This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Snow Traction Performance of Low Rolling Resistance Drive Tires for Class-8 Tractor Trailers
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published September 24, 2012 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Dynamic traction testing of a sample of drive tires for class 8 tractor-trailers provides information about the relation among rolling resistance, tire design, and traction performance in snow conditions. The tests were conducted to address concerns that low rolling resistance tires used to save fuel and reduce emissions may have inferior traction on snow. In addition to the dynamic traction testing, based on ASTM F-1805, rolling resistance was tested using ISO 28580, and characteristics of the tread design were measured, including tread depth and void ratio, using ASTM F421 and ASTM F-870. In general, tires designed for increased traction, usually made with open shoulders, had a higher snow traction rating than tires designed for highway applications with closed shoulders. There was no significant correlation between the snow traction rating and the coefficient of rolling resistance. Although the tires with the lowest values of rolling resistance tended to have lower snow traction ratings, many tire models with much higher values of rolling resistance had similar low snow traction ratings.
Of the tire design parameters examined, the only one to have significant correlation with the snow traction rating (p≺0.05) was gross contact area, which was not significantly correlated with the rolling resistance coefficient. Conversely, the rolling resistance coefficient was correlated significantly (p≺0.05) only with average tread depth, which was not significantly correlated with the snow traction rating. The results of this investigation suggest that tire manufacturers use a variety of design features in the development of low rolling resistance tires, and that it is possible to design low rolling resistance tires with superior snow traction.
|Journal Article||Longitudinal Interfacial Forces of the Interaction of a Treaded Tire with Snow|
|Technical Paper||Measurement of Snow Surfaces and Tire Performance Evaluation|
CitationBachman, L. and McIntyre, J., "Snow Traction Performance of Low Rolling Resistance Drive Tires for Class-8 Tractor Trailers," SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-1918, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-1918.
- Bachman, L. Erb, A. Bynum, C. “Effect of Single Wide Tires and Trailer Aerodynamics on Fuel Economy and NOx Emissions of Class 8 Line-Haul Tractor-Trailers,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-3551 2005 10.4271/2005-01-3551
- Bachman, L. Erb, A. Bynum, C. Shoffner, B. et al. “Fuel Economy Improvements and NOx Reduction by Reduction of Parasitic Losses: Effect of Engine Design,” SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-3474 2006 10.4271/2006-01-3474
- LaClair, T. Truemner, R. “Modeling of Fuel Consumption for Heavy-Duty Trucks and the Impact of Tire Rolling Resistance,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-3550 2005 10.4271/2005-01-3550
- http://www.epa.gov/smartway/technology/tires.htm March 28 2012
- National Research Council Technologies and approaches to reducing the fuel consumption of medium- and heavy-duty vehicles: Committee to Assess Fuel Economy Technologies for Medium and Heavy-Duty Vehicles Transportation Research Board, National Academies Press Washington, DC 2010
- Tuthill, Jennifer Natural Resources Canada June 2010
- Kruskal, W.H. Wallis, W.A. Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis Journal of the American Statistical Association 47 260 583 621 1952
- Lew, Stanley Michelin North America March 2012