This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Charge Cooling Effects on Knock Limits in SI DI Engines Using Gasoline/Ethanol Blends: Part 1-Quantifying Charge Cooling
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 16, 2012 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Gasoline/ethanol fuel blends have significant synergies with Spark Ignited Direct Injected (SI DI) engines. The higher latent heat of vaporization of ethanol increases charge cooling due to fuel evaporation and thus improves knock onset limits and efficiency. Realizing these benefits, however, can be challenging due to the finite time available for fuel evaporation and mixing. A methodology was developed to quantify how much in-cylinder charge cooling takes place in an engine for different gasoline/ethanol blends.
Using a turbocharged SI engine with both Port Fuel Injection (PFI) and Direct Injection (DI), knock onset limits were measured for different intake air temperatures for both types of injection and five gasoline/ethanol blends. The superior charge cooling in DI compared to PFI for the same fuel resulted in pushing knock onset limits to higher in-cylinder maximum pressures.
Knock onset is used as a diagnostic of charge cooling. The experiment measures how much the intake air needed to be heated in DI mode to cancel out charge cooling and make the engine knock at the same conditions as PFI. The same maximum pressure at borderline knock was used to make the comparison between DI and PFI. It is additionally shown that when maximum pressure at borderline knock is the same between DI and PFI, all conditions relevant to knock are very similar. The temperature difference measured using this methodology corresponds to how much more charge cooling due to fuel evaporation took place in DI. The measured charge cooling increases with fuel ethanol content from 14 degrees C for gasoline to 49 degrees C for E85 (85% ethanol, 15% gasoline by volume). The amount of charge cooling as a fraction of the thermodynamic maximum was around 70% for all fuel blends. The starting intake air temperature for E50 and E85 was significantly higher compared to lower ethanol blends due to hardware limitations. It is anticipated that the high intake air temperatures contributed significantly to the high charge cooling numbers realized for high ethanol blends by making fuel evaporation faster. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) modeling confirmed that intake air temperature indeed has a significant effect of on how much charge cooling is realized.
This paper is the first part of a two paper series looking at the chemical and charge cooling effects of gasoline ethanol blends on engine knock.
CitationKasseris, E. and Heywood, J., "Charge Cooling Effects on Knock Limits in SI DI Engines Using Gasoline/Ethanol Blends: Part 1-Quantifying Charge Cooling," SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-1275, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-1275.
- 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA), http://energy.senate.gov/public/_files/getdoc1.pdf
- Cohn, D.R., Bromberg, L., Heywood, J.B., Direct Injection Ethanol Boosted Gasoline Engines: Biofuel Leveraging For Cost Effective Reduction of Oil Dependence and CO2 Emissions, MIT Laboratory for Energy and the Environment report LFEE 2005-001 (April 2005), available at http://lfee.mit.edu/public/LFEE_2005-001_RP.pdf
- Bromberg, L. and Cohn, D.R., Heywood, J.B., Calculations Of Knock Suppression In Highly Turbocharged Gasoline/Ethanol Engines Using Direct Ethanol Injection, MIT Laboratory for Energy and the Environment report LFEE 2006-001 available at http://web.mit.edu/mitei/lfee/programs/archive/publications/reports.html
- Anderson, W., Yang, J., Brehob, D., Vallance, J. et al., “Understanding the Thermodynamics of Direct Injection Spark Ignition (DISI) Combustion Systems: An Analytical and Experimental Investigation,” SAE Technical Paper 962018, 1996, doi: 10.4271/962018.
- Wyszynski, L., Stone, C., and Kalghatgi, G., “The Volumetric Efficiency of Direct and Port Injection Gasoline Engines with Different Fuels,” SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-0839, 2002, doi:10.4271/2002-01-0839.
- Marriott, C., Wiles, M., Gwidt, J., and Parrish, S., “Development of a Naturally Aspirated Spark Ignition Direct-Injection Flex-Fuel Engine,” SAE Int. J. Engines 1(1):267-295, 2009, doi:10.4271/2008-01-0319.
- Marriott, C., Wiles, M., and Rouse, B., “Development, Implementation, and Validation of a Fuel Impingement Model for Direct Injected Fuels with High Enthalpy of Vaporization,” SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-0306, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-0306.
- Sjöberg, M. and Dec, J., “An Investigation of the Relationship Between Measured Intake Temperature, BDC Temperature, and Combustion Phasing for Premixed and DI HCCI Engines” SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-1900, 2004, doi:10.4271/2004-01-1900.
- Price, P., Twiney, B., Stone, R., Kar, K. et al., “Particulate and Hydrocarbon Emissions from a Spray Guided Direct Injection Spark Ignition Engine with Oxygenate Fuel Blends,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0472, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-0472.
- Kar, K., Last, T., Haywood, C., and Raine, R., “Measurement of Vapor Pressures and Enthalpies of Vaporization of Gasoline and Ethanol Blends and Their Effects on Mixture Preparation in an SI Engine,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 1(1):132-144, 2009, doi:10.4271/2008-01-0317.
- Swarts, A. and Yates, A., “In-Cylinder Fuel Evaporation and Heat Transfer Information Inferred from the Polytropic Character of the Compression Stroke in a Spark-Ignition Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-1856, 2004, doi:10.4271/2004-01-1856.
- GT Power v7.0 Documentation, Gamma Technologies, 2011.
- Boam, D.J. and Finlay, I.C., “A Computer Model of Fuel Evaporation in the Intake system of a carbureted petrol engine”, Conference on fuel economy and emissions of lean burn engines, paper number C89/79 June 12-14, 1979.
- Behnia, M. and Milton, B.E., “Fundamentals of fuel film formation and motion in SI engine induction systems”, Energy conversion and management, Vol. 42, pp. 1751-1768, 2001
- Landsberg, G., Heywood, J., and Cheng, W., “Contribution of Liquid Fuel to Hydrocarbon Emissions in Spark Ignition Engines,” SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-3587, 2001, doi:10.4271/2001-01-3587.
- Meyer, R. and Heywood, J., “Evaporation of In-Cylinder Liquid Fuel Droplets in an SI Engine: A Diagnostic-Based Modeling Study,” SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-0567, 1999, doi:10.4271/1999-01-0567.
- Milton, B.E., Behnia, M and Ellerman, D.M., “Fuel deposition and re-atomisation from fuel/air flows though engine inlet valves”, International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, Vol. 22, pp. 350-357, 2001
- Kasseris, E., “Knock Limits in Spark Ignited Direct Injected Engines Using Gasoline/Ethanol Blends”, PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, 2011
- Anderson, J. E., Kramer, U., Mueller, S. A. and Wallington, T. J., “Octane Numbers of Ethanol- and Methanol-Gasoline Blends Estimated from Molar Concentrations”, Energy Fuels 2010, 24, 6576-6585
- Bai, C. and Gosman, A., “Mathematical Modelling of Wall Films Formed by Impinging Sprays,” SAE Technical Paper 960626, 1996, doi: 10.4271/960626.
- Kasseris, E. and Heywood, J., “Charge Cooling Effects on Knock Limits in SI DI Engines Using Gasoline/Ethanol Blends: Part 2-Effective Octane Numbers,” SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-1284, 2012.
- GT Power v7.0, Gamma Technologies, 2011- http://www.gtisoft.com/.