels.
- Heck, R.M., Farrauto R.J., and Gulati S.T., Catalytic air pollution control : commercial technology. 3rd ed2009, Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley. xxi, 522 p.
- Omoto, H., Kobayashi, T., Ishikawa, K., and Yamada, T., “Catalyst Design for Meeting Stringent LEV-2 NOx Regulation,” SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-0348, 2002, doi:10.4271/2002-01-0348.
- Truex, T., Golden, S., Polli, A., Hawthorne, R. et al., “Advanced Low Platinum Group Metal Three-Way Catalyst for LEV-II and ULEV-II Compliance,” SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-0344, 2002, doi:10.4271/2002-01-0344.
- ICCT, European Market Vehicle Statistics, Mock P., Editor 2012, International Council on Clean Transportation: Berlin.
- Zhang, S. and McMahon, W., “Particulate Emissions for LEV II Light-Duty Gasoline Direct Injection Vehicles,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 5(2):637-646, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-0442.
- Minjares R. and Posada Sanchez F., Estimated Cost of Gasoline Particulate Filters, 2011, International Council on Clean Transportation.
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Regulatory Impact Analysis: Control of Emissions of Air Pollution from Highway Heavy-Duty Engines, 2000, U.S. EPA - Office of Transportation and Air Quality.
- California Air Resours Board (CARB), Low-Emission Vehcile and Zero-Emission Vehicle Program Review - Staff Report, 1996, CARB - Mobile Source Division.
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Regulatory Impact Analysis National Low Emission Vehicle Program, 1997, U.S EPA.
- California Air Resours Board (CARB), Proposed Amendments to California Exhaust and Evaporative Emission Standards and Test Procedures for Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks and Medium Duty Vehicles - LEV II - Staff Report, Initial Statement of Reasons 1998, Air Resours Board.
- Golden, S., Polli, A., Hatfield, R., Cotton, M. et al., “Advanced Low Platinum Group Metal Three-Way Catalysts for Tier 2 and LEV II Compliance,” SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-0659, 2001, doi:10.4271/2001-01-0659.
- Collins, N., Cooper, J., Morris, D., Ravenscroft, A. et al., “Advanced Three-Way Catalysts - Optimisation by Targeted Zoning of Precious Metal,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-2158, 2005, doi:10.4271/2005-01-2158.
- Rogozhin A., Gallaher M., and McManus W., Automobile Industry Retail Price Equivalent and Indirect Cost Multipliers, 2009, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Final Regulatory Analysis: Control of Emissions from Non Road Diesel Engines. Washington, 2004, U.S. EPA - Office of Transportation and Air Quality.
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards for Model Years 2017-2025. Interim Joint Technical Assessment 2010, U.S. EPA.
- Johnson, T., Personal communication on LDV Emission Control Technologies and Costs Study, 2011: Washington DC.
- Aoki, Y., Yoshida, T., Tanabe, T., Hatanaka, M. et al., “Development of Double-Layered Three-Way Catalysts,” SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-1081, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-1081.
- Iwakuni, H., Miyoshi, S., and Takami, A., “Development of PGM Single Nano Catalyst Technology,” SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-1079, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-1079.
- Matthey Johnson. Platinum today. PGM Prices 2012; Available from: http://www.platinum.matthey.com/pgmprices.
- Johnson, T., “Gasoline Vehicle Emissions - SAE 1999 In Review,” SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-0855, 2000, doi:10.4271/2000-01-0855.
- Arnold, L., Collins, N., Cooper, J., Eyre, D. et al., “Development and Application of New Low Rhodium Three-Way Catalyst Technology,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-26-016, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-26-016.
- Favre, C., May J., and Bosteels D., Emissions Control Technologies to Meet Current and Future European Vehicle Emissions Legislation, 2011: Association for Emissions Control by Catalyst. Brussels, Belgium.
- Kubsh J., Personal communication on LDV Emission Control Technologies and Costs Study, 2011: Washingotn D.C.
