This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
From Crash Test Speed to Performance in Real World Conditions: A Conceptual Model and Its Application to Underhood Clearance in Pedestrian Head Tests
Published October 29, 2012 by The Stapp Association in United States
Annotation ability available
Current safety testing protocols typically evaluate performance at a single test speed, which may have undesirable side effects if vehicles are optimised to perform at that speed without consideration to performance at other speeds. One way of overcoming this problem is by using an evaluation that incorporates the distribution of speeds that would be encountered in real crashes, the relationship between test speed and test performance, and the relationship between test performance and injury risk. Such an evaluation is presented in this paper and is applied to pedestrian headform testing. The applicable distribution of pedestrian impact speeds was compiled from in-depth crash data. Values of the Head Injury Criterion across the speed distribution were imputed from a single test result, taking into account the potential for ‘bottoming out’ on harder structures beneath the hood. Two different risk functions were used: skull fracture risk and fatal head injury risk. Eight example test locations were evaluated; each had an underhood clearance such that it would perform worse at higher speeds than suggested by its original test result. When the effect of bottoming out was included in the evaluation, the calculated average injury risk was generally higher than it was if bottoming out was ignored. The average risk of fatal head injury was more affected by the inclusion of bottoming out than the average skull fracture risk. The methodology presented in this paper may be extended to other forms of impact testing, although the input functions may be more difficult to derive for more complex tests.
CitationSearson, D., Hutchinson, T., and Anderson, R., "From Crash Test Speed to Performance in Real World Conditions: A Conceptual Model and Its Application to Underhood Clearance in Pedestrian Head Tests," SAE Technical Paper 2012-22-0014, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-22-0014.
- Anderson R.W.G. , Searson D.J. , and Hutchinson T.P. 2012 Integrating the assessment of pedestrian safety in vehicles with collision detection and mitigation systems Proc. 2012 IRCOBI Conference, International Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury Zurich, Switzerland
- Euro NCAP 2011 Assessment protocol - pedestrian protection. Version 5.1 European New Car Assessment Programme Brussels, Belgium
- Euro NCAP 2012 Pedestrian testing protocol. Version 6.1 European New Car Assessment Programme Brussels, Belgium
- Funk J. , Duma S. , Manoogian S. , and Rowson S. 2007 Biomechanical risk estimates for mild traumatic brain injury Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine: 51st Annual Proceedings Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine Illinois, USA
- Horsch , J.D. 1987 Evaluation of occupant protection from responses measured in laboratory tests SAE Technical Paper 870222 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA
- Hutchinson T.P. , Anderson R.W.G. , and Searson D.J. 2012 Pedestrian headform testing: Inferring performance at impact speeds and for headform masses not tested, and estimating average performance in a range of real-world conditions Traffic Injury Prevention 13 4 402 411
- Korner J. 1989 A method for evaluating occupant protection by correlating accident data with laboratory test data SAE Technical Paper 890747 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA
- Lawrence G.J.L. , Hardy B.J. , Carroll J.A. , Donaldson W.M.S. , Visvikis C. , and Peel D.A. 2006 A study on the feasibility of measures relating to the protection of pedestrian and other vulnerable road users TRL Project Report UPR/VE/045/06 TRL Limited Crowthorne, United Kingdom
- Lie A. , and Tingvall C. 2000 How does the Euro NCAP test results correlate to real life injury risks - paired comparison study of car to car crashes Proc. 2000 IRCOBI Conference International Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury Zurich, Switzerland
- Mertz H. 2003 Injury risk assessments based on dummy responses Accidental Injury: Biomechanics and Prevention second Nahum A.M. and Melvin J.W. 89 102 Springer New York
- Mizuno Y. 2003 Summary of IHRA Pedestrian Safety WG Activities Proc. 18th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington DC
- Newstead S.V. , Delaney A.K. , Cameron M.H. , and Watson L.M. 2006 Study of the relationship between injury outcomes in police reported crash data and crash barrier test results in Europe and Australia Proc. Australasian Road Safety Research, Policing & Education Conference 2006 1 10 Able Video & Multimedia Pty Ltd QLD, Australia
- NHTSA 1995 FMVSS No. 201 upper interior head protection Final economic assessment National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington DC
- Prasad P. , and Mertz H. 1985 The position of the United States delegation to the ISO Working Group 6 on the use of HIC in the automotive environment SAE Technical Paper 851246 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA
- Rowson S. , and Duma S.M. 2011 Development of the STAR evaluation system for football helmets: Integrating player head impact exposure and risk of concussion Annals of Biomedical Engineering 39 8 2130 2140
- Searle J.A. , Bethell J. , and Baggaley G. 1978 The variation of human tolerance to impact and its effect on the design and testing of automotive impact performance Proc. of the 22 nd Stapp Car Crash Conference Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA
- Searson D.J. , Anderson R.W.G. , and Hutchinson T.P. 2012 The effect of impact speed on the HIC obtained in pedestrian headform tests International Journal of Crashworthiness 17 5 562 570
- Viano D.C. 1988 Limits and challenges of crash protection Accident Analysis and Prevention 20 6 421 429