This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Simulation of the μMist ® Fuel Injection System's Fine Droplet Spray Air-Entrainment from Injection Point, within the Intake Manifold, to the Cylinder
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published September 10, 2012 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
The entrainment of the fine spray of the μMist® fuel injection system (patented technology) with induction air within the intake port of a test engine (Lotus single-cylinder thermodynamic engine) has been simulated using a commercial CFD package. Moving mesh complexities have been avoided via a steady state simplification of the induction air flow within the intake manifold and the cylinder, and the induction air flow rate is set to its average (over the intake stroke) at 2000 rev/min for that engine under WOT. Since this engine has two intake valves, previous experiments had a μMist® injector with two orifices, each aimed at the back of one of the two intake valves. In this study, the wall wetting effect of the two different injection angles between the dual sprays, that were previously experimentally tested on the aforementioned engine, have been compared numerically. The modelling showed that the experimental configuration was still suboptimal with some demonstrable wall wetting, which could be minimised by alteration of the port injection angles, including the bifurcation angle between the two streams. Finally, the experimentally developed increased mass flow (by 50%) injector was simulated to predict its anticipated experimental performance as regards to wall wetting. It was found that the increased flow rate, despite also increasing the injection velocity by ∼50%, can be configured to reduce wall wetting, since it produces smaller droplets that are better air entrained than the conventional larger droplets that were simulated earlier.
This modified μMist® injector shows virtually no wall wetting, and this performance is independent of the injection angles, which is a great advantage for applying the design to various engine configurations - it is anticipated to further improve the engine emissions and performance compared to previous engine experiments which already had shown significant advantages over state-of-the-art PFI and to some extent over DI injectors (injecting into the cylinder in homogenous DI mode, not into the intake port) .
CitationBeheshti, N. and Walker, R., "Simulation of the μMist® Fuel Injection System's Fine Droplet Spray Air-Entrainment from Injection Point, within the Intake Manifold, to the Cylinder," SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-1659, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-1659.
- Beheshti, N. McIntosh, A.C. A Biomimetic Study of the Explosive Discharge of the Bombardier Beetle Int. Journal of Design & Nature 1 1 61 69 2007
- Beheshti, N. McIntosh, A.C. The Bombardier Beetle and its Use of a Pressure Relief Valve System to Deliver a Periodic Pulsed Spray Bioinsp. Biomim. 2 57 64 2007
- Wigley, G. Patel, R. Pitcher, G. Turner, J. et al. “μMist® - The next generation fuel injection system: Improved atomisation and combustion for port-fuel-injected engines,” SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-1890 2011 10.4271/2011-01-1890
- Dahlander, P. High-Speed Photography and Phase Doppler Anemometry Measurements of Flash-Boiling Multi-Hole Injector Sprays for Spray-Guided Gasoline Direct Injection SIAMUF 2006
- Reitz, R. D. A Photographic Study of Flash-Boiling Atomization Aerosol Science and Technology 12 3 561 569 1990
- Senda, J. Wada, Y. Kawano, D. Fujimoto, H. Improvement of Combustion and Emissions in Diesel Engines by Means of Enhanced Mixture Formation Based on Flash Boiling of Mixed Fuel International Journal of Engine Research 9 1 15 27 2008
- Horender, S. Sommerfeld, M. Reduced coalescence of droplets due to evaporation ILASS Europe 2004, Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems Nottingham, UK Azzopardi, B. 231 236 2004
- Stansfield, P. Wigley, G. Garner, C. Patel, R. et al. “Unthrottled Engine Operation using Variable Valve Actuation: The Impact on the Flow Field, Mixing and Combustion,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-1414 2007 10.4271/2007-01-1414
- Ansys CFX-Solver theory guide 2011