- U.S. National Academy of Sciences (NAS), Assessment of Fuel Economy Technologies for Light-Duty Vehicles, 2011, The National Academies Press: Washington D.C.
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Final Rulemaking to Establish Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards - Joint Technical Support Document, 2010, U.S. EPA- Office of Transportation and Air Quality and NHTSA - Office of International Policy, Fuel Economy, and Consumer Programs.
- Martec, Variable Costs of Fuel Economy Technologies. Prepared for: The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, 2008: Washington D.C.
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), A Study of Potential Effectiveness of Carbon Dioxide Reducing Vehicle Technologies - Revised Final Report, 2008, Prepared for EPA by Ricardo, Inc.
- Summers, J., Williamson, W., and Scaparo, J., “The Role of Durability and Evaluation Conditions on the Performance of Pt/Rh and Pd/Rh Automotive Catalysts,” SAE Technical Paper 900495, 1990, doi: 10.4271/900495.
- Noda, N., Takahashi, A., and Mizuno, H., “In-line Hydrocarbon (HC) Adsorber System for Cold Start Emissions,” SAE Technical Paper 970266, 1997, doi: 10.4271/970266.
- Roychoudhury, S., Muench, G., Bianchi, J., Pfefferle, W. et al., “Development and Performance of Microlith™ Light-Off Preconverters for LEV/ULEV,” SAE Technical Paper 971023, 1997, doi: 10.4271/971023.
- Brisley, R., Collins, N., Morris, D., and Twigg, M., “Development of Thermally Durable Three-way Catalysts for use in South America,” SAE Technical Paper 982905, 1998, doi: 10.4271/982905.
- Williamson, W., Dou, D., and Robota, H., “Dual-Catalyst Underfloor LEV/ULEV Strategies for Effective Precious Metal Management,” SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-0776, 1999, doi:10.4271/1999-01-0776.
- Ichikawa, S., Takemoto, T., Sumida, H., Koda, Y. et al., “Development of Low Light-off Three Way Catalyst,” SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-0307, 1999, doi:10.4271/1999-01-0307.
- Andersen, P. and Ballinger, T., “Improvements in Pd:Rh and Pt:Rh Three Way Catalysts,” SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-0308, 1999, doi:10.4271/1999-01-0308.
- Brisley, R., Collins, N., French, C., Morris, D. et al., “Development of Advanced Platinum-Rhodium Catalyst for Future Emissions Requirements,” SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-3627, 1999, doi:10.4271/1999-01-3627.
- Ball, D., Richmond, R., Kirby, C., Tripp, G. et al., “UltraThin Wall Catalyst Solutions at Similar Restriction and Precious Metal Loading,” SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-1844, 2000, doi:10.4271/2000-01-1844.
- Engler, B., Koberstein, E., and Lox, E., “Three-way Catalyst Concepts with Optimized Low Precious Metal Loadings,” SAE Technical Paper 900271, 1990, doi: 10.4271/900271.
- Pattas, K., Stamatelos, A., Pistikopoulos, P., Koltsakis, G. et al., “Transient Modeling of 3-Way Catalytic Converters,” SAE Technical Paper 940934, 1994, doi: 10.4271/940934.
- Collins, N., Morris, D., Ravenscroft, A., Twigg, M. et al., “Development of Advanced Three-Way Catalysts that Enable Low PGM Loadings for Future Mercosur Emissions Legislation,” SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-3551, 2002, doi:10.4271/2002-01-3551.
- Keenan, M. and Thomson, J., “The Challenges of Meeting Future Emissions Legislation with a Novel Low Precious Metal TWC,” SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-2984, 2004, doi:10.4271/2004-01-2984.
- Rohart, E., Larcher, O., Allain, M., Ottaviani, E. et al., “High Thermostable Hybrid Zirconia Materials for Low Loading Precious Metal Catalyst Technology,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-1107, 2005, doi:10.4271/2005-01-1107.
- Rabinowitz, H., Siemund, S., Collin, T., and Campbell, B., “Achieving EURO-III and EURO-IV with Ultra-Low Precious Metal Loadings,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-26-017, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-26-017